Smoothed empirical likelihood estimation and automatic variable selection for an expectile high-dimensional model

References

• Chang, J., C. Y. Tang, and T. T. Wu. 2018. A new scope of penalized empirical likelihood with high-dimensional estimating equations. Ann. Statist 46 (6B):3185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Xia, and L. Mao. 2021. Penalized empirical likelihood for high-dimensional generalized linear models. Statistics and Its Interface 14 (2):83–94. doi:10.4310/20-SII615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuperca, G. 2013. Empirical likelihood for nonlinear model with missing responses. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 83 (4):737–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuperca, G. 2016. Adaptive LASSO model selection in a multiphase quantile regression. Statistics 50 (5):1100–31. doi:10.1080/02331888.2016.1151427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuperca, G. 2021. Variable selection in high-dimensional linear model with possibly asymmetric errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 155:107112 doi:10.1016/j.csda.2020.107112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J, and R. Li. 2001. Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 (456):1348–60. doi:10.1198/016214501753382273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., C. Zou, Z. Wang, and Bin. Chen. 2014. Empirical likelihood for high-dimensional linear regression models. Metrika 77 (7):921–45. doi:10.1007/s00184-013-0479-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, C, and C. Y. Tang. 2012. Penalized empirical likelihood and growing dimensional general estimating equations. Biometrika 99 (3):703–16. doi:10.1093/biomet/ass014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., C. Park, and H. Choi. 2019. Penalized expectile regression: an alternative to penalized quantile regression. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 71 (2):409–38. doi:10.1007/s10463-018-0645-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T, and X. Yuan. 2016. Weighted quantile regression with missing covariates using empirical likelihood. Statistics 50 (1):89–113. doi:10.1080/02331888.2015.1033164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., C. Zou, and Z. Wang. 2013. Calibration of the empirical likelihood for high-dimensional data. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 65 (3):529–50. doi:10.1007/s10463-012-0384-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S, and S. Pang. 2017. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with response data missing at random. Open Mathematics 15 (1):317–30. doi:10.1515/math-2017-0028.
   Google Scholar
• Newey, W. K, and J. L. Powell. 1987. Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica 55 (4):818–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A. 1990. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann. Statist 18 (1):90–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A. 1991. Empirical likelihood for linear models. Ann. Statist 19 (4):1725–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, Ş, and O. Arslan. 2021. Empirical likelihood-MM (EL-MM) estimation for the parameters of a linear regression model. Statistics 55 (1):45–67. doi:10.1080/02331888.2021.1886297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J, and J. Lawless. 1994. Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann. Statist 22 (4):300–25.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y., L. Li, and Q. Lei. 2009. Empirical likelihood for linear regression models with missing responses. Statistics & Probability Letters 79 (11):1391–6. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y, and X. Zhang. 2011. Variable selection using penalized empirical likelihood. Science China Mathematics 54 (9):1829–45. doi:10.1007/s11425-011-4231-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood, Ben., Lan. Wang, and X.-H. Zhou. 2013. Weighted quantile regression for analyzing health care cost data with missing covariates. Statistics in Medicine 32 (28):4967–79. doi:10.1002/sim.5883. 23836597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C. Y, and C. Leng. 2010. Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood. Biometrika 97 (4):905–20. doi:10.1093/biomet/asq057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B.-H, and H.-Y. Liang. 2023. Empirical likelihood in single-index quantile regression with high dimensional and missing observations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 226:1–19. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2023.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. J, and Z. Zhu. 2011. Empirical likelihood for quantile regression models with longitudinal data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141 (4):1603–15. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Lan., Bo. Peng, J. Bradic, R. Li, and Y. Wu. 2020. A Tuning-free Robust and Efficient Approach to High-dimensional Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 115 (532):1700–14. doi:10.1080/01621459.2020.1840989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whang, Y. J. 2006. Smoothed empirical likelihood methods for quantile regression models. Econometric Theory 22 (2):173–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, L. 2009. Empirical likelihood for linear models with missing responses. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100 (7):1353–66. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2008.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Jia., H. Shi, L. Tian, and F. Xiao. 2019. Penalized generalized empirical likelihood in high-dimensional weakly dependent data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 171:270–83. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2018.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T, and Lei. Wang. 2020. Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 144:106888 doi:10.1016/j.csda.2019.106888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., D. Haziza, and C. Wu. 2022. Sample empirical likelihood and the design-based oracle variable selection theory. Statist. Sinica 32 (1):435–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Hui. 2006. The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101 (476):1418–29. doi:10.1198/016214506000000735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar