562
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Content selection in advanced courses

&

References

  • Alinsky, S. (1989). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. New York: Vintage.
  • Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. Boston: Routledge & K. Paul.
  • Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society: The educational transformation of global culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
  • Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.
  • Boler, M. (Ed.). (2004). Democratic dialogue in education: Troubling speech, disturbing silence. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2000). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61–100). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
  • Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cockling, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academies Press.
  • Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. J., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., , … Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 209–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
  • Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
  • Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–271.
  • College Entrance Examination Board (2010). Government and politics: United States, comparative, course description. New York: Author.
  • College Entrance Examination Board (2011). The 7th annual AP report to the nation. New York: Author.
  • Deng, Z., & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 66–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1939). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt.
  • Dillon, J. T. (Ed.). (1994). Deliberation in education and society. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Durkheim, E. (1961). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Collier.
  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination (3rd ed.). Columbus: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Fenton, E. (1967). The new social studies. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (Eds.). (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice (Vol. 112). New York: National Society for the Study of Education.
  • Flanagan, C. A. (2013). Teenage citizens: The political theories of the young. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Frazer, E. (2002). Citizenship education: Anti-political culture and political education in Britain. In W. C. Parker (Ed.), Education for democracy: Contexts, curricula, and assessments (pp. 27–42). Greenwich: Information Age.
  • Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Giroux, H. A. (1979). Toward a new sociology of curriculum. Educational Leadership, 37(3), 248–252.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
  • Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory ( P. J. Perron & F. H. Collins, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: Freeman.
  • Hunt, M. P., & Metcalf, L. E. (1968). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and social understanding (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
  • Jackson, P. W. (1980). Curriculum and its discontents. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(2), 159–172.
  • Kelly, G. J., Luke, A., & Green, J. (2008). What counts as knowledge in educational settings: Disciplinary knowledge, assessment, and curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 32, vii–x.
  • Kliebard, H. M. (1965). Structure of the disciplines as an educational slogan. Teachers College Record, 66(7), 598–603.
  • Labaree, D. F. (2012). School syndrome: Understanding the USA's magical belief that schooling can somehow improve society, promote access, and preserve advantage. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(2), 143–163.
  • Lacey, T. (2010). Access, rigor, and revenue in the history of the Advanced Placement program. In P. M. Sadler, G. Sonnert, R. H. Tai, & K. Klopfenstein (Eds.), AP: A critical examination of the Advanced Placement program (pp. 17–48). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  • Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2011). The main course, not dessert. Retrieved from Buck Institute for Education: http://www.bie.org/tools/freebies/main_course_not_dessert/
  • Loewen, J. W. (2009). Teaching what really happened: How to avoid the tyranny of textbooks and get students excited about doing history. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Mathews, J. ( August 28, 2009). Will Advance Placement replace the SAT? The Washington Post. Retrieved February13, 2010 at http://voices.washingtonpost.com/class-struggle/2009/08/will_advanced_placement_replac.html)
  • Mitchell, K. (2003). Educating the national citizen in neoliberal times: From the multicultural self to the strategic cosmopolitan. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(4), 387–403.
  • Morrissett, I. (Ed.). (1967). Concepts and the structure in the new social science curricula. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • NCES ( National Center for Educational Statistics). (2009). High school transcript study. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
  • National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schoolsexecutive summary. Washington: National Academy Press.
  • Newmann, F., & Associates (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Oliver, D. W. (1957). The selection of content in the social sciences. Harvard Educational Review, 27, 271–300.
  • Parker, W. C. (2011). Constructing public schooling today: Derision, multiculturalism, nationalism. Educational Theory, 61(4), 413–432.
  • Parker, W., Lo, J., Yeo, A. J., Valencia, S. W., Nguyen, D., Abbott, R. D., Nolen, S. B., Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an Advanced Placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424–1459.
  • Parker, W. C., Mosborg, S., Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. J., Wilkerson, J., & Abbott, R. (2011). Rethinking advanced high school coursework: Tackling the depth/breadth tension in the AP US Government and Politics course. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(4), 533–559.
  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
  • Phenix, P. H. (1962). The use of the disciplines as curriculum content. The Educational Forum, 26(3), 273–280.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2015). Educational experience as lived: Knowledge, history, alterity (pp. 36–46). New York: Routledge.
  • Ravitz, J. (2009). Summarizing findings and looking ahead to a new generation of PBL research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 4–11.
  • Reid, W. A. (2006). The pursuit of curriculum: Schooling and the public interest. Greenwich: Information Age.
  • Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Tai, R. H., & Klopfenstein, K. (Eds.). (2010). AP: A critical examination of the Advanced Placement program. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  • Scheurman, G. (2008). Poetry and postholes. Social Education, 72(7), 350–353.
  • Schneider, J. (2011). Excellence for all. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6–30). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review, 78(1), 1–23.
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). A time for telling. Cognition and instruction, 16(4), 475–522.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
  • Spring, J. (2006). Pedagogies of globalization: The rise of the educational security state. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Taba, H. (1945). General techniques of curriculum planning. In N. B. Henry (Ed.), American education in the postwar period. 45th yearbook, National Society for the Study of Education (Vol. 1, pp. 80–115). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Thornton, S. J., & Barton, K. C. (2010). Can history stand alone? Drawbacks and blind spots of a “disciplinary” curriculum. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2471–2495.
  • Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479.
  • Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Westbury, I. (2008). Curriculum in practice. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillion (Eds.), Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 1–4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Whitty, G. (2010). Revisiting school knowledge: Some sociological perspectives on new school curricula. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 28–45.
  • Wraga, W. G., & Hlebowitsh, P. S. (2003). Toward a renaissance in curriculum theory and development in the USA. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 425–437.
  • Young, M. F. D. (Ed.). (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.
  • Young, M. F. D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London: Routledge.
  • Young, M. F. D. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–118.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.