Fabricating response: Preservice elementary teachers remediating response to The Circuit through 3D printing and design

References

• Chang, E., Lim, M., & Kim, M. (2012). Three approaches to teaching art methods courses: Child art, visual culture, and issues-based art education. Art Education, 65(3), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519172
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-H. (2017). Developing a pre-engineering curriculum for 3D printing skills for high school technology education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2941–2958. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00729a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
   Google Scholar
• Corbitt, A., Wargo, J. M., & O’Connor, C. (2022). Encountering unnatural e-literature: Tracing interpretation and relationality across multimodal response and digital annotation. English in Education, 56(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1933424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, M. B. (2016). The Trump effect: The impact of the presidential campaign on our nation’s schools. Southern Poverty Law Center. https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/splc_the_trump_effect.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., Robinson, K. H., Lovvorn, J. F., Smith, B. E., Alvey, T., Mo, E., Uccelli, P., & Proctor, C. P. (2015). Fifth-grade students’ digital retellings and the Common Core: Modal use and design intentionality. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1086/681969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danticat, E. (2015). Mama’s nightingale: A story of immigration and separation (L. Staub, Illus.). Dial Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrick, A. A., & Fattal, L. (2018). Exploring exemplars in elementary teacher education: Arts-centered instruction for social justice. Social Studies Research and Practice, 13(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-07-2017-0039
   Google Scholar
• Doering, A., Beach, R., & O’Brien, D. (2007). Infusing multimodal tools and digital literacies into an English education program. English Education, 40(1), 41–60. https://library.ncte.org/journals/ee/issues/v40-1/6425
   Google Scholar
• Elrod, R. E. (2016). Classroom innovation through 3D printing. Library Hi Tech News, 33(3), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-12-2015-0085
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, S., & Minshall, T. (2019). Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1983). The importance of the act of reading (L. Slover, Trans.) Journal of Education, 165(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500103
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, J., & Kerr, S. (2016). Theorizing the use of aesthetic texts in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1211047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2013). Why the arts don’t do anything: Toward a new vision for cultural production in education. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.1.a78q39699078ju20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaztambide-Fernández, R., Kraehe, A. M., & Carpenter, B. S., IIII. (2018). The arts as White property: An introduction to race, racism and the arts in education. In A. M. Kraehe, R. Gaztambide-Fernández, & B. S. Carpenter (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of race and the arts in education (pp. 1–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65256-6_1
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014). Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Analytical Chemistry, 86(7), 3240–3253. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403397r
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). Arts education and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 626–646). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, F. (1997). The circuit: Stories from the life of a migrant child. Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jocius, R. (2013). Exploring adolescents’ multimodal responses to The Kite Runner: Understanding how students use digital media for academic purposes. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5(1), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-5-1-4
   Google Scholar
• JR. (2017). Giant picnic [Art installation]. In Migrants, picnic across the border. JR Art. https://www.jr-art.net/projects/migrants-picnic-across-the-border
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewkowich, D. (2019). The thought chronicle: Developing a multimodal repertoire of response in teacher education. English in Education, 53(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2018.1534531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, B. (2021). Who holds the power? Students respond to whiteness in the canon. Art Education, 74(5), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.1928471
   Google Scholar
• Maloy, R., Trust, T., Kommers, S., Malinowski, A., & LaRoche, I. (2017). 3D modeling and printing in history/social studies classrooms: Initial lessons and insights. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(2), 229–249. https://citejournal.org/volume-17/issue-2-17/social-studies/3d-modeling-and-printing-in-historysocial-studies-classrooms-initial-lessons-and-insights
   Google Scholar
• Marlatt, R. (2018). Get in the game: Promoting justice through digitized literature study. Multicultural Perspectives, 20(4), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2018.1467769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias, S., Thompson, N., Sedas, R. M., Rosin, M., Soep, E., Peppler, K., Roche, J., Wong, J., Hurley, M., Bell, P., & Bevan, B. (2021). The trouble with STEAM and why we use it anyway. Science Education, 105(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menano, L., Fidalgo, P., Santos, I. M., & Thormann, J. (2019). Integration of 3D printing in art education: A multidisciplinary approach. Computers in the Schools, 36(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2019.1643442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Min, Y. S. (1996). The new museum of contemporary art. In S. Cahan & Z. Kocur (Eds.), Contemporary art and multicultural education (p. 141). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreck, B. (2004). The artistic and professional development of teachers: A study of teachers’ attitudes toward and use of the arts in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103260072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Kind, S., & Kocher, L. L. (2017). Encounters with materials in early childhood education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2018). Theorizing the nexus of STEAM practice. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1316331
   Google Scholar
• Price-Dennis, D., Holmes, K. A., & Smith, E. (2015). Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2015). Writing, literate activity, semiotic remediation: A sociocultural approach. In G. Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads: The process-product interface (pp. 185–201). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. A., & Hengst, J. A. (2010). Introduction: Exploring semiotic remediation. In P. A. Prior & J. A. Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 1–23). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rael, R., & San Fratello, V. (with Colectivo Chopeke). (2019). Teeter-totter wall [Art installation]. Design Museum. https://designmuseum.org/exhibitions/beazley-designs-of-the-year/transport/teeter-totter-wall
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (1994). Constructing social research. Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratto, M., & Hertz, G. (2019). Critical making and interdisciplinary learning: Making as a bridge between art, science, engineering, and social interventions. In L. Bogers & L. Chiappini (Eds.), The critical makers reader: (Un)learning technology (pp. 17–28). Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). The Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ruurs, M. (2016). Stepping stones: A refugee family’s journey (F. Raheem, Trans.; N. A. Badr, Illus.). Orca Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonover, N. R. (2020). Intersecting compositional and transactional theory: How art can help define reader response. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 54(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.1.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multi-modal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2012.656347
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, D. M. (2010). Fabricating consent: Three-dimensional objects as rhetorical compositions. Computers and Composition, 27(4), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Sipe, L. R. (1999). Children’s response to literature: Author, text, reader, context. Theory into Practice, 38(3), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If meaning is constructed, what is it made from? Toward a cultural theory of reading. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell‐Allen, C. (1998). Reading as mediated and mediating action: Composing meaning for literature through multimedia interpretive texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(2), 198–226. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.33.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. E. (2018). Composing for affect, audience, and identity: Toward a multidimensional understanding of adolescents’ multimodal composing goals and designs. Written Communication, 35(2), 182–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317752335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M. J. (2020). The application of digital fabrication technologies to the art and design curriculum in a teacher preparation program: A case study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09524-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. M. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2003.11651739
   Google Scholar
• Vaccarezza, M., & Papa, V. (2015). 3D printing: A valuable resource in human anatomy education. Anatomical Science International, 90(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-014-0257-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verner, I., & Merksamer, A. (2015). Digital design and 3D printing in technology teacher education. Procedia CIRP, 36, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.041
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and tinkering: A review of the literature. National Research Council Committee on Out-of-School STEM Learning. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_089888.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, S., & Kyser, C. (2021). Bringing form, content and aesthetics together: Preservice teachers reading contemporary picturebooks and designing multimodal responses. Literacy Research and Instruction, 60(3), 264–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1822472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar