Sex- and gender-sensitive public health research: an analysis of research proposals in a research institute in the Netherlands

References

• Ali, A., and C. E. Sichel. 2018. Humanizing the scientific method. In The crisis of connection. Roots, consequences and solutions, ed. A. Ali, C. Gilligan, and P. Noguera, 211–27. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bairey Merz, C. N. 2014. Sex, death, and the diagnosis gap. Circulation 130 (9):740–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, G. R. 2014. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Social Science & Medicine 110:10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beery, A. K., and I. Zucker. 2011. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35 (3):565–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branković, I., P. Verdonk, and I. Klinge. 2013. Applying a gender lens on human papillomavirus infection: Cervical cancer screening, HPV DNA testing, and HPV vaccination. International Journal for Equity in Health 12:14. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitendijk, S., and K. Maes (2015). Gendered research and innovation: Integrating sex and gender analysis into the research process. League of European Research Universities. Accessed March 08, 2017 http://www.leru.org/files/publications/LERU_AP18_Gendered_research_and_innovation_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIHR (2015). Integrating sex & gender checklist – partnership development grants for the healthy & productive work initiative. Ottowa: Canadian Institute for Health Research. Accessed February 28, 2017: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49336.html
   Google Scholar
• Consultants YWM. 2011. Toolkit Gender in EU-funded Research. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Curno, M. J., S. Rossi, I. Hodges-Mameletzis, R. Johnston, M. A. Price, and S. Heidari. 2016. A systematic review of the inclusion (or exclusion) of women in HIV research: From clinical studies of antiretrovirals and vaccines to cure strategies. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 71 (2):181–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (2015). Horizon 2020 monitoring report 2015 (B-1094). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (2016). Promoting gender equality in research and innovation – horizon 2020. Accessed March 08, 2017: https://ec.europa.eu/programs/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/promoting-gender-equality-research-and-innovation
   Google Scholar
• EMGO (2017). Extensive assessment of a research proposal (n.d.). Amsterdam: VU University Medical Centre, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research. Accessed March 14, 2017 www.emgo.nl/files/1860
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., and N. Thorogood. 2014. Part III: Managing and analysing data. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarström, A., and E. Annandale. 2012. A conceptual muddle: An empirical analysis of the use of ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ in ‘gender-specific medicine’ journals. PLoS One 7 (4):e34193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarström, A., K. Johansson, E. Annandale, C. Ahlgren, L. Aléx, M. Christianson, … P. E. Gustafsson. 2014. Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: The state of the art. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 68 (2):185–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankivsky, O. 2012. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: Implications of intersectionality. Social Science & Medicine 74 (11):1712–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G., Ed. 1987. Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari, S., T. F. Babor, P. De Castro, S. Tort, and M. Curno. 2016. Sex and gender equity in research: Rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1):2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Institute of Gender and Health, part of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2016). Online training modules: integrating sex & gender in health research. Accessed March 8, 2017http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49347.html
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Z. Sharman, B. Vissandjee, and D. E. Stewart. 2014. Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact? PLoS One 9 (6):e99900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. L., and A. Beaudet. 2012. Sex and gender reporting in health research: Why Canada should be a leader. Canadian Journal of Public Health 104 (1):80–81.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., T. Fitzgerald, A. Salganicoff, S. F. Wood, J. M. Goldstein, and Y. L. Colson (2015). Sex-specific medical research: why women’s health can’t wait. A Report of the Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women’s Health & Gender Biology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Retrieved from: http://www.brighamandwomens.org/Departments_and_Services/womenshealth/ConnorsCenter/Policy/ConnorsReportFINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, A. H., Y. T. van der Schouw, V. Regitz-Zagrosek, E. Swahn, Y. E. Appelman, G. Pasterkamp, … K. Eizema. 2011. Red alert for women’s heart: The urgent need for more research and knowledge on cardiovascular disease in women. European Heart Journal 32 (11):1362–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauvais-Jarvis, F., N. B. Merz, P. J. Barnes, R. D. Brinton, J. J. Carrero, D. L. DeMeo, … A. Lonardo. 2020. Sex and gender: Modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. The Lancet 396 (10250):565–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melloni, C., J. S. Berger, T. Y. Wang, F. Gunes, A. Stebbins, K. S. Pieper, … L. K. Newby. 2010. Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 3 (2):135–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergaert, L., and R. Minto. 2015. Ex Ante and Ex post evaluations: Two sides of the same coin?: The case of gender mainstreaming in EU research policy. European Journal Risk Regulation 6 (1):47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, G., and K. Lippel. 2014. From individual coping strategies to illness codification: The reflection of gender in social science research on Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS). International Journal for Equity in Health 13 (1):78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W., J. P. Andersen, L. Schiebinger, and J. W. Schneider. 2017. One and a half million medical papers reveal a link between author gender and attention to gender and sex analysis. Nature Human Behaviour 1 (11):791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertelt-Prigione, S., R. Parol, S. Krohn, R. Preißner, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek. 2010. Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines. BMC Medicine 8 (1):70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, S. K., and A. Hurria. 2010. Impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on cancer therapy and disease progression. Journal of Clinical Oncology 28 (26):4086–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. P., and K. Hamberg. 2016. Doubly blind: A systematic review of gender in randomised controlled trials. Global Health Action 9:29597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademaker, M. 2001. Do women have more adverse drug reactions? American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 2 (6):349–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raz, L., and V. M. Miller (2012). Handbook of experimental pharmacology. In Considerations of sex and gender differences in preclinical and clinical trials. Accessed May 2017 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-30726-3_7.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, T. 2002. Gender mainstreaming: Misappropriated and misunderstood. Stockholm: Department of Sociology, University of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Regitz‐Zagrosek, V. 2012. Sex and gender differences in health: Science & society series on sex and science. EMBO Reports 13 (7):596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L., I. Klinge, H. Y. Paik, I. Sánchez de Madariaga, M. Schraudner, and M. Stefanick. ed. 2011-2017. Gendered innovations in science, health & medicine, engineering, and environment. genderedinnovations.stanford.edu
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, T. 2012. Gender, health, research, and public policy. In Gender, sex & health research, ed. J. L. Oliffe and L. Greaves, 203–2015. Thousand oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, K., C. E. McCormack, and N. A. Bradbury. 2014. Do you know the sex of your cells? American Journal of Physiological Cell Physiology 306:C3–C18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariat, S. F., J. P. Sfakianos, M. J. Droller, P. I. Karakiewicz, S. Meryn, and B. H. Bochner. 2010. The effect of age and gender on bladder cancer: A critical review of the literature. BJU International 105 (3):300–08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, K. W., O. Hankivsky, and L. M. Bates. 2012. Gender and health: Relational, intersectional, and biosocial approaches. Social Science & Medicine 74:1661–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonk, P., M. Muntinga, and G. Croiset. 2016. Gender en diversiteit in het geneeskundeonderwijs. Tijdschrift Voor Genderstudies 19 (2):225–39.
   Google Scholar
• Verdonk, P., M. Ridder, A. Kent, and M. Muntinga Building sex and gender research capacity in public health. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• ZonMW. 2015. Gender and health knowledge agenda. Den Haag: ZonMW, Alliantie Gender en Gezondheid.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, I., and A. K. Beery. 2010. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature 465 (7299):690–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar