Testing for residual correlation of any order in the autoregressive process

References

• Bercu, B. 1998. Central limit theorem and law of iterated logarithm for least squares algorithms in adaptive tracking. The SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 36:910–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercu, B., and F. Proïa. 2013. A sharp analysis on the asymptotic behavior of the Durbin-Watson statistic for the first-order autoregressive process. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 17 (1):500–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bitseki, Penda, V., H. Djellout, and F. Proïa. 2014. Moderate deviations for the Durbin-Watson statistic related to the first-order autoregressive process. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 18 (1):308–31.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and G. M. Ljung. 1978. On a measure of a lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65 (2):297–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and D. A. Pierce. 1970. Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive-integrated moving average time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65:1509–26.
   Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. 1978. Testing for autocorrelation in dynamic linear models. Australian Economic Papers 17 (31):334–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockwell, P. J., and R. A. Davis. 1991. Time series: Theory and methods. 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics. New-York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chaabane, F., and F. Maaouia. 2000. Théorèmes limites avec poids pour les martingales vectorielles. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 4:137–89.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, K. W. E. 1987. The solution of the matrix equations AXB − CXD = E and (YA − DZ, YC − BZ) = (E, F). Linear Algebra and its Applications 93:93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchesne, P., and C. Francq. 2008. On diagnostic checking time series models with portmanteau test statistics based on generalized inverses and 2-inverses. In Proceedings in Computational Statistics. vol. 100, 143–54. ed. P. Brito. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Duflo, M. 1997. Random iterative models, vol. 34 of Applications of Mathematics, New York. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Duflo, M., R. Senoussi, and A. Touati. 1990. Sur la loi des grands nombres pour les martingales vectorielles et l’estimateur des moindres carrés d’un modèle de régression. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar 26:549–66.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin, J. 1970. Testing for serial correlation in least-squares regression when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 38:410–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin, J. 1986. Approximate distributions of Student's t-statistics for autoregressive coefficients calculated from regression residuals. Journal of Applied Probability 23A:173–85.
   Google Scholar
• Durbin, J., and G. S. Watson. 1950. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I. Biometrika 37:409–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin, J., and G. S. Watson. 1951. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. II. Biometrika 38:159–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durbin, J., and G. S. Watson. 1971. Testing for serial correlation in least squares regession. III. Biometrika 58:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. J., and D. M. Westbrook. 1984. Small-sample properties of estimators of a regression equation with a lagged dependent variable and serial correlation. American Statistical Association: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section 653–8.
   Google Scholar
• Francq, C., R. Roy, and J. M. Zakoian. 2005. Diagnostic checking in ARMA models with uncorrelated errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100:532–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, L. G. 1978. Testing against general autoregressive and moving average error models when the regressors include lagged dependent variables. Econometrica 46:1293–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenander, U., and G. Szegö. 1958. Toeplitz forms and their applications. California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and C. C. Heyde. 1980. Martingale limit theory and its application. Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hatanaka, M. 1974. An efficient estimator for the dynamic adjustment model with autocorrelated errors. Journal of Econometrics 2:199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D. M., and W. L. L’Esperance. 1973. Effects of autocorrelated errors on various least squares estimators a Monte Carlo study. Communications in Statistics 2:507–23.
   Google Scholar
• Inder, B. A. 1984. Finite-sample power of tests for autocorrelation in models containing lagged dependent variables. Economics Letters 14:179–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inder, B. A. 1986. An approximation to the null distribution of the Durbin–Watson statistic in models containing lagged dependent variables. Econometric Theory 2:413–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jekanowski, M. D., and J. K. Binkley. 1996. Lagged dependent variables and serially correlated errors: Which estimators can we trust? American Statistical Association: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section 237–242.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. L., and P. X. Wu. 1991. Small-disturbance asymptotics and the Durbin-Watson and related tests in the dynamic regression model. The Journal of Econometrics 47:145–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S., and A. S. Rao. 1973. Tests for serial correlation in regression models with lagged dependent variables and serially correlated errors. Econometrica 41:761–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeshiro, A. 1980. Small sample properties of estimators of distributed lag models. International Economic Review 21 (3):721–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeshiro, A. 1987. OLS as an estimator of a dynamic model with ARMA errors. American Statistical Association: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section 638–42.
   Google Scholar
• Maeshiro, A. 1990. Peculiar bias properties of the OLS estimator when applied to a dynamic model with autocorrelated disturbances. Communications in Statistics 19 (4):1185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Maeshiro, A. 1996. Teaching regressions with a lagged dependent variable and autocorrelated disturbances. The Journal of Economic Education 27:72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeshiro, A. 1999. A lagged dependent variable, autocorrelated disturbances and unit root tests - peculiar OLS bias properties—a pedagogical note. Applied Economics 31:381–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinvaud, E. 1961. Estimation et prévision dans les modèles économiques autorégressifs. Review of the International Institute of Statistics 29:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nerlove, M., and K. F. Wallis. 1966. Use of the Durbin-Watson statistic in inappropriate situations. Econometrica 34:235–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. B. 1975. On the small-sample power of Durbin's h test. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70:60–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. A. 1970. Rational distributed lag models with autoregressive-moving average errors. American Statistical Association: Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section 591–596.
   Google Scholar
• Proïa, F. 2013. Further results on the H-Test of Durbin for stable autoregressive processes. The Journal of Multivariate Analysis 118:77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, T. J. 1968. Some evidence on the small sample properties of distributed lag estimators in the presence of autocorrelated disturbances. The Review of Economics and Statistics 50:87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker, T. 2007. On the asymptotic bias of OLS in dynamic regression models with autocorrelated errors. Statistical Papers 48:81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, W. F. 1974. Almost sure convergence, vol. 24 of Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York-London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J. 1941. Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 12:367–95.
   Google Scholar