The Tug-Of-War Nobody Wins: Allocation of Educational Resources for Handicapped, Gifted, and “Typical” Students

REFERENCES

• BALDWIN, A. Y., GEAR, G. H., and LUOTO, L. J. Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children. 1978.
   Google Scholar
• BARBE, W. B. “Homogeneous grouping for for gifted children.” In Psychology and education of the gifted: Selected readings, W. B. Barbe, Ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965, pp. 426–431.
   Google Scholar
• BARBE, W. B., and FRIERSON, E. C. “Teaching the gifted: a new frame of reference.” In Psychology and education of the gifted, W. B. Barb and J. S. Renzulli, Eds. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• BARRETT, B. H. “Communitization and the measured message of normal behavior.” In Teaching the severely handicapped, Vol. IV, York, R. L. and Edgar, E., Eds. Seattle: American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• BEREDAY, G. Z. F. “Opposition to education of the gifted in the United States.” In Psychology and education of the gifted: Selected readings, W. B. Barbe, Ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965, pp. 473–487.
   Google Scholar
• BLATT, B. In and out of mental retardation. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981. “Budget proposals threaten future of special education.” Update, 12(5) (1981): 1.
   Google Scholar
• CARTWRIGHT, G. P., and CARTWRIGHT, C. A. “Definitions and classification approaches.” In Retardation: Issues, assessment and intervention, Neisworth, J. T., and Smith, R. M., Eds. New York: McGraw-Hall, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• CARTWRIGHT, G. P., CARTWRIGHT, C. A., and WARD, M. E. Educating special learners. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1981.
   Google Scholar
• CASSIVI, D. “Special programs for the gifted: A critique of some arguments.” McGill Journal of Education 14(2) 1979: 189–198.
   Google Scholar
• CUSHENBERRY, D. C., and HOWELL, H. Reading and the gifted child. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• DELISLE, J. R., REIS, S. M., and GUBBINS, E. J. “The revolving door identification and programming model.” Exceptional Children 48(2) (October 1981): 152–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DELLAS, M., and GALER, E. L. “Identification of creativity: The individual.” Psychology Bulletin 73(1) (1973): 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• DENO, E. “Special education as developmental capital.” Exceptional Children (November 1970): 229–237.
   Google Scholar
• DREWS, E. M. “Beyond curriculum.” In Educating the Ablest, J. C. Gowan and E. P. Torrance, Eds. Itasca, I: F. E. Peacock Publishers, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• DUNN, L. M. “Special education for the mildly retarded-is much of it justifiable?” Exceptional Children (September 1968): 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• ESPOSITO, D. “Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability groupings: Principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments.” Review of Educational Research (Spring 1973): 163–179.
   Google Scholar
• FELDMAN, D. “Toward a non-elitist conception of giftedness.” Phi Delta Kappan 60(9) (May 1979).
   Google Scholar
• FENSTERMACHER, G. D. “To be or not to be gifted: What is the question?” The Elementary School Journal 82(3) (1982): 299–303.
   Google Scholar
• FISHER, R. J. Learning How to Learn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1972.
   Google Scholar
• FOSTER, G., and APPLETON, M. “Special education in Holland.” Special Education: Forward Trends 9(2) (1982): 19.
   Google Scholar
• FOX, L. H. “Programs for the gifted and talented: An overview.” In The Gifted and talented: Their education and development, A. H. Pessow, Ed. The 78th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• GARDNER, J. W. Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too? New York: Harper and Row, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• GETZELS, J. W., and JACKSON, P. W. “The meaning of ‘giftedness’—an examination of an expanding concept.” Phi Delta Kappan 40(2) (November 1958): 75–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOLD, M. W. “An alternative definition of mental retardation (1975),” in M. W. Gold, “Did I say that?” Articles and commentary on the try another way system. Champaign, IL: Research Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• GOTTLIEB, J. “Mainstreaming: Fulfilling the promise.” Journal of Mental Deficiency 86(2) (September 1981).
   Google Scholar
• GREAT BRITAIN: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, Report of the committee of enquiry into the education of handicapped children and young people (The Warnock Report). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (H.M.S.O.), 1978.
   Google Scholar
• GROSSMAN, H. J., Ed. Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• HERTZBERG, A., and STONE, E. F. Schools are for children: An american approach to the open classroom. New York: Schocken Books, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• HOBBS, N. Issues in the Classification of Children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1975.
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSON, D. W., and JOHNSON, R. “Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning.” Journal of Research and Development in Education 12(1) (1978): 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• JOHNSON, D. W., SKON, L., and JOHNSON, R. “Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic conditions on children's problem-solving performance. American Educational Research Journal 17(1) (Spring 1980): 83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOHNSON, G. O. “Special education for mentally handicapped—A paradox.” Exceptional Children 19 (1962): 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• JONES, R. L., Ed. Mainstreaming and the minority child. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• LARRY P. versus WILSON RILES, NOC–71–2270 RFP, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (June 21, 1972).
   Google Scholar
• MACKINNON, D. W. “The nature and nurture of creative talents.” American Psychologist 17 (1962): 484–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARLAND, S. P. Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education and Background Papers. Submitted to the U.S. Office of Education, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• MERCER, J. R. Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• MILLS versus D. C. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 348 F. SUPP. 866 (D.D.C. 1972). NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GIFTED CHILDREN. Teaching Able and gifted children: A study of initial and in-service teacher training in England, Scotland and Wales 1981–82. London, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• NELSON, J. B., and CLELAND, D. L. “The role of the teacher of gifted and creative children.” In Psychology and Education of the Gifted, W. B. Barbe and J. S. Renzulli, Eds. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• OLSTAD, D. “The pursuit of excellence is not elitism.” Phi Delta Kappan (November 1978): 185–187.
   Google Scholar
• ONTARIO LEGISLATURE, Bill 82: An Act to Amend the Education Act, 1974. Toronto, Ontario: Queen's Park, December 2, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• PASSMORE, B. “New awareness of gifted pupils' needs.” The Times Educational Supplement, November 5, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CHILDREN versus PENNSYLVANIA, 334 F. SUPP. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971) and 343 F. SUPP. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972).
   Google Scholar
• PERKINS, S. A. “Problems and issues in special education.” Education Canada 19(3) (1979): 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• POCKLINGTON, K. “Integration—a lesson from America?” Special Education: Forward Trends 7(3) (1980): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• RAWLYK, S. A. “Some fundamental issues in funding special education.” Education Canada 17(1) (1977): 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• REMLEY, A. G. “All the best for the brightest.” The Progressive 45(5) (May 1981).
   Google Scholar
• RENZULLI, J. S. The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted an talented. Wethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• RENZULLI, J. S. “What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition.” Phi Delta Kappan (November 1978).
   Google Scholar
• RENZULLI, J. S., and SMITH, L. H. “Revolving door: A truer turn for the gifted.” Learning (October 1980): 91–93.
   Google Scholar
• RYAN, W. Blaming the victim. NY: Random House, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• SAPON-SHEVIN, M., and SHEVIN, M. “Issues for parents: Implications of the gifted label. In A parent's guide to the education of preschool gifted children, Felker, R. M., Ed. Washington, DC: Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted and the National Association of State Boards of Education, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• SCHLICHTER, C. L. “The multiple talent approach in mainstream and gifted programs.” Exceptional Children 48(2) (October 1981): 144–150.
   Google Scholar
• SHARAN, S. “Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes and and ethnic relations.” Review of Education Research 50(2) (Summer 1980): 241–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLAVIN, R. E. “Cooperative learning.” Review of Educational Research 50(2) (Summer 1980): 315–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TANNENBAUM, A. J. “A backward and forward glance at the gifted.” The National Elementary Principal 51(5) (February 1972): 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• TANNENBAUM, A. J. “Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate concern about the gifted.” In The gifted and the talented: Their education and development A. H. Pessow, Ed. The 78th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• TERMAN, L. M. “Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children,” Vol. I of Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• TERMAN, L. M., and ODEN, M. H. The Gifted Child Grows Up. Vol. IV of Genetic Studies of Genius. Terman, L. M. (Ed.). Stanford. Stanford University Press, 1947.
   Google Scholar
• TREHERNE, D., and RAWLYK, S. “Canadian legislative processes.” McGill Journal of Education 14(3) (1979): 265–273.
   Google Scholar
• TYERMAN, M. J. “Aspects of special education in Western Europe.” McGill Journal of Education 14(3) (1979): 289–303.
   Google Scholar
• WHITMORE, J. R. Giftedness, conflict and underachievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1980.
   Google Scholar
• WILSON, A., and HANSON, F. Consumer's guide to Bill 82. Book in preparation, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• WILSON, B. J., and SCHMITS, D. W. “What's new in ability grouping?” Phi Delta Kappan (April 1978): 535–536.
   Google Scholar
• WOLFENSBERGER, W. The Principle of Normalization in Human Service. National Institute of Mental Retardation, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• “1981 Education Act will come into force April 1, 1983.” The Times Educational Supplement, October 29, 1982.
   Google Scholar