Monitoring the structure of social networks based on exponential random graph model

References

• Azarnoush, B., K. Paynabar, J. Bekki, and G. Runger. 2016. Monitoring temporal homogeneity in attributed network streams. Journal of Quality Technology 48 (1):28–43. doi:10.1080/00224065.2016.11918149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, O., and D. Strauss. 1986. Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (395):832–42. doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock, M. S., D. R. Hunter, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, P. N. Krivitsky, M. Morris, and M. P. N. Krivitsky. 2019. Package ‘ergm. userterms’. https://cran.ism.ac.jp/web/packages/ergm.userterms/ergm.userterms.
   Google Scholar
• Heard, N. A., D. J. Weston, K. Platanioti, and D. J. Hand. 2010. Bayesian anomaly detection methods for social networks. The Annals of Applied Statistics 4 (2):645–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, W. A., and J. B. Birch. 2009. Profile monitoring via nonlinear mixed model. Journal of Quality Technology 41 (1):18–34. doi:10.1080/00224065.2009.11917757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemzadeh, R. B., R. Noorossana, and A. Amiri. 2008. Phase I monitoring of polynomial profiles. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 37 (10):1671–86. doi:10.1080/03610920701691714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priebe, C. E., J. M. Conroy, D. J. Marchette, and Y. Park. 2005. Scan statistics on enron graphs. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 11 (3):229–47. doi:10.1007/s10588-005-5378-z.
   Google Scholar
• Rajabi, F., A. Saghaei, and S. Sadinejad. 2020. Monitoring of social network and change detection by applying statistical process: ERGM. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 13 (1):131–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ranshous, S., S. Shen, D. Koutra, S. Harenberg, C. Faloutsos, and N. F. Samatova. 2015. Anomaly detection in dynamic networks: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 7 (3):223–47. doi:10.1002/wics.1347.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, G., P. Pattison, Y. Kalish, and D. Lusher. 2007. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29 (2):173–91. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, D., and M. Ikeda. 1990. Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 (409):204–12. doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10475327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duijn, M. A., K. Gile, and M. S. Handcock. 2007. Comparison of maximum pseudo likelihood and maximum likelihood estimation of exponential family random graph models. Working Paper 74. Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Washington. http://www.Csss.Washington.Edu/Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., & Tsung, F. (2005). Using profile monitoring techniques for a data-rich environment with huge sample size. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(7), 677–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Robins, G. (2005). An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, 27, 148–61. doi:10.1002/qre.711.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H. 2007. Current research on profile monitoring. Production 17 (3):420–5. doi:10.1590/S0103-65132007000300002.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H., and D. C. Montgomery. 1999. Research issues and ideas in statistical process control. Journal of Quality Technology 31 (4):376–86. doi:10.1080/00224065.1999.11979944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H., M. J. Zhao, K. Paynabar, R. Sparks, and J. D. Wilson. 2017. An overview and perspective on social network monitoring. IISE Transactions 49 (3):354–65. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2016.1213468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., D. K. Lin, X. Niu, and Z. He. 2020. Performance evaluation method for network monitoring based on separable temporal exponential random graph models with application to the study of autocorrelation effects. Computers & Industrial Engineering 145 (1):106507. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106507.
   Google Scholar