Systematic deviation in mean of log bayes factor: Implication and application

References

• Aitkin, M. 1991. Posterior bayes factors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 53 (1):111–42. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01812.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., and L. Pericchi. 2015. Bayes factors. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat00224.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O. 2013. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Berlin, Germany: Spring Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., and M. Delampady. 1987. Testing precise hypotheses. Statistical Science 2 (3):317–35. pages doi:10.1214/ss/1177013238.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., J. K. Ghosh, and N. Mukhopadhyay. 2003. Approximations and consistency of bayes factors as model dimension grows. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 112 (1-2):241–58. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(02)00336-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., and L. R. Pericchi. 1996. The intrinsic bayes factor for model selection and prediction. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (433):109–22. doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., L. R. Pericchi, J. Ghosh, T. Samanta, F. De Santis, J. Berger, and L. Pericchi. 2001. Objective bayesian methods for model selection: Introduction and comparison. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series pages 38:135–207.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, D., T. Maitra, and S. Bhattacharya. 2020. A short note on almost sure convergence of bayes factors in the general set-up. The American Statistician 74 (1):17–20. doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1397548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consonni, G., D. Fouskakis, B. Liseo, and I. Ntzoufras. 2018. Prior distributions for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Analysis 13 (2):627–79. doi:10.1214/18-BA1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and D. B. Rubin. 1995. Avoiding model selection in bayesian social research. Sociological Methodology 25:165–73. doi:10.2307/271064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and C. R. Shalizi. 2013. Philosophy and the practice of bayesian statistics. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 66 (1):8–38. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gönen, M., W. O. Johnson, Y. Lu, and P. H. Westfall. 2019. The bayesian two-sample t test. The American Statistician 59 (3):252–7. doi:10.1198/000313005X55233.
   Google Scholar
• Gönen, M., W. O. Johnson, Y. Lu, and P. H. Westfall. 2018. Comparing objective and subjective bayes factors for the two-sample comparison: The classification theorem in action. The American Statistician 73 (1):22–31. doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1322142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. 1939. The theory of probability. 1st ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, R. E., and L. Wasserman. 1995. A reference bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (431):928–34. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. 2013. Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 142 (2):573–603. doi:10.1037/a0029146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, J. G., V. Midya, and A. Berg. 2021. Connecting and contrasting the bayes factor and a modified rope procedure for testing interval null hypotheses. The American Statistician 75 (3):256–64. doi:10.1080/00031305.2019.1701550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. V. 1957. A statistical paradox. Biometrika 44 (1-2):187–92. doi:10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., and J. N. Rouder. 2011. Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods 16 (4):406–19. doi:10.1037/a0024377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, J., and E.-J. Wagenmakers. 2016. Editors’ introduction to the special issue “bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 72:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, J. T., M. Stewart, W. Yu, and S. E. Romanes. 2017. Bayesian hypothesis tests with diffuse priors: Can we have our cake and eat it too?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09146.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, C. P. 2014. On the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox. Philosophy of Science 81 (2):216–32. doi:10.1086/675729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J. 2007. Approximating interval hypothesis: P-values and bayes factors. Bayesian Statistics 8:417–52.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, A. 2013. Who should be afraid of the jeffreys-lindley paradox? Philosophy of Science 80 (1):73–93. doi:10.1086/668875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, J. 2013. Testing a precise null hypothesis: The case of Lindley’s paradox. Philosophy of Science 80 (5):733–44. doi:10.1086/673730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S., and B. Chryst. 2017. No need for bayes factors: A fully bayesian evidence synthesis. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 3:12. doi:10.3389/fams.2017.00012.
   Google Scholar
• Villa, C., and S. Walker. 2017. On the mathematics of the jeffreys–lindley paradox. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 46 (24):12290–8. doi:10.1080/03610926.2017.1295073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., and G. Liu. 2016. A simple two-sample bayesian t-test for hypothesis testing. The American Statistician 70 (2):195–201. doi:10.1080/00031305.2015.1093027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., and N. A. Lazar. 2016. The asa’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician 70 (2):129–33. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrinch, D., and H. Jeffreys. 1919. Lxxv. on some aspects of the theory of probability. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 38 (228):715–31. doi:10.1080/14786441208636005.
   Google Scholar
• Wrinch, D., and H. Jeffreys. 1921. Xlii. on certain fundamental principles of scientific inquiry. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 42 (249):369–90. doi:10.1080/14786442108633773.
   Google Scholar
• Wrinch, D., and H. Jeffreys. 1923. Xxxvii. on certain fundamental principles of scientific inquiry.(second paper). The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 45 (266):368–74. doi:10.1080/14786442308634125.
   Google Scholar