Generally weighted moving average control charts using repetitive sampling

References

• Abbas, N., M. Riaz, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2013. Mixed exponentially weighted moving average-cumulative sum charts for process monitoring. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 29 (3):345–56. doi:10.1002/qre.1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, L., M. Aslam, and C. H. Jun. 2014. Designing of X-bar control charts based on process capability index using repetitive sampling. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 36 (3):367–74. doi:10.1177/0142331213502070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., and I. Musliyar. 2018. A note on designing of a hybrid exponentially weighted moving average. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97 (1–4):375–7. doi:10.1007/s00170-018-1952-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., N. Khan, M. Azam, and C. H. Jun. 2014. Designing of a new monitoring t-chart using repetitive sampling. Information Sciences 269:210–6. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam, M., M. Aslam, and C. H. Jun. 2015. Designing of a hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart using repetitive sampling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 77 (9–12):1927–33. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6585-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C. H. Jun. 2006. Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics 33 (3):327–38. doi:10.1080/02664760500446010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, A. 2013. A new hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 29 (7):1015–25. doi:10.1002/qre.1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, A. 2017. A new hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean: Discussion. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 33 (7):1629–31. doi:10.1002/qre.2092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, S. L. 2017. Novel design of composite generally weighted moving average and cumulative sum chart. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 33 (8):2397–408. doi:10.1002/qre.2197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. M., and R. B. Crosier. 1982. Fast initial response for CUSUM quality-control schemes: Give your CUSUM a head start. Technometrics 24 (3):199–205. doi:10.2307/1268679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. M., and M. S. Saccucci. 1990. Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: Properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32 (1):1–12. doi:10.2307/1269835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. 1954. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41 (1–2):100–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. W. 1959. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1 (3):239–50. doi:10.2307/1266443.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, R. E. 1965. Design and evaluation of repetitive group sampling plan. Technometrics 7 (1):11–21. doi:10.2307/1266124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu, S. H., and T. C. Lin. 2003. The generally weighted moving average control chart for detecting small shifts in the process mean. Quality Engineering 16 (2):209–31. doi:10.1081/QEN-120024009.
   Google Scholar
• Sheu, S. H., and Y. T. Hsieh. 2009. The extended GWMA control chart. Journal of Applied Statistics 36 (2):135–47. doi:10.1080/02664760802443913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann, K. H. 1996. Design of double CUSUM quality control schemes. European Journal of Operational Research 95 (3):641–8. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00317-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, B., M. Riaz, N. Abbas, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2015. Mixed cumulative sum-exponentially weighted moving average control charts: An efficient way of monitoring process location. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (8):1407–21. doi:10.1002/qre.1678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., and G. Chen. 2005. An extended EWMA mean chart. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 2:39–52. doi:10.1080/16843703.2005.11673088.
   Google Scholar