Information theory approach to ranked set sampling and new sub-ratio estimators

References

• Ashour, S. K., and M. S. Abdallah. 2022. New distribution function estimators and tests of perfect ranking in concomitant-based ranked set sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 51 (3):823–48. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1659360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahl, S., and R. Tuteja. 1991. Ratio and product type exponential estimators. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 12 (1):159–64. doi:10.1080/02522667.1991.10699058.
   Google Scholar
• Cingi, H., and C. Kadilar. 2009. Advances in sampling theory- ratio method of estimation. Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: Bentham E-Books Science Publishers, 78–91. doi:10.2174/97816080501231090101.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, T. M., and J. A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of information theory. 2nd ed. (Wiley Series in Telecommunications and Signal Processing). Wiley-Interscience: New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, H. 2018. Discrete ranked set sampling. Statistical science. Theses and Dissertations. Southern Methodist University.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, T. R., and J. L. Clutter. 1972. Ranked-set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28 (2):545–55. doi:10.2307/2556166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Open Data Portal. 2020. Accessed December 29, 2020. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/data/dataset/covid-19-coronavirus-data, doi:10.2906/101099100099/1.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, J. 2011a. A note on ranked-set sampling using a covariate. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141 (2):809–16. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, J. 2011b. Recursive computation of inclusion probabilities in ranked-set sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141 (11):3632–9. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2011.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, J. 2012. Nonparametric mean estimation using partially ordered sets. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 19 (3):309–26. doi:10.1007/s10651-012-0188-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, J., and T. G. Feeman. 2012. An improved mean estimator for judgment post-stratification. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 56 (2):418–26. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadilar, C., and H. Cingi. 2003. Ratio estimators in stratified random sampling. Biometrical Journal 45 (2):218–25. doi:10.1002/bimj.200390007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadilar, C., Y. Unyazici, and H. Cingi. 2009. Ratio estimator for the population mean using ranked set sampling. Statistical Papers 50 (2):301–9. doi:10.1007/s00362-007-0079-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçyiğit, E. G., and H. Çıngı. 2017. A new class of unbiased linear estimators in systematic sampling. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 46 (2):315–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçyiğit, E. G., and C. Kadilar. 2020. Ratio estimators for ranked set sampling in the presence of tie information. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation :1–14. (Ahead-of-Print) doi:10.1080/03610918.2020.1815777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullback, S. 1997. Information theory and statistics. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdizadeh, M., and N. R. Arghami. 2012. Quantile estimation using ranked set samples from a population with known mean. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 41 (10):1872–81. doi:10.1080/03610918.2011.624236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdizadeh, M., and E. Zamanzade. 2018. Stratified pair ranked set sampling. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 47 (24):5904–15. doi:10.1080/03610926.2017.1402053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdizadeh, M., and E. Zamanzade. 2019. On interval estimation of the population mean in ranked set sampling. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 51 (5):2747–68. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1700276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, G. P., A. K. Sinha, and C. Taillie. 1994. “Environmental statistics”. In Ranked-set sampling. Handbook of Statistics, ed. Patil, G. P. and Rao, C. R., vol. 12, New York, Amsterdam: North Holland/Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(05)80007-0
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, B. 1989. Some improved ratio type estimators of population mean and ratio in finite population sample surveys. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 18 (1):379–92. doi:10.1080/03610928908829905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, W., W. Chen, and X. He. 2021. Parameter estimation for the Pareto distribution based on ranked set sampling. Statistical Papers 62 (1):395–417. doi:10.1007/s00362-019-01102-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenouille, M. H. 1956. Notes on bias in estimation. Biometrika 43 (3–4):353–60. doi:10.2307/2332914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samawi, H. M., A. Chatterjee, J. Yin, and H. Rochani. 2019. On quantiles estimation based on different stratified sampling with optimal allocation. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 48 (6):1529–44. doi:10.1080/03610926.2018.1433856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samawi, H. M., and H. A. Muttlak. 1996. Estimation of ratio using rank set sampling. Biometrical Journal 38 (6):753–64. doi:10.1002/bimj.4710380616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samawi, H. M., L. Yu, H. Rochani, and R. Vogel. 2020. Reducing sample size needed for cox-proportional hazards model analysis using more efficient sampling method. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 49 (6):1281–98. doi:10.1080/03610926.2018.1554141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath, S., and T. M. Durairajan. 1988. An efficient ratio type estimator. Journal of the Indian Statistical Association 26:67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Shabbir, J., and M. Z. Yaab. 2003. Improvement over transformed auxiliary variable in estimating the finite population mean. Biometrical Journal 45 (6):723–9. doi:10.1002/bimj.200390044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communications. Bell System Technical Journal 27 (4):623–56. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, N. D. 1971. Systematic sampling and product method of estimation. In Proceedings of All India Seminar on Demography and Statistics, B.H.U, Varanasi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H. P., R. Tailor, and N. K. Jatwa. 2011. Modified ratio and product estimators for population mean in systematic sampling. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 10 (2):424–35. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1320120180.
   Google Scholar
• Tahmasebi, S., M. Longobardi, M. R. Kazemi, and M. Alizadeh. 2020. Cumulative Tsallis entropy for maximum ranked set sampling with unequal samples. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 556:124763. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2020.124763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahasi, K., and K. Wakimoto. 1968. On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 20 (1):1–31. doi:10.1007/BF02911622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, L. N., and H. P. Singh. 1999. Use of transformed auxiliary variable in estimating the finite population mean. Biometrical Journal 41 (5):627–36. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199909)41:5<627::AID-BIMJ627>3.0.CO;2-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishwakarma, G. K., S. M. Zeeshan, and C. N. Bouza-Herrera. 2017. Ratio and product type exponential estimators for population mean using ranked set sampling. Revista Investigacion Operacional 38 (3):266–71.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Situation report, 164. World Health Organization. Accessed April 3, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332972
   Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and M. Mahdizadeh. 2016. Entropy estimation from judgment post stratified data. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research 12 (4):625–37. doi:10.18187/pjsor.v12i4.1372.
   Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and M. Mahdizadeh. 2017a. A more efficient proportion estimator in ranked set sampling. Statistics & Probability Letters 129:28–33. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and M. Mahdizadeh. 2017b. Entropy estimation from ranked set samples with application to test of fit. Revista Colombiana de Estadística 40 (2):223–41. doi:10.15446/rce.v40n2.58944.
   Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and M. Mahdizadeh. 2018. Distribution function estimation using concomitant-based ranked set sampling. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 47 (144):1–761. doi:10.15672/HJMS.201814420708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and M. Mohammadi. 2016. Some modifed mean estimators in ranked set sampling using a covariate. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications 15 (2):142–52. doi:10.2991/jsta.2016.15.2.4.
   Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and M. Vock. 2015. Variance estimation in ranked set sampling using a concomitant variable. Statistics & Probability Letters 105:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2015.04.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanzade, E., and X. Wang. 2018. Proportion estimation in ranked set sampling in the presence of tie information. Computational Statistics 33 (3):1349–66. doi:10.1007/s00180-018-0807-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar