https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-653X
References
- Box, G. E. P., and M. E. Muller. 1958. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29 (2):610–1. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177706645.
- Campbell, D. T., and D. W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56 (2):81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016.
- Deshon, R. P., D. Chan, and D. A. Weissbein. 1995. Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven’s advanced progressive matrices: Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants. Intelligence 21 (2):135–55. doi: 10.1016/0160-2896(95)90023-3.
- Ferrando, P. J., and U. Lorenzo-Seva. 2018. Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 78 (5):762–80. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308.
- Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern factor analysis. 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Hartig, J., C. Köhler, and A. Naumann. 2020. Using a multilevel random item Rasch model to examine item difficulty variance between random groups. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 62 (1):11–27.
- Jendryczko, D., L. Berkemeyer, and H. Holling. 2020. Introducing a computerized figural memory test based on automatic item generation: An analysis with the Rasch Poisson Counts Model. Frontiers in Psychology 11:945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00945.
- Lord, F. M., and M. R. Novick. 1968. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Rasch, G. 1960. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and achievement tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research (Expanded edition, 1980. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
- Raven, J. C. 1965. Advanced progressive matrices. Sets I and II. London: H. K. Lewis.
- Sellbom, M., and A. Tellegen. 2019. Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: Common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychological Assessment 31 (12):1428–41. doi: 10.1037/pas0000623.
- SOCR 2021. Statistics Online Computational Resource. School of Nursing, University of Michigan. Retrieved on 15th March 2021 from https://socr.umich.edu/HTML5/BivariateNormal/
- van Buuren, N., and T. H. J. Eggen. 2017. Latent-class-based item selection for computerized adaptive progress tests. Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing 5 (2):22–43. doi: 10.7333/1704-0502022.
- Vandenberg, R. J., and C. E. Lance. 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3 (1):4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002.
- Wang, C., H.-H. Chang, and J. Douglas. 2012. Combining CAT with cognitive diagnosis: A weighted item selection approach. Behavior Research Methods 44 (1):95–109. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0143-3.
- Wyse, A. E., and J. R. McBride. 2021. A framework for measuring the amount of adaptation of Rasch-based computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement 58 (1):83–103. doi: 10.1111/jedm.12267.