Bootstrap likelihood ratio test for Weibull mixture models fitted to grouped data

References

• Arnholt, A. T. 2012. BSDA: Basic Statistics and Data Analysis. R package version 1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Basford, K. E., D. R. Greenway, G. J. McLachlan, and D. Peel. 1997. Standard errors of fitted component means of normal mixtures. Computational Statistics 12 (1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezanson, J., A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah. 2017. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Review 59 (1):65–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, P. J., and H. Chernoff. 1993. Asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic in a prototypical non regular problem. Statistics and Probability: A Raghu Raj Bahadur Festschrift 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, R. D., and M. Aitkin. 1981. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 46 (4):443–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bučar, T., M. Nagode, and M. Fajdiga. 2004. Reliability approximation using finite Weibull mixture distributions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 84 (3):241–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, T., D. Sharpe, N. Jenkins, and E. Bossanyi. 2001. Wind energy handbook. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Carta, J. A., and P. Ramirez. 2007. Analysis of two-component mixture weibull statistics for estimation of wind speed distributions. Renewable Energy 32 (3):518–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carta, J. A., P. Ramirez, and S. Velazquez. 2009. A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the canary islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (5):933–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and J. D. Kalbfleisch. 1996. Penalized minimum-distance estimates in finite mixture models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 24 (2):167–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 39 (1):1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics 7 (1):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1994. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmahdy, E. E., and A. W. Aboutahoun. 2013. A new approach for parameter estimation of finite Weibull mixture distributions for reliability modeling. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (4):1800–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farewell, V. T. 1982. The use of mixture models for the analysis of survival data with long-term survivors. Biometrics 38 (4):1041–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., and C. E. McCulloch. 1992. Statistical inference using maximum likelihood estimation and the generalized likelihood ratio when the true parameter is on the boundary of the parameter space. Statistics & Probability Letters 13 (4):325–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z. D., and C. E. McCulloch. 1996. Using bootstrap likelihood ratios in finite mixture models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 58 (3):609–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitjan, D. F. 1989. Inference from grouped continuous data: a review. Statistical Science 4 (2):164–83.
   Google Scholar
• Izenman, A. J., and C. J. Sommer. 1988. Philatelic mixtures and multimodal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (404):941–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. F., C. E. Priebe, and D. J. Marchette. 2001. Consistent estimation of mixture complexity. The Annals of Statistics 29 (5):1281–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., and R. Podlaski. 2012. Modelling irregular and multimodal tree diameter distributions by finite mixture models: an approach to stand structure characterisation. Journal of Forest Research 17 (1):79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlis, D., and E. Xekalaki. 1999. On testing for the number of components in a mixed poisson model. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 51 (1):149–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and Y. Shao. 2004. Asymptotics for the likelihood ratio test in a two-component normal mixture model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 123 (1):61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., N. R. Mendell, and D. B. Rubin. 2001. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88 (3):767–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, P. 2012. mixdist: Finite Mixture Distribution Models. R package version 0.5-4.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, J. M., M. T. Rodriguez-Bernal, and M. P. Wiper. 2005. Using weibull mixture distributions to model heterogeneous survival data. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 34 (3):673–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., and D. Peel. 2004. Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J. 1987. On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test stastistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Applied Statistics 36 (3):318–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., and P. N. Jones. 1988. Fitting mixture models to grouped and truncated data via the EM algorithm. Biometrics 44 (2):571–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G. J., and T. Krishnan. 1997. The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mosler, K., and C. Scheicher. 2008. Homogeneity testing in a weibull mixture model. Statistical Papers 49 (2):315–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podlaski, R. 2010. Two-component mixture models for diameter distributions in mixed-species, two-age cohort stands. Forest Science 56 (4):379–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podlaski, R., and F. A. Roesch. 2014. Modelling diameter distributions of two-cohort Forest stands with various proportions of dominant species: A two-component mixture model approach. Mathematical Biosciences 249:60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, X., J.-S. Zhang, and X.-D. Yan. 2012. Two improved mixture weibull models for the analysis of wind speed data. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 51 (7):1321–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, S., and P. J. Green. 1997. On bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 59 (4):731–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, D., J. Bloemendal, D. K. Rea, J. Vandenberghe, F. Jiang, Z. An, and R. Su. 2002. Grain-size distribution function of polymodal sediments in hydraulic and Aeolian environments, and numerical partitioning of the sedimentary components. Sedimentary Geology 152 (3–4):263–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, W. F. 1964. Modification of sediment size distributions. Journal of Sedimentary Research 34 (1):156–64.
   Google Scholar
• Team, R Core. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, G. S. 1969. Grain size distributions and depositional processes. Journal of Sedimentary Research 39 (3):1074–106.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. H. 1971. A Monte Carlo study of the sampling distribution of the likelihood ratio for mixtures of multinormal distributions. Technical Report, DTIC Document.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, M.-J., and T. N. Sriram. 2007. Robust estimation of mixture complexity for count data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 (9):4379–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y. 2017. mixR: Finite Mixture Modeling for Raw and Binned Data. R package version 0.1.0.
   Google Scholar