3
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reading as Cultural Activities: Enabling and Reflective Texts

Pages 11-39 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Austin, R. P. 1938. The stoichedon style of inscription. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Beaugrande, R. 1981. Design criteria for process models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 16: 261–315.
  • Bloome, D. 1983. Reading as a social process. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 2: 165–195.
  • Bradley, R., and Swartz, N. 1979. Possible worlds. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Cole, M., and Scribner, S. 1974. Culture & thought. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Collins, J. 1982. Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14: 429–437.
  • Flower, L., and Hayes, J. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 31: 21–32.
  • Frederiksen, C. 1977. Semantic processing units in understanding text. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Toronto: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Gaur, A. 1984. A history of writing. London: The British Library.
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Goodman, K. S. 1985. Unity in reading. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (3rd ed.), (pp. 813–840). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Goody, J. 1986. The logic of writing and the organization of society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goody, J. and Watt, I. 1968. The consequences of literacy. In J. Goody (Ed.), Literacy in traditional societies, second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gough, P. B. 1985. One second of reading. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, third edition, (pp. 661–688). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Green, J. L. 1983. Research on teaching as a linguistic process: A state of the art. Review of Research in Education, 10: 151–252.
  • Gurwitsch, A. 1964. The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
  • Hacker, P. M. S. 1972. Insight and illusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Haliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
  • Havelock, E. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Heap, J. L. 1977. Toward a phenomenology of reading. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 8: 103–113.
  • Heap, J. L. 1985. Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 15: 245–279.
  • Heap, J. L. 1988. Reading as rational action: Functioning and literacy in daily life. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference annual meetings, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Heap, J. L. 1990. Applied ethnomethodology: Looking for the local rationality of reading activities. Human Studies, 13: 39–72.
  • Husserl, E. 1962. Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. New York: Collier Books.
  • Husserl, E. 1970. The crisis of european sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  • Kintch, W., and van Dijk, T. 1978. Toward A Model Of Text Comprehension And Production. Psychological Review, 85: 363–394.
  • Kirsch, I. S. and Jungeblut, A. 1986. Literacy: Profiles of America's young adults. Princeton, N.J.: NAEP
  • Kroeber, A. L. and Parsons, T. 1976. The concepts of culture and of social system. In F. C. Gamst and E. Norbeck, (Eds.), Ideas of culture: Sources and uses (pp. 115–118). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • LaBerge, D., and Samuels, S. J. 1985. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (3rd ed.), (pp. 689–718). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Levine, K. 1986. The social context of literacy. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Louch, A. R. 1969. Explanation and human action. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Marsh, R. M. 1967. Comparative sociology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
  • Mathews, M. M. 1966. Teaching to read: Historically reconsidered. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McDermott, R. P. 1985. Achieving school failure: An anthropological approach to illiteracy and social stratification. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (3rd ed.) (pp. 558–594). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Morrison, K. 1987. Stabilizing the text: The institutionalization of knowledge in historical and philosophic forms of argument. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 12: 242–274.
  • Olson, D. R. 1977. From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47: 257–281.
  • Parsons, T. 1937. The structure of social action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Popper, K. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
  • Richler, M. 1959. The apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz. Markham, Ontario: Penguin Books Canada Ltd.
  • Ruddell, R. B. and Speaker, R. 1985. The interactive reading process: A model. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (3rd ed.) (pp. 751–793). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In B. C. Bruce and W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. 1985. Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (3rd ed.), (pp. 722–750). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
  • Samuels, S. J., and Kamil, M. L. 1984. Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, and P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 185–224). New York: Longman.
  • Schank, R. C. 1984. The cognitive computer. Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
  • Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understandings. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
  • Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1978. The earliest precursor of writing. Scientific American, 37: 50–59.
  • Schutz, A. 1962. The collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Schutz, A. 1964. The collected papers II: Studies in social theory. The Hague: Martinus NijhofF.
  • Shils, E., and Van Den Haag, E. 1963. Mass culture. In H. M. Ruitenbeck, (Ed.), Varieties of modern social theory, Chap. 10. London: E. P. Dutton and Co., Inc.
  • Singer, H., and Ruddell, R. B., (Eds.). 1985. Theoretical models and processes of reading, third edition. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
  • Smith, D. 1984. Textually mediated social organization. International Social Science Journal, 36: 59–75.
  • Sticht, T. 1977. Comprehending reading at work. In M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: LEA.
  • van Dijk, T., and Kintsch, W. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. Toronto: Academic Press.
  • Weber, M. 1949. The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  • Which page 1 news story did you read first this morning? 1987. New York Times, February 17, p. 15.
  • Wilson, T. 1970. Normative and interpretive paradigms in sociology. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life. Chicago: Aldine Press.
  • Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.