Weibull lagged effect step-stress model with competing risks

References

• Bagdonavičius, V., Nikulin, N. (2002). Accelerated Life Models, Modeling and Statistical Analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, N., Han, D. (2008). Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from exponential distribution under type-II censoring. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 138:4172–4186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrami, J. (2015). Exponential competing risk step-stress model with lagged effect. Int. J. Math. Stat. 16(1):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, C. (1968). Introduction to Stochastic Processes in Biostatistics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. (1959). The analysis of exponentially distributed life-times with two types of failure. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 21:411–421.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder, M. (2001). Classical Competing Risks. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• David, H., Moeschberger, M. (1978). The Theory of Competing Risks. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, L.A., Meeker, W.Q. (2006). A review of accelerated test models. Stat. Sci. 21(4):552–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, J.P., Gray, R.J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94:496–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, J. (1961). A bivariate extension of the exponential distribution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56:971–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gail, M. (1975). A review and critique of some models used in competing risk analysis. Biometrics 31:209–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R.C. (2013). Competing risk analysis. In El-Shaarawi, A.-H., Piegorsh, W. eds,. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, 468–477.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., May, S. (2008). Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan, N., Kundu, D., Balakrishnan, N. (2010). Survival models for step-stress experiments with lagged effects. In Nikulin, M.S., Limnios, N., Balakrishnan, N., Kahle, W., Huber-Carol, C. eds. Advances in Degradation Modeling, Applications to Reliability, Survival Analysis, and Finance. Boston: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Komori, Y. (2006). Properties of the Weibull cumulative exposure model. J. Appl. Stat. 33(1):17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagakos, S. (1978). A covariate model for partially censored data subject to competing causes of failure. Appl. Stat. 27:235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, J.F. (2002). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Qiu, W.S. (2011). Modeling and planning of step-stress accelerated life tests with independent competing risks. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60(4):712–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maller, R.A., Zhou, X. (2002). Analysis of parametric models for competing risks. Stat. Sin. 12:725–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I. (1967). A multivariate exponential distribution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62:30–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeker, W.Q., Escobar, L.A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moeschberger, M. (1974). Life tests under dependent competing causes of failure. Technometrics 16:39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy Prabhakar, D.N.P., Xie, M., Jiang, R. (2004). Weibull Models. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, W. (1980). Accelerated life testing: Step-stress models and data analysis. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-29:103–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, F. (2007). Accelerated life test planning with independent Weibull competing risks with known shape parameter. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 56:85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, F. (2008). Accelerated life test planning with independent Weibull competing risks with known shape parameter. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57:435–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintilie, M. (2006). Competing Risks: A Practical Perspective. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, R., Kalbfleisch, J., Peterson, A.V., Flournoy, N., Farewell, V., Breslow, N. (1978). The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 34:541–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampford, M. (1952). The estimation of response-time distributions. II. Multi-stimulus distributions. Biometrics 8:307–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedyakin, N.M. (1980). On one physical principle in reliability theory. Tech. Cybernet. 3:80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Slud, E., Byar, D., Schatzkin, A. (1988). Dependent competing risks and the latent-failure model. Biometrics 44:1203–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teimouri, M., Nadarajah, S. (2012). A simple estimator for the Weibull shape parameter. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dynam. 12(2):395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dorp, J.R., Mazzuchi, T.A. (2005). A general Bayes Weibull inference model for accelerated life testing. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 90:140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, A.A. (2013). Estimation of the shape parameter of the Weibull distribution using linear regression methods: Non-censored samples. Qual. Reliab. Engrg. Int. 29:1207–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.F., Xie, M., Tang, L.C. (2006). Robust regression using probability plots for estimating the Weibull shape parameter. Qual. Reliab. Engrg. Int. 22:905–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar