A composite class of estimators using scrambled response mechanism for sensitive population mean in successive sampling

References

• Arnab, R., and S. Singh. 2013. Estimation of mean of sensitive characteristics for successive sampling. Comm. Statist.-Theo. Meth. 42 (14):2499–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandhyopadhyay, A., and G. N. Singh. 2014. On the use of two auxiliary variables to improve the precision of estimate in two-occasion successive sampling. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 15 (1):73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. C. 1977. Sampling techniques. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. 3rd ed. New York-London-Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, XVi+428pp.
   Google Scholar
• Diana, G., and P. F. Perri. 2010. New scrambled response models for estimating the mean of a sensitive quantitative character. J. App. Statis. 37 (11):1875–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, G., and P. F. Perri. 2011. A class of estimators for quantitative sensitive data. Stat. Pap. 52 (3):633–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorn, B. H., and L. S. Hayre. 1983. Scrambled randomized response method for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. J. Statist. Plann. Infer. 7 (4):307–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S., and G. Zou. 1997. Sample rotation method with auxiliary variable. Comm. Stat.- Theo. Meth. 26 (6):1497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., and J. Shabbir. 2008. On improvement in estimating the population mean in simple random sampling. Journal of Applied Statistics 35 (5):559–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., J. Shabbir, R. Sousa, and P. C. Real. 2012. Estimation of the mean of a sensitive variable in the presence of auxiliary information. Comm. Statist.-Theo. Meth. 41 (13–14):2394–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. N., B. Thorton, J. Shabbir, and S. Singhal. 2006. A comparison of multiplicative and additive optional RRT models. J. Statist. Theo. Appl. 5 (3):226–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, Z., and B. Al-Zahrani. 2016. Mean and sensitivity estimation of a sensitive variable through additive scrambling. Comm. Stat. Theo. Meth. 45 (1):182–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessen, R. J. 1942. Statistical investigation of a sample survey for obtaining farm facts. Iowa Agri. Exp. Stat. Res Bull. 304:1–104.
   Google Scholar
• Koyuncu, N., S. Gupta, and R. Sousa. 2014. Exponential-type estimators of the mean of a sensitive variable in the presence of a non-sensitive auxiliary information. Comm. Stat.- Sim. Comp. 43 (7):1583–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, H. D. 1950. Sampling on successive occasions with partial replacement of units. J. Royal Statis. Soci. 12:241–55.
   Google Scholar
• Perri, P. F., and G. Diana. 2013. Scrambled response models based on auxiliary variables. Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Berlin: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-35588-2_26.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, K. H., and Y. Bek. 1976. A comparison of three randomized response models for quantitative data. J. Amm. Sta. Asso. 71 (336):884–86.
   Google Scholar
• Priyanka, K., and R. Mittal. 2014. Effective rotation patterns for median estimation in successive sampling. Statis. Trans. 15 (2):197–220.
   Google Scholar
• Priyanka, K., and R. Mittal. 2015a. A class of estimators for population median in two occasion rotation sampling. HJMS 44 (1):189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Priyanka, K., and R. Mittal. 2015b. Estimation of population median in two-occasion Rotation Sampling. J. Stat. App. Prob. Lett. 2 (3):205–19.
   Google Scholar
• Priyanka, K., R. Mittal, and J. Min-Kim. 2015. Multivariate rotation design for population mean in sampling on successive occasions. Comm. Statis. Appli. Meth. 22 (5):445–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, A. 2007. A simple randomized response technique in complex surveys. Metron 65 (1):59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. R. 1973. Theory and application of sampling on repeated occasions with several auxiliary variables. Biometrics 29 (2):381–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G. N. 2005. On the use of Chain-type ratio estimator in successive sampling. Statistics in Transition 7 (1):21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, G. N., and K. Priyanka. 2008. Search of good rotation patterns to improve the precision of estimates at current occasion. Comm. Stat. Theo. Meth. 37 (3–5):337–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G. N., S. Suman, M. Khetan, and C. Paul. 2017. Some estimation procedures of sensitive character using scrambled response techniques in successive sampling. Comm.Statist-Theory and Methods, DOI:10.1080/03610926.2017.1327073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, H. P., and G. K. Vishwakarma. 2007. A general class of estimators in successive sampling. Metron-International Journal of statistics LXV (2):201–27.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S. K., and S. K. Jhajj. 1980. A class of estimators using auxiliary information for estimating finite population variance. Sankhya series C 42:87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, D. S., H. P. Singh, and R. Singh. 1996. An alternative to ratio-cum-product estimator in sample surveys. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 53:375–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, S. L. 1965. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Asso. 60 (309):63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., Z. Jin, J. Tian, and G. Gao. 2015. Estimation of sensitive proportion by randomized response data in successive sampling. Comput. Math. Meth. Med. DOI:10.1155/2015/172918, 6pp.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar