REFERENCES

• Armitage, D. R., F. Berkes, and N. Doubleday. 2007. Introduction: moving beyond co-management. Pages 1–18 in D. Armitage, F. Berkes, and N. Doubleday, editors. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. R., R. Plummer, F. Berkes, R. I. Arthur, A. T. Charles, I. J. Davidson-Hunt, A. P. Diduck, N. C. Doubleday, D. S. Johnson, M. Marschke, P. McConney, E. W. Pinkerton, and E. K. Wollenberg. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(2): 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baral, N. 2012. Empirical analysis of factors explaining local governing bodies' trust for administering agencies in community-based conservation. Journal of Environmental Management 103: 41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1692–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummel, R. F., K. C. Nelson, and P. J. Jakes. 2012. Burning through organizational boundaries? Examining inter-organizational communication networks in policy-mandated collaborative bushfire planning groups. Global Environmental Change 22: 516–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clewell, A. F., and J. Aronson. 2007. Ecological restoration: principles, values, and structure of an emerging profession, 2nd edition. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, F. G. 1989. Treaty Indian tribes and Washington State: the evolution of tribal Involvement In fisheries management in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Pages 37–48 in E. Pinkerton, editor. Cooperative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Doubleday, N. C. 1989. Co-management provisions of the Inuvialuit final agreement. Pages 209–230 in E. Pinkerton, editor. Co-operative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Fayram, A. H., D. A. Schenborn, J. M. Hennessy, N. A. Nate, and P. J. Schmalz. 2009. Exploring the conflict between broad scale and local inland fisheries management: the risks to agency credibility. Fisheries 34: 232–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilmet, G. M., and D. L. Whited. 2002. American Indian and non-Indian philosophies of technology and their differential impact on the environment of the southern Puget Sound. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 26: 33–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E., and D. D. White. 2008. Representing recovery: science and local control in the framing of U.S. Pacific Northwest salmon policy. Human Ecology Review 15: 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. E. 2006. Critical next steps in research on public meetings and environmental decision making. Human Ecology Review 13: 150–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen-Møller, J. 2009. Natursyns model: a conceptual framework and method for analysing and comparing views of nature. Landscape and Urban Planning 89 (3–4): 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, M. A. 2010. Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: the development of an indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work 1: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, T. W., and R. N. Reid. 2006. Testimonies from fisheries manager, scientists, and industry: achievements, lessons, and advice. Pages 11–30 in A. N. Read and T. W. Hartley, editors. Partnerships for a common purpose: cooperative fisheries research and management. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 52, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., E. Baker, R. Bednarz, D. Borgeson, J. Braunscheidel, J. Breck, M. Bremigan, A. Harrington, R. Hay, R. Lockwood, A. Nuhfer, J. Schneider, P. Seelbach, J. Waybrant, and T. Zorn. 2003. Developing a standardized sampling program: the Michigan experience. Fisheries 28(7): 18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henquinet, J. W., and T. Dobson. 2006. The public trust doctrine and sustainable ecosystems: a great lakes fisheries case study. New York University Environmental Law Journal 14: 323–373.
   Google Scholar
• Hermoso, V., and M. Clavero. 2013. Revisiting ecological integrity 30-years later: non-native species and the misdiagnosis of freshwater ecosystem health. Fish and Fisheries 14: 416–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, T. J., J. D. Pearson, and B. Chavis. 2003. Peoplehood: a model for the extension of sovereignty in American Indian studies. Wicazo Sa Review 18: 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgren, J. M. 2013. Bringing us back to the river. Pages 133–146 in N. Auer and D. Dempsey, editors. The Great Lake sturgeon. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgren, J. M. 2014. Fishery co-management opportunities between tribal and state agencies: conflict to collaboration. Doctoral dissertation. Michigan Technological University, Houghton.
   Google Scholar
• Houde, N. 2007. The six faces of traditional ecological knowledge: challenges and opportunities for Canadian co-management arrangements. Ecology and Society 12(2): 34–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2013. We must do better—we have to do better. Fisheries 38: 431–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. 2007. In the power of power: the understated aspect of fisheries and coastal management. Human Organization 66: 426–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., H. Minde, and R. Nilsen. 2003. Indigenous peoples: resource management and global rights. Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerer, R. N. 2000. Native knowledge for native ecosystems. Journal of Forestry 98(8): 4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, D. 2005. The Great Lakes charter fishing industry: 1973 to 2002. Fisheries 30(3): 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, R. T. 2005. Fisheries: history, science, and management. Pages 121–129 in J. H. Lehr and J. Keeley, editors. Water encyclopedia: surface and agricultural water. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lerma, M. 2012. Indigeneity and homeland: land, history, ceremony, and language. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 36(3): 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, W. P., and N. Kmiecik. 2006. A discussion of cooperative management arrangements within the Ojibwa ceded territories. Pages 163–168 in A. N. Read and T. W. Hartley, editors. Partnerships for a common purpose: cooperative fisheries research and management. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 52, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Naiman, R. J. 2013. Socio-ecological complexity and the restoration of river ecosystems. Inland Waters 3: 391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natcher, D. C., S. Davis, and C. G. Hickey. 2005. Co-management: managing relationships, not resources. Human Organization 64: 240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesper, L. 2012. Twenty-five years of Ojibwe treaty rights in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 36: 47–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. A. 1999. History of inland fisheries management in North America. Pages 3–31 in C. C. Kohler and W. A. Hubert, editors. Inland fisheries management in North America, 1st edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Notzke, C. 1995. A new perspective in Aboriginal natural resource management: co-management. Geoforum 26: 187–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlson, D., K. Cushing, L. Trulio, and A. Leventhal. 2008. Advancing indigenous self-determination through endangered species protection: Idaho gray wolf recovery. Environmental Science and Policy 11: 430–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. E., and D. R. Williams. 1998. Paradigms and problems: the practice of social science in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 11: 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, E. 1989. Co-operative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., and J. FitzGibbon. 2004. Some observations on the terminology in co-operative environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 70: 63–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reo, N. J., and K. Powys Whyte. 2012. Hunting and morality as elements of traditional ecological knowledge. Human Ecology 40: 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettig, B. R., F. Berkes, and E. Pinkerton. 1989. The future of fisheries co-management: a multi-disciplinary assessment. Pages 273–289 in E. Pinkerton, editor. Co-operative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., R. G. Snodgrass, and H. D. Delcore. 2011. Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, E. 2000. Kincentric ecology: indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecological Applications 10: 1327–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogen, K. 2003. Adapting adaptive management to a cultural understanding of land use conflicts. Society and Natural Resources 16: 435–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman, R. C. 2003. Is it really just a social construction?: the contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources 16: 671–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. 2008. The cultural values model: an Integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 84: 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. 1995. Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. D., E. A. Corley, and M. S. White. 2008. Water managers' perceptions of the science-policy interface in Phoenix, Arizona: implications for an emerging boundary organization. Society and Natural Resources 21: 230–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. 2001. A theory of everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. Shambhala, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing Company, Limited, Nova Scotia, Canada. AFS
   Google Scholar