389
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Inference for a simple step-stress model with progressively censored competing risks data from Weibull distribution

&
Pages 7238-7255 | Received 22 Dec 2014, Accepted 25 Jan 2016, Published online: 25 Apr 2017

References

  • Balakrishnan, N., Han, D. (2008). Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from exponential distribution under type-II censoring. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 138:4172–4186.
  • Balakrishnan, N., Aggarwala, R. (2000). Progressive Censoring: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Boston: Birkhäuser.
  • Balakrishnan, N., Xie, Q. (2007). Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with type-II hybrid censored data from the exponential distribution. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 137:2543–2563.
  • Balakrishnan, N., Sandu, R.A. (1995). A simple simulation algorithm for generating progressive type-II censored samples. Am. Stat. 49:229–230.
  • Bunea, C., Mazzuchi, T.A. (2006). Competing failure modes in accelerated life testing. J. Statist. Plann. Infer. 136:1608–1620.
  • Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 34:187–220.
  • Cramer, E., Schmiedt, A.B. (2011). Progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions. Computat. Stat. Data Anal. 55:1285–1303.
  • Crowder, M.J. (2001). Classical Competing Risks. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Crowder, M.J. (1991). On the identifiability crises in competing risks analysis. Scand. J. Stat. 18:223–233.
  • David, H.A., Moeschberger, M.L. (1978). The Theory of Competing Risks. London: Griffin.
  • DiCiccio, T.J., Efron, B. (1996). Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat. Sci. 11:189–228.
  • Han, D., Kundu, D. (2015). Inference for a step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the generalized exponential distribution under type-I censoring. IEEE Trans. Rel. 64:31–43.
  • Gilks, W.R., Wild, P. (1992). Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Appl. Stat. 41:337–348.
  • Han, D., Balakrishnan, N. (2010). Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint. Computat. Stat. Data Anal. 54:2066–2081.
  • Klein, J.P., Basu, A.P. (1981). Weibull accelerated life tests when there are competing causes of failure. Commun. Stat. Theor. Meth. 10:2073–2100.
  • Klein, J.P., Basu, A.P. (1982b). Accelerated life tests under competing Weibull causes of failure. Commun. Stat. Theor. Meth. 11:2271–2286.
  • Kalbfleisch, J.D., Prentice, R.L. (2002). The Statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley.
  • Lee, J., Pan, R. (2012). A GLM approach to step-stress accelerated life testing with interval censoring. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 142:810–819.
  • Lin, C.T., Balakrishnan, N. (2011). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators based on progressive type-II censoring. Metrika. 74:349–360.
  • Meeker, W.Q., Escobar, L.A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Morton, S.C. (1990). Bootstrap confidence intervals in a complex situation: a sequential paired clinical trial. Commun. Stat. Theor. Meth. 19:181–195.
  • Pareek, B., Kundu, D., Kumar, S. (2009). On progressively censored competing risks data for Weibull distributions. Computat. Stat. Data Anal. 53:4083–4094.
  • Sarhan, A.M., Alameri, M., Al-Wasel, I. (2008). Analysis of progressive censoring competing risk data with binomial removals. Int. J. Math. Anal. 2:965–976.
  • Sarhan, A.M., Hamilton, D.C., Smith, B. (2010). Statistical analysis of competing risks models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 95:953–962.
  • Sha, N., Pan, R. (2014). Bayesian analysis for step-stress accelerated life testing using Weibull proportional hazard model. Stat. Pap. 55:715–726.
  • Wu, M., Shi, Y., Sun, Y. (2014). Inference for accelerated competing failure models from Weibull distribution under type-I progressive hybrid censoring. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 263:423–431.
  • Xu, A., Tang, Y. (2011). Objective Bayesian analysis of accelerated competing failure models under type-I censoring. Computat. Stat. Data Anal. 55:2830–2839.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.