131
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Test of parameter changes in a class of observation-driven models for count time series

&
Pages 1933-1959 | Received 26 Sep 2018, Accepted 30 Nov 2018, Published online: 05 Feb 2019

References

  • Ahmad, A., and C. Francq. 2016. Poisson QMLE of count time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 37 (3):291–314. doi:10.1111/jtsa.12167.
  • Aue, A., and L. Horváth. 2013. Structural breaks in time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 34 (1):1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2012.00819.x.
  • Berkes, I., L. Horváth, and P. Kokoszka. 2003. GARCH processes: structure and estimation. Bernoulli 9 (2):201–27. doi:10.3150/bj/1068128975.
  • Brännäs, K., and A. M. M. S. Quoreshi. 2010. Integer-valued moving average modelling of the number of transactions in stocks. Applied Financial Economics 20 (18):1429–40. doi:10.1080/09603107.2010.498343.
  • Christou, V., and K. Fokianos. 2014. Quasi-likelihood inference for negative binomial time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 35 (1):55–78. doi:10.1111/jtsa.12050.
  • Cox, D. R. 1981. Statistical analysis of time series: some recent developments. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 8 :93–115.
  • Cui, Y., and Q. Zheng. 2017. Conditional maximum likelihood estimation for a class of observation-driven time series models for count data. Statistics and Probability Letters 123 :193–201. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2016.11.002.
  • Cui, Y., and X. Wang. 2018. Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in negative binomial INGARCH processes with known number of successes when the true parameter is at the boundary of the parameter space. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. doi:10.1080/03610926.2018.1476710.
  • Czado, C., T. Gneiting, and L. Held. 2009. Predictive model assessment for count data. Biometrics 65 (4):1254–61. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01191.x.
  • Davis, R. A., W. T. M. Dunsmuir, and Y. Wang. 2000. On autocorrelation in a Poisson regression model. Biometrika 87 (3):491–505. doi:10.1093/biomet/87.3.491.
  • Davis, R. A., S. H. Holan, R. B. Lund, and N. Ravishanker. 2016. Handbook of Discrete-Valued time series. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Davis, R. A., K. Knight, and J. Liu. 1992. M-estimation for autoregressions with infinite variance. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 40 (1):145–80. doi:10.1016/0304-4149(92)90142-D.
  • Davis, R. A., and H. Liu. 2016. Theory and inference for a class of nonlinear models with application to time series of counts. Statistica Sinica 26 :1673–707. doi:10.5705/ss.2014.145t.
  • Davis, R. A., and R. Wu. 2009. A negative binomial model for time series of counts. Biometrika 96 (3):735–49. doi:10.1093/biomet/asp029.
  • Diop, M. L., and W. Kengne. 2017. Testing parameter change in general integer-valued time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis 38 (6):880–94. doi:10.1111/jtsa.12240.
  • Doukhan, P., and W. Kengne. 2015. Inference and testing for structural change in general Poisson autoregressive models. Electronic Journal of Statistics 9 (1):1267–314. doi:10.1214/15-EJS1038.
  • Ferland, R., A. Latour, and D. Oraichi. 2006. Integer-valued GARCH process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 27 (6):923–42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00496.x.
  • Fokianos, K., and R. Fried. 2010. Interventions in INGARCH processes. Journal of Time Series Analysis 31 (3):210–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2010.00657.x.
  • Fokianos, K., E. Gombay, and A. Hussein. 2014. Retrospective change detection for binary time series models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 145 :102–12. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2013.08.017.
  • Fokianos, K., A. Rahbek, and D. Tjøstheim. 2009. Poisson autoregression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104 (488):1430–9. doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08270.
  • Francq, C., and J. M. Zakoïan. 2004. Maximum likelihood estimation of pure GARCH and ARMA-GARCH processes. Bernoulli 10 (4):605–37. doi:10.3150/bj/1093265632.
  • Franke, J., C. Kirch, and J. T. Kamgaing. 2012. Change points in times series of counts. Journal of Time Series Analysis 33 (5):757–70. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2011.00778.x.
  • Heinen, A. 2003. Modelling time series count data: An autoregressive conditional Poisson model. Technical Report MPRA Paper 8113, Germany: University Library of Munich. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8113/.
  • Hudecová, Š. 2013. Structural changes in autoregressive models for binary time series. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 143(10):1744–52. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2013.05.009.
  • Hudecová, Š., M. Hušková, and S. Meintanis. 2015. Detection of changes in INAR models. In Stochastic models, Statistics and their applications, vol. 122, 11–18. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics: Wrocław, Poland.
  • Kang, J., and S. Lee. 2009. Parameter change test for random coefficient integer-valued autoregressive processes with application to polio data analysis. Journal of Time Series Analysis 30(2):239–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2009.00608.x.
  • Kang, J., and S. Lee. 2014. Parameter change test for Poisson autoregressive models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 41 (4):1136–52. doi:10.1111/sjos.12088.
  • Kirch, C., and J. T. Kamgaing. 2015. On the use of estimating functions in monitoring time series for change points. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 161 :25–49. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2014.12.009.
  • Kirch, C., and J. T. Kamgaing. 2016. Detection of change points in discrete-valued time series. In Handbook of Discrete-Valued time series, 219–244. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
  • Lee, S., J. Ha, O. Na, and S. Na. 2003. The CUSUM test for parameter change in time series models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 30(4):781–96. doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00364.
  • Liu, M., Q. Li, and F. Zhu. 2018. Threshold negative binomial autoregressive model. Statistics. doi:10.1080/02331888.2018.1546307.
  • Lund, R. B., X. L. Wang, J. Reeves, Q. Lu, C. Gallagher, and Y. Feng. 2007. Changepoint detection in periodic and autocorrelated time series. Journal of Climate 20 (20):5178–90. doi:10.1175/JCLI4291.1.
  • Robbins, M. W., C. Gallagher, and R. B. Lund. 2016. A general regression changepoint test for time series data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 111 (514):670–83. doi:10.1080/01621459.2015.1029130.
  • Robbins, M. W., R. B. Lund, C. Gallagher, and Q. Lu. 2011. Changepoints in the North Atlantic tropical cyclone record. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 (493):89–99. doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10023.
  • Straumann, D., and T. Mikosch. 2006. Quasi-maximum-likelihood estimation in conditionally heteroscedastic time series: a stochastic recurrence equations approach. The Annals of Statistics 34(5):2449–95. doi:10.1214/009053606000000803.
  • Tsay, R. S. 2010. Analysis of financial time series. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Wang, C., H. Liu, J. F. Yao, R. A. Davis, and W. K. Li. 2014. Self-excited threshold Poisson autoregression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 109 (506):777–87. doi:10.1080/01621459.2013.872994.
  • Weiß, C. H. 2007. Controlling correlated processes of poisson counts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 23 (6):741–54. doi:10.1002/qre.875.
  • Weiß, C. H., and M. C. Testik. 2009. CUSUM monitoring of first-order integer-valued autoregressive processes of Poisson counts. Journal of Quality Technology 41 (4):389–400. doi:10.1080/00224065.2009.11917793.
  • Weiß, C. H., and M. C. Testik. 2011. The poisson INAR(1) CUSUM chart under overdispersion and estimation error. IIE Transactions 43 (11):805–18. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2010.550910.
  • Weiß, C. H., and M. C. Testik. 2012. Detection of abrupt changes in count data time series: Cumulative sum derivations for INARCH(1) models. Journal of Quality Technology 44 (3):249–64. doi:10.1080/00224065.2012.11917898.
  • Wu, W. B., and X. Shao. 2004. Limit theorems for iterated random functions. Journal of Applied Probability 41 (02):425–36. doi:10.1017/S0021900200014406.
  • Zeger, S. L. 1988. A regression model for time series of counts. Biometrika 75 (4):621–9. doi:10.2307/2336303.
  • Zhu, F. 2011. A negative binomial integer-valued GARCH model. Journal of Time Series Analysis 32 (1):54–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2010.00684.x.
  • Zhu, F. 2012a. Modeling overdispersed or underdispersed count data with generalized Poisson integer-valued GARCH models. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 389 (1):58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.11.042.
  • Zhu, F. 2012b. Zero-inflated Poisson and negative binomial integer-valued GARCH models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142 (4):826–39. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2011.10.002.
  • Zhu, R., and H. Joe. 2006. Modelling count data time series with Markov processes based on binomial thinning. Journal of Time Series Analysis 27 (5):725–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00485.x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.