From Research to Publication: Understanding the Publishing Landscape in Architectural Studies

References

• Van Nuland, E. Sonya, and Kem A. Rogers, “Academic Nightmares: Predatory Publishing,” Anatomical Sciences Education 10, no. 4 (2017): 392–94. 10.1002/ase.1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislav Roudavski, “Transparency or Drama? Extending the Range of Academic Writing in Architecture and Design,” Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 3, no. 2 (2010): 111–33. 10.1386/jwcp.3.2.111_1.
   Google Scholar
• Jean-Sébastien Sauvé, Philippe Mongeon, and Vincent Larivière, “From Art to Science: A Bibliometric Analysis of Architectural Scholarly Production from 1980 to 2015,” PLoS One 17, no. 11 (2022): e0276840–e40. 10.1371/journal.pone.0276840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Carol Greene, Katherine A. O’Connor, Amy J. Good, Carolyn C. Ledford, Betty B. Peel, and Guili Zhang, “Building a Support System toward Tenure: Challenges and Needs of Tenure-Track Faculty in Colleges of Education,” Mentoring & Tutoring 16, no. 4 (2008): 429–47. 10.1080/13611260802433791.
   Google Scholar
• Katina Rogers, “Humanities Unbound: Supporting Careers and Scholarship Beyond the Tenure Track,” Digital Humanites Quarterly 9, no. 1 (2015). http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000198/000198.html.
   Google Scholar
• M Cecil Smith and Monica Leppma, “The Manuscript Completion Workshop: Supporting Professional Development of Tenure Track Faculty Members,” The journal of Faculty Development 31, no 2 (2017): 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Billie Myers, Erik Braun, Keicia Hawkins, Patrice Moulton, Michael Moulton, Terrie Poehl, and Michelle Morris, “Motivation and Perceptions of Research and Publication in Higher Education Faculty: A Phenomenological Study,” Research Issues in Contemporary Education 5, (2020): 94.
   Google Scholar
• Brian Paltridge and Sue Starfield, Getting Published in Academic Journals: Navigating the Publication Process (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Margaret Mering and Casey D Hoeve, “A Brief History to the Future of Open Access,” Serials Review 46, no. 4(2020): 300–04. 10.1080/00987913.2020.1850041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brian Paltridge, “Writing for Academic Journals in the Digital Era,” RELC Journal 51, no. 1 (2020): 147–57. doi: 10.1177/0033688219890359. 2020/04/01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Research and Innovation. “Implementing Our Open Access Policy.” @UKRI_News, https://www.ukri.org/what-we-do/supporting-healthy-research-and-innovation-culture/open-research/open-access-policies-review/implementing-our-open-access-policy/ (accessed December 7, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. “Council Calls for Transparent, Equitable, and Open Access to Scholarly Publications,” News Release, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/05/23/council-calls-for-transparent-equitable-and-open-access-to-scholarly-publications/(accesssed May 25, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Michael W Carroll, “Creative Commons and the Openness of Open Access,” The New England Journal of Medicine 368, no. 9 (2013): 789–91. 10.1056/NEJMp1300040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sophia Jui-An Pan, “Open Access Mega Journals: Development, Peer Review Mechanism, and Suggested Practices for the Academia,” Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 59, no. 3(2022): 311–46. 10.6120/JoEMLS.202211_59(3).0024.OR.AM.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen Pinfield, P. Willett, and S. Wakeling, “Open-Access Mega-Journals,” Cilip Update (2017). https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/115022/.
   Google Scholar
• Valerie Spezi, Simon Wakeling, Stephen Pinfield, Jenny Fry, Claire Creaser, and Peter Willett, ““Let the Community Decide”? The Vision and Reality of Soundness-Only Peer Review in Open-Access Mega-Journals,” Journal of Documentation 74, no. 1 (2018): 137–61. 10.1108/JD-06-2017-0092. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-06-2017-0092/full/pdf?title=let-the-community-decide-the-vision-and-reality-of-soundness-only-peer-review-in-open-access-mega-journals.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo J Dinis-Oliveira, “Open-Access Mega-Journals in Health and Life Sciences: What Every Researcher Needs to Know About This Publishing Model,” Current Drug Research Reviews Formerly: Current Drug Abuse Reviews 14, no. 1 (2022): 3–5. 10.2174/2589977514666220209101713. https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/120763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, A. Jaime, Panagiotis Tsigaris, and Aceil Al-Khatib, “Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-Publication Peer Review Infrastructure,” Publishing Research Quarterly 35, no. 3 (2019): 418–35. 10.1007/s12109-019-09654-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo-Christer Bjork, “Have the “Mega-Journals” Reached the Limits to Growth?” PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) 3, (2015): e981–e81. 10.7717/peerj.981. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4451030/pdf/peerj-03-981.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deborah C Poff, “Reflections on the Relationship of Research Integrity to Research Ethics in Publishing,” Journal of Academic Ethics 8, no. 4 (2010): 259–63. 10.1007/s10805-010-9126-8.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Rogerson, “Trustworthy Publishing,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 14, no. 1 (2016): null. 10.1108/JICES-01-2016-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Ray Spier, “The History of the Peer-Review Process,” Trends in Biotechnology 20, no. 8 (2002): 357–58. 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Silva, Jaime A Teixeira, Judit Dobránszki, Panagiotis Tsigaris, and Aceil Al-Khatib, “Predatory and Exploitative Behaviour in Academic Publishing: An Assessment,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 45, no. 6 (2019): 102071. 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vishnu Kumar Gupta, “Quality Control through Peer Review Process in Scholarly Communication: Review of Related Literature,” IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences 8, no. 3 (2017): 248. 10.21013/jmss.v8.n3.p3.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz Bornmann, “Scientific Peer Review,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 45, no. 1 (2011): 197–245. 10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112.
   Google Scholar
• Poulson‐Ellestad Kelsey, Scott Hotaling, Laura J. Falkenberg, and Patricia Soranno, “Illuminating a Black Box of the Peer Review System: Demographics, Experiences, and Career Benefits of Associate Editors,” Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 29, no. 1 (2020): 11–17. 10.1002/lob.10362.
   Google Scholar
• Erastus Karanja and Alisha D Malloy, “Editorial Board Memberships: A Report on the Status of the Leading Information Systems Journals,” Journal of International Technology and Information Management 31, no. 2(2022): 48–83. doi: 10.58729/1941-6679.1513.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdjoub Hayat, Bea Maas, Martin A. Nuñez, and Rassim Khelifa, “Recommendations for Making Editorial Boards Diverse and Inclusive,” Trends in Ecology & Evolution (Amsterdam) 37, no. 12 (2022): 1021–24. 10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society of Architectural Historians. “Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians: Submitting to Jsah.” 2023, accessed June 28, 2023, https://www.sah.org/publications-and-research/jsah.
   Google Scholar
• Sara Schumacher and Hillary B Veeder, “The Case for Print: Architecture Trade Journals as Pedagogical Tools for Disciplinary Knowledge,” Journal of Documentation 79, no. 3 (2023): 529–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2022-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E Garfield, “Journal Impact Factor: A Brief Review,” [In eng]. Cmaj 161, no. 8 (October 19 1999): 979–80. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/161/8/979.full.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. T. Bortolini and K. Baessler, “How Do We Measure the Worth of a Journal?” International Urogynecology Journal 34, no. 4 (2023): 787–88.10.1007/s00192-023-05509-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William M. Cockriel and James B. McDonald, “The Influence of Dispersion on Journal Impact Measures,” Scientometrics 116, no. 1(July2018): 609–22.10.1007/s11192-018-2755-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erin C. McKiernan, Lesley A. Schimanski, Carol Munoz Nieves, Lisa Matthias, Meredith T. Niles, and Juan P. Alperin, “Use of the Journal Impact Factor in Academic Review, Promotion, and Tenure Evaluations,” eLife 8, (2019).10.7554/eLife.47338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow Christine, Benjamin Gleason, and K. Bret Staudt Willet, “Social Scholarship Revisited: Changing Scholarly Practices in the Age of Social Media,” British Journal of Educational Technology 50, no. 3 (2019): 987–1004. 10.1111/bjet.12772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivek Kumar Singh, Satya Swarup Srichandan, and Hiran H. Lathabai, “ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How Much Do They Differ in Publications, Citations and Different Metrics and Why?” arXiv.org (2022). doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04264-2.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, Jaime A Teixeira, and Judit Dobránszki, “Multiple Versions of the H-Index: Cautionary Use for Formal Academic Purposes,” Scientometrics 115, no. 2 (2018): 1107–13. 10.1007/s11192-018-2680-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar