Buying their way in: Redistribution of campaign resources as a path to state legislative leadership for women

References

• Anzia, S. F., & Jackman, M. C. (2013). Legislative organization and the second face of power: Evidence from U.S. state legislatures. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, C. F. (2008). Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. The Stata Journal, 8(2), 299–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cann, D. (2008). Sharing the wealth: Member contributions and the exchange theory of party influence in the U.S. House of Representatives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for American Women and Politics. (2019). Women in state legislative leadership 2019. Retrieved from http://cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/stleg-leadership-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Crespin, M. H., & Deitz, J. L. (2010). If you can’t join ’em, beat ’em: The gender gap in individual donations to congressional candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 581–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder-Meyer, M. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 390–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currinder, M. (2009). Money in the house: Campaign funds and congressional party politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais, B. A., La Raja, R. J., & Kowal, M. S. (2015). The fates of challengers in U.S. House elections: The role of extended party networks in supporting candidates and shaping electoral outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 194–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, D. L. (2006). The impact of women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierzynski, A. (1992). Legislative party campaign committees in the American states. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Grossmann, M., & Dominguez, C. B. K. (2009). Party coalitions and interest group networks. American Politics Research, 37(5), 767–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. L. (1996). Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, K. E., & Moncrief, G. F. (2013). Legislative politics in the states. In V. Gray, R. L. Hanson, & T. Kousser (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (10th ed., pp. 163–207). Los Angeles, CA: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlig, E. S., & Larson, B. A. (2012). Congressional parties, institutional ambition, and the financing of majority control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnson, P. S. (2009). The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1207–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex stereotypes and response to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, 57(4), 65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K. (2007). Crystal elephants and committee chairs: Campaign contributions and leadership races in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Politics Research, 35(3), 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K., & Krause, G. A. (2012). The diversity paradox: Political parties, legislatures, and the organizational foundations of representation in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in committee hearing debates. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchens, K. E., & Swers, M. L. (2016). Why aren’t there more republican women in congress? Gender, partisanship, and fundraising support in the 2010 and 2012 elections. Politics & Gender, 12(4), 648–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koger, G., Masket, S., & Noel, H. (2009). Partisan webs: Information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 633–653.
   Google Scholar
• Krasno, J. S., Green, D. P., & Cowden, J. A. (1994). The dynamics of campaign fundraising in House elections. The Journal of Politics, 56(2), 459–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J. L., & Pearson, K. (2008). The primary reason for women’s underrepresentation? Reevaluating the conventional wisdom. The Journal of Politics, 70(1), 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieb, D. A. (2019, January 26). Women make big gains in state capitols, but men still rule. The Associated Press. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/2c52fb7e5f574c13be7751f129d0c718.
   Google Scholar
• McClurg, S. D., & Young, J. K. (2011). Political networks: Editors’ introduction: A relational political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(1), 39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, M. M. (2013). Methods for analyzing proportions (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/22553
   Google Scholar
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2011). Women in state legislatures: 2011 legislative session. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/legislators-staff/legislators/womens-legislative-network/women-in-state-legislatures-2011.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Money in Politics. (2017). FollowtheMoney. Retrieved from https://www.followthemoney.org
   Google Scholar
• Niven, D. (1998). Party elites and women candidates. Women & Politics, 19(2), 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, T. L. (2012). How women represent women: Political parties, gender and representation in the state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, T. L. (2014). Women state legislators and representation: The role of political parties and institutions. State and Local Government Review, 46(2), 146–155.
   Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, L. W. (2012). The influence of campaign contributions in state legislatures: The effects of institutions and politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richman, J. (2010). The logic of legislative leadership: Preferences, challenges, and the speaker’s powers. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, A. (2008). Engines of democracy: Politics and policymaking in state legislatures. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. A. (1990). The party network: The robust organization of Illinois Republicans. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, R. M., Masket, S. E., & Dulio, D. A. (2012). 527 committees and the political party network. American Politics Research, 40(1), 60–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. (2013). Women in the club: Gender and policy making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viebeck, E. (2016, September 13). How these powerful women learned to love fundraising. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/09/13/how-these-powerful-women-learned-to-love-fundraising/?utm_term=.2b9368fc6d86
   Google Scholar