Designing of a mixed-chain sampling plan based on the process capability index with chain sampling as the attributes plan

References

• Aslam, M., Azam, M., Balamurali, S., Jun, C.-H. (2012). A new mixed acceptance sampling plan based on sudden death testing under the Weibull distribution. J. Chin. Inst. Ind. Engineers. 29(6):427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wu, C.W., Azam, M., Jun, C.H. (2013a). Variables sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Appl Math Model. 37(3):667–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wu, C.-W., Azam, M., Jun, C.-H. (2014). Mixed acceptance sampling plans for product inspection using process capability index. Qual Eng. 26(4):450–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wu, C.-W., Jun, C.-H., Azam, M., Itay, N. (2013b). Developing a variables repetitive sampling plan based on Cpk with unknown mean and variance. J. Stat. Simul. Comput. 83(8):1507–1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S. (2003). Bootstrap confidence limits for short-run capability indices. Qual Eng. 15(4):651–656.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Kalyanasundaram, M. (2002). Bootstrap lower confidence limits for the process capability indices Cp, Cpk and Cpm. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 19(8/9):1088–1097.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Park, H., Jun, C.H., Kim, K.J., Lee, J. (2005). Designing of variables repetitive group sampling plan involving minimum average sample number. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 34(3):799–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Usha, M. (2013). Optimal designing of variables chain sampling plans by minimizing the average sample number. Int. J. Manuf. Eng. 2013:12 Pages, Article ID 7518407.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Usha, M. (2014). Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index Cpk. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 31(2):85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W., Spiring, F.A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: cpm. J. Qual. Technol. 30(3):162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Lam, Y. (1999). Bayesian variable sampling plan for Weibull distribution with type i censoring. Mathemat. App. Sinica. 15(3):269–280.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H.F. (1955). Chain sampling inspection plan. Ind. Qual. Control. 11(1):10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H.F., Romig, H.G. (1929). A method of sampling inspection. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 8(10):613–631.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A.J. (1986). Quality Control and Industrial Statistics. 5th ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K. (1990). Selection of ChSP-1 chain sampling plans for given acceptable quality level and limiting quality level. Commun Stat.Theor Meth. 19(6):2179–2190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., Balamurali, S. (1998). Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. J Appl Stat. 25(1):103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itay, N., Parmet, Y., Schechtman, E. (2009). Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk. Qual Eng. 21(3):306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itay, N., Parmet, Y., Schechtman, E. (2011). Developing a model-based sampling plan. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 27(8):1183–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, V.E. (1986). Process capability indices. J. Qual. Technol. 18(1):41–52, Corrigenda pp. 265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocherlakotan, S., Balakrishnan, N. (1986). One and two sided sampling plans based on the exponential distribution. Naval Res Logist. 33(3):513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (2002). Process capability indices – A review, 1992–2000. J. Qual. Technol. 34(1):2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S., Lovelace, C. (1998). Process Capability Indices in Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Y. (1994). Bayesian variable sampling plan for exponential distribution with type I censoring”. Ann Stat. 22(2):696–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Pu, X., Xiang, D. (2011). Mixed variables-attributes test plans for single and double acceptance sampling under exponential distribution. Math. Probl. Eng. 2011:1–15, Article ID 575036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. (1985). The effect of non-normality on variables sampling plans. Naval Res. Logistics Q. 32(1):27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. (2009). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mudholkar, G.S., George, E.O. (1978). A remark on the shape of the logistic distribution. Biometrika. 65(3):667–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J. (1999). Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W.L., Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J. Qual. Technol. 24(4):216–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, C., Jothikumar, J. (1994). A design of chain sampling plan ChSP-1 based on Kullback-Leibler information. J Appl Stat. 21(3):153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Sahli, A., Trecourt, P., Robin, S. (1997). One sided acceptance sampling by variables: The case of the laplace distribution. Commun Stat. Theor Meth. 26(11):2817–2834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, E.G., Dodge, H.F. (1969). Procedures and tables for evaluating dependent mixed acceptance sampling plans. Technometrics. 11(2):341–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, E.G., Neubayer, D.V. (2009). Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. Second Edition. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V. (1978). Procedures and tables for construction and selection of chain sampling plans (ChSP-1)-Part I. J. Qual. Technol. 7(1):56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Spiring, F., Leung, B., Cheng, S., Yeung, A. (2003). A bibliography of process capability papers. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 19(5):445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, K.K., Devaarul, S. (2002). Designing and selection of mixed sampling plans with chain sampling as attribute plan. Qual Eng. 15(1):155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh, R.P., Ramanathan, T.V. (1997). Acceptance sampling plans by variables for a class of symmetric distributions. Commun Stat Simulat Comput. 26(4):379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi, K. (1972). On designing unknown-sigma sampling plans based on a wide class of non-normal distributions. Technometrics. 14(3):669–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-W., Wu, T.-H., Chen, T. (2015). Developing a variables repetitive group sampling scheme by considering process yield and quality loss. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(7):2239–2251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum, B.J., Kim, K.W. (2011). A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 27(3):251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar