4
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Book Review/Dialogue

, &
Pages 205-235 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • APPLEBY, P.H. (1949). Policy and administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  • ASHTON, P. T., WEBB, R. B., and DODA, N. (1983). A study of Teachers' sense of efficacy: Final report. Gainesville: University of Florida.
  • AXELROD, R. (1977). “Argumentation in foreign policy settings.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21: 727–756.
  • BACHARACH, S. B., and LAWLER, E. J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • BALDRIDGE, V. (1971). Power and conflict in the university New York: John Wiley.
  • BARTLETT, J. (1980). Oliver Cromwell. In E. M. Beck (Ed.), Familiar Quotations (p. 272). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
  • BELASCO, J. A., and ALUTTO, J. A. (1972). “Decisional participation and teacher satisfaction.” Educational Administration Quarterly, 8: 44–58.
  • BLASE, J., and PEJAK, E. (1986). “The impact of Teachers' work life on personal life: A qualitative analysis.” Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 32, 4: 307–322.
  • BLASE, J. (1989). The Teachers' political orientation vis à vis the principal: The micropolitics of the school. In J. Hannaway and R. Crowson (Eds.), The politics cf reforming school administration (pp. 113–126). New York: Falmer Press.
  • BLAU, P. M. (1956). Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random House.
  • BLUMBERG, A., and GREENFIELD, W. (1980). The effective principal: Perspectives on school leadership. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • BOYD, W. L. (Summer 1987). “Public education's last hurrah?: Schizophrenia, amnesia, and ignorance in school politics.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis: 85–100.
  • BOYD, W. L., and HARTMAN, W. (1989). The politics of educational productivity. In D. H. Monk and J. Underwood (Eds.), Micro-level school finance issues and implications for policy (pp. 271–308). Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
  • CARNEGIE FORUM ON EDUCATION AND THE ECONOMY. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
  • CASTLES, F. G., and MCKINLAY, R. D. (April, 1979). “Public welfare provision, Scandinavia, and the sheer futility of the sociological approach to politics.” British Journal cf Political Science: 157–171.
  • CISTONE, P.J. (1975). The recruitment and socialization of school board members. In P.J. Cistone (Ed.) (pp. 47–61). Understanding school boards. Lexington: D. C. Heath.
  • CONLEY, S., SCHMIDLE, T., and SHEDD, J. (1988). “Teacher participation in the management of school systems.” Teachers College Record, 90, 2: 259–279.
  • CONWAY, J. (1984). “The myth, mystery and mastery of participative decision making in education.” Educational Administration Quarterly, 20, 3: 11–40.
  • CORWIN, R. G. (1974). Education in crisis: A sociological analysis cf schools and universities in transition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • DACHLER, H., and WILPERT, B. (1978). “Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 1–31.
  • DEWEY, J. (1963). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
  • FISHER, R., and URY, W. (1982). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • FULLAN, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Toronto: OISE Press.
  • FRIEDRICH, C. J. (1963). Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
  • GAUS, J. M. (1947). Reflections on public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
  • GLASMAN, N.S. (1986). Evaluation-based leadership. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • GOODLAD, J. I. (1983). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • GREENFIELD, T. B. (1975). Theory about organization: A new perspective and its implications for schools. In M. Hughes (Ed.) (pp. 71–99). Administering education: International challenge. London: Athlone.
  • GRIFFITHS, D. E. (1959). Administrative theory New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
  • GUTMANN, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • HANSON, M. (1981). Organizational control in educational systems: A case study of governance in schools. In S. M. Bacharach (Ed.) (pp. 245–276). Organizational behavior in schools and school districts. New York: Praeger.
  • HERRING, E. P. (1940). Presidential leadership. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
  • HIRSCHMAN, A., (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • HOYLE, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
  • HUBERMAN, M., and MILES, M. (1984). Innovation up close. New York: Plenum.
  • MANGHAM, I. (1979). The politics cf organizational change. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  • MANZER, R. (1988). “The political theory and practice of Canadian school trustee representation.” Canadian Public Administration, 31, 1: 433–446.
  • MASON, R. B. (September 15, 1988). “One lesson from Britain that Canada doesn't need to learn.” (Toronto) Globe and Mail, p. A7.
  • MAYES, B. T., and ALLEN, R. W. (1977). “Toward a definition of organizational politics.” Academy cf Management Review, 2: 672–678.
  • MELCHER, A. (1976). “Participation: A critical review of research findings.” Human Resource Management, 15, 2: 12–21.
  • NATIONAL GOVERNORs' ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR POLICY AND RESEARCH. (1986). Time for results: The governors' 1991 report on education. Washington, D.C.
  • ODDEN, A., and MARSH, D. (1989). State education reform implementation: A framework for analysis. In J. Hannaway and R. Crowson (Eds.) (pp. 41–59). The politics af reforming school administration. New York: Falmer Press. (This is the second yearbook of the Politics of Education Association.)
  • PFEFFER, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Boston: Pitman.
  • RUTHERFORD, W. L. (September, 1985). “School principals as effective leaders.” Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 1: 31–34.
  • SAUNDERS, P. (1981). Urban politics: A sociological interpretation. London: Hutchinson.
  • SAXES, R. W. (1975). School-community interaction. Berkeley: McCutchan.
  • SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E. E. (September, 1942). “Partisan politics and administrative agencies.” Annals of the American Academy cf Political and Social Sciences, 222: 29–32.
  • SCHWILLE, J., PORTER, A., and GANT, M. (1980). “Content decision making and the politics of education.” Educational Administration Quarterly, XVI, 2: 21–40.
  • SIMON, R. (1983). “But who will let you do it? Counter-hegemonic possibilities for work education.” Journal of Education, 165, 3: 235–256.
  • SUMMERFIELD, H. (1971). The neighborhood-based politics cf education. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.
  • TOWNSEND, R. G. (1986). “Traditions of reform: A world tour of education.” Politics of Education Bulletin, 13, 2: 17–23.
  • TOWNSEND, R. G. (1988). They politick f or schools. Toronto: OISE Press.
  • TOWNSEND, R. G. (1989). The curricula of educational politics and policy: Promoting the careers of 81 syllabi. In D. H. Layton and J. D. Scribner (Eds.), Teaching educational politics and policy, Tempe, Arizona: University Council for Educational Administration.
  • TUCKER, H. J., and ZEIGLER, L. H. (1976). The politics cf educational governance: An overview. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • WALBERG, H. J., and GENOVA, W. J. (1982). “Staff, school, and workshop influences on knowledge use in educational improvement efforts.” Journal cf Educational Research, 76: 67–80.
  • WALLER, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • WILLINSKY, J. (1988). The well-tempered tongue: The politics cf standard English in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • WIRT, F.M., and KIRST, M. W. (1988). Schools in conflict (3rd Edition). Berkeley: McCutchan. (Originally published in 1970 as The political and social foundations of education.)
  • WOOD, G. H. (1984). “Education in a democracy: Transformation or reproduction?” Educational Theory, 34,3: 219–239.
  • Y GASSET, O. (1932). Revolt cf the masses. New York: W. W. Norton.

REFERENCES

REFERENCE

  • GLASER, B. G. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In G.J. McCall and J. L. Simmons, Eds. (pp. 216–227), Issues in participant observation: A text and reader. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.