References
- Ardia, D., and L. F. Hoogerheide. 2010. Bayesian estimation of the GARCH(1,1) model with student-t innovations. The R Journal 2 (2):41–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2010-014.
- Bollerslev, T. 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31 (3):307–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
- Chen, M.-H. 1994. Importance-weighted marginal Bayesian posterior density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89 (427):818–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476815.
- Cho, H., J. G. Ibrahim, D. Sinha, and H. Zhu. 2009. Bayesian case influence diagnostics for survival models. Biometrics 65 (1):116–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01037.x.
- Deschamps, P. J. 2006. A flexible prior distribution for Markov switching autoregressions with Student-t errors. Journal of Econometrics 133 (1):153–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.03.012.
- Diggle, P., and P. Ribeiro, Jr. 2002. Bayesian inference in Gaussian model-based geostatistics. Geographical and Environmental Modelling 6 (2):129–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1361593022000029467.
- Duane, S., A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth. 1987. Hybrid Monte Carlo. Physics Letters B 195 (2):216–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X.
- Eguchi, S., and Y. Kano. 2001. Robustifying maximum likelihood estimation. Technical Report. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo Japan.
- Frigyik, B., S. Srivastava, and, and M. Gupta. 2008a. An introduction to functional derivatives. Technical report [online]. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Frigyik, B. A., S. Srivastava, and M. R. Gupta. 2008b. Functional Bregman divergence and Bayesian estimation of distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54 (11):5130–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2008.929943.
- Gaetan, C., and X. Guyon. 2010. Spatial Statistics and Modeling. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
- Gelman, A. 2006. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 1 (3):515–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/06-BA117A.
- Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin. 2004. Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
- Goh, G., and D. K. Dey. 2014. Bayesian model diagnostics using functional Bregman divergence. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 124:371–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2013.11.008.
- Hao, H.-X., J.-G. Lin, H.-X. Wang, and X.-F. Huang. 2016. Bayesian case influence analysis for GARCH models based on Kullback-Leibler divergence. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 45 (4):595–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2016.05.002.
- Hoffman, M. D., and A. Gelman. 2014. The No-U-Turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15:1351–81.
- Jackson, M. M., S. E. Gergel, and K. Martin. 2015. Effects of climate change on habitat availability and configuration for an endemic coastal alpine bird. Plos One 10 (11):e0142110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142110.
- Leimkuhler, B., and S. Reich. 2004. Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics. volume 14 of Cambridge monographs on applied and computational mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2, 18.
- McCulloch, R. E. 1989. Local model influence. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 (406):473–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1989.10478793.
- Neal, R. M. 2011. MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics. In Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo, 113–62. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall-CRC Press.
- Nesterov, Y. 2009. Primal-dual subgradient methods for convex problems. Mathematical Programming 120 (1):221–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-007-0149-x.
- R Core Team2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
- Stan Development Team. 2016. Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual. Version 2.14.0.
- Thomas, Z. M., S. N. MacEachern, and M. Peruggia. 2018. Reconciling curvature and importance sampling based procedures for summarizing case influence in bayesian models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 113 (524):1669–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1360777.