9
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

What Counts as Reading: Limits to Certainty in Assessment

Pages 265-292 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • ALBRITTON, ROGERS. “On Wittgenstein's use of the term ‘criterion’.” In Wittgenstein's philosophical investigations, editedby G. Pitcher. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1968.
  • BAR-HILLEL, YEHOSHUA. “Indexical expressions.” Mind 63 (July 1954): 359–379.
  • CALFEE, ROBERT C., and DRUM, PRISCILLA A. “Learning to read: Theory, research and practice.” Curriculum Inquiry 8, no. 3 (Fall 1978): 183–249.
  • CANFIELD, JOHN V. “Criteria and rules of language.” Philosophical Review 78, no. 1 (1974): 70–87.
  • DUROST, WALTER; BIXLER, HAROLD; WRIGHTSTONE, J. WAYNE; PRESCOTT, GEORGE; BALOW, IRVING. “Teacher's directions.” In Metropolitan achievement tests, Primary 1, Forms F, G, and H. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970.
  • EBEL, ROBERT L. Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
  • GARVER, NEWTON. “Wittgenstein on criteria.” In Knowledge and experience, edited by C.D. Rollins. Pittsburgh, Penn.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1966.
  • GOODMAN, KENNETH s. “Analysis of oral reading miscues: Applied psycholinguistics.” In Psycholinguistics and reading, edited by Frank Smith. Toronto: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
  • GRIFFIN, MARGARET, and HUMPHREY, FRANK. “Task and talk.” In The study of children's functional language and education in the early years, edited by R. Shuy and M. Griffen. Final report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Arlington, Va.: Centre for Applied Linguistics, 1978.
  • GUION, ROBERT M. Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1974.
  • HACKER, P. M. S. Insight and illusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.
  • HEAP, JAMES L. “Versthen, language and warrants.” Sociological Quarterly 18 (1977): 177–184.
  • HEAP, JAMES L.. “Rumpelstiltskin: The organization of preference in a reading lesson.” Analytic Sociology 2, no. 2, Card 1 (1979).
  • HEAP, JAMES L.. “On Wittgenstein, criteria and reading.” Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education and University of Toronto, Toronto, 1980.
  • HUNTER, J. K. M. “Critical notice of P. M. S. Hacker, Insight and Illusion.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 1 (1974): 201–211.
  • JEFFERSON, GAIL, and SCHENKEIN, JIM. “Some sequential negotiations in conversation: Unexpanded and expanded versions of projected action sequences.” In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, edited by J. Schenkein. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • LOUCH, A. R. Explanation and human action. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1966.
  • MEHAN HUGH. “Accomplishing classroom lessons.” In Language use and school performance, edited by A. Cicourel, K.H. Jennings, S.H.M. Jennings, K.C.W. Leiter, R. MacKay, H. Mehan, and D.R. Roth. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
  • MEHAN HUGH.. Learning lessons. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.
  • SINGER, HARRY, and RUDDELL, ROBERT. Theoretical models and processes of reading. 2nd ed. Newark, Del.: IRA Press, 1976.
  • SPECHT, ERNEST K. The foundations of Wittgenstein's late philosophy. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1969.
  • TRUZZI, MARCELLO. Verstehen: Subjective understanding in the social sciences. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1974.
  • WEBER, MAX. Economy and society. New York: Bedminister Press, 1968.
  • WHITE, ALLAN R. The philosophy of action. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1968.
  • WITTGENSTEIN, LUDWIG. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
  • WITTGENSTEIN, LUDWIG.. The blue and brown books. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
  • ZANER, RICHARD. “The phenomenology of epistemic claims: And its bearing on the essence of philosophy.” In Phenomenology and social reality, edited by M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970.
  • ZANER, RICHARD.. “Examples & possibles: A criticism of Husserl's theory of free-fantasy variation.” Research in Phenomenology 3 (1973): 29–43.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.