REFERENCES

• Albert, C. H., and W. Thuiller. 2008. Favourability functions versus probability of presence: advantages and misuses. Ecography 31: 417–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, M. B., A. Rozenfeld, C. Rahbek, and P. A. Marquet. 2011. Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change. Ecography 34: 897–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmar, W., and B. D. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. M., W. C. Latta, and G. R. Smith. 2004. An atlas of Michigan fishes: with keys and illustrations for their identification. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Miscellaneous Publication 192, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Baselga, A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, G. T., and M. D. Stone. 1995. Fishes of Wyoming. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. J. D. 1971. Fishes of Montana. Montana State University, Bozeman.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. J., D. S. Schoeman, W. J. Sydeman, K. Brander, L. B. Buckley, M. Burrows, C. M. Duarte, P. J. Moore, J. M. Pandolfi, E. Poloczanska, W. Venables, and A. J. Richardson. 2011. Quantitative approaches in climate change ecology. Global Change Biology 17: 3697–3713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, B. M., and M. L. Warren. 1986. A distributional atlas of Kentucky fishes. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Scientific and Technical Series Number 4, Frankfort.
   Google Scholar
• Comte, L., and G. Grenouillet. 2013. Do stream fish track climate change? Assessing distribution shifts in recent decades. Ecography 36: 1236–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J., and J. A. Miller. 2009. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Frimpong, E. A., and P. L. Angermeier. 2009. FishTraits: a database of ecological and life-history traits of freshwater fishes of the United States. Fisheries 34: 487–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimpong, E. A., and P. L. Angermeier 2010. Trait-based approaches in the analysis of stream fish communities. Pages 109–136 in K. B. Gido and D. A. Jackson, editors. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 73, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren, and M. D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese, R., and D. Pauly, editors. 2014. FishBase. Available: www.fishbase.org. (June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo, B., and D. C. Aldridge. 2013. Evaluating the combined threat of climate change and biological invasions on endangered species. Biological Conservation 160: 225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli, N. J., and D. J. McCabe. 2002. Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond's assembly rules model. Ecology 83: 2091–2096.
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães, P. R., Jr., and P. Guimarães. 2006. Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. Environmental Modelling and Software 21: 1512–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberry, B. B., and H. S. He. 2013. Prevalence, statistical thresholds, and accuracy assessment for species distribution models. Web Ecology 13: 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hartel, K. E., D. B. Halliwell, and A. E. Launer. 2002. Inland fishes of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Audubon Society, Easthampton.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., and W. Fithian. 2013. Inferences from presence-only data; the ongoing controversy. Ecography 36: 864–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino, J. 2013. The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the freshwater realm. Biological Reviews 88: 166–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocutt, C. H., and E. O. Wiley, editors. 1986. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeinghaus, D. J., K. O. Winemiller, and J. S. Birnbaum. 2007. Local and regional determinants of stream fish assemblage structure: inferences based on taxonomic vs. functional groups. Journal of Biogeography 34: 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., and E. A. Frimpong. 2015. Using historical atlas data to develop high-resolution distribution models of freshwater fishes. PLoS One 10(6): e0129995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., and E. A. Frimpong 2016a. Modifying the United States national hydrography dataset to improve data quality for ecological models. Ecological Informatics 32: 7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., and E. A. Frimpong 2016b. Limited transferability of stream-fish distribution models among river catchments: reasons and implications. Freshwater Biology 61: 729–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., E. A. Frimpong, and D. J. Orth. 2016. Temporal transferability of stream fish distribution models: can uncalibrated SDMs predict distribution shifts over time? Diversity and Distributions 22: 651–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. A., P. R. Peres-Neto, and J. D. Olden. 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities—the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M. D. 2000. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecology 15: 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6): 21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labay, B., A. E. Cohen, B. Sissel, D. A. Hendrickson, F. D. Martin, and S. Sarkar. 2011. Assessing historical fish community composition using surveys, historical collection data, and species distribution models. PLoS One 6(9): e25145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre, P., and M. De Cáceres. 2013. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecology Letters 16: 951–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7: 601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Q. Guo, and C. Elkan. 2011. Can we model the probability of presence of species without absence data? Ecography 34: 1096–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcy, B. C., D. E. Fletcher, F. D. Martin, M. H. Paller, and M. J. M. Reichert. 2005. Fishes of the Middle Savannah River Basin: with emphasis on the Savannah River Site. University of Georgia Press, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, L., T. Bondelid, T. Dewald, J. Johnston, R. Moore, and A. Rea. 2012. NHDPlus Version 2: User Guide. Available: www.horizonsystems.com/NHDPlus/NHDPlusV2_home.php. (June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• McManamay, R. A., and E. A. Frimpong. 2015. Hydrologic filtering of fish life history strategies across the United States: implications for streamflow alteration. Ecological Applications 25: 243–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManamay, R. A., and R. M. Utz. 2014. Open-access databases as unprecedented resources and drivers of cultural change in fisheries science. Fisheries 39: 417–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menhinick, E. F. 1991. The freshwater fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Raleigh.
   Google Scholar
• Mettee, M. F., P. E. O'Neil, and J. M. Pierson. 1996. Fishes of Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Birmingham, Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Mims, M. C., J. D. Olden, Z. R. Shattuck, and N. L. Poff. 2010. Life-history trait diversity of native freshwater fishes in North America. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 19: 390–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muneepeerakul, R., E. Bertuzzo, H. J. Lynch, W. F. Fagan, A. Rinaldo, and I. Rodriguez-Iturbe. 2008. Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi-Missouri basin. Nature 453: 220–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orians, G. H., and J. F. Wittenberger. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. The American Naturalist 137:S29–S49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, L. M. 1983. Handbook of darters. Tfh Publications, Neptune, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Peoples, B. K., and E. A. Frimpong. 2016. Biotic interactions and habitat drive positive co-occurrence between facilitating and beneficiary stream fishes. Journal of Biogeography 43: 923–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, A. T. 2003. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. The Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 419–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, A. T., M. Papeş, and J. Soberón. 2008. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecological Modelling 213: 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflieger, W. L. 1997. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. J., R. P. Anderson, and R. E. Schapire. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190: 231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritt, J. J., and E. A. Frimpong. 2010. Quantitative determination of rarity and implications for imperiled-species designations. Conservation Biology 24: 1249–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available: www.R-project.org. (November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Robison, H. W., and T. M. Buchanan. 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, F. C., R. G. Arndt, J. W. Foltz, and J. M. Quattro. 2009. Freshwater fishes of South Carolina. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. T., and W. M. Brenneman. 2001. The inland fishes of Mississippi. University Press of Mississippi, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Seaber, P. R., F. P. Kapinos, and G. L. Knapp. 1987. Hydrologic Unit Maps. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2294, Denver, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. C., and R. L. Wallace. 1982. Fishes of Idaho. University Press of Idaho, Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L. 1985. The inland fishes of New York State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. W. 1979. The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois, Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Soberón, J., and M. Nakamura. 2009. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 19644–19650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer, J. R., Jr., J. M. Boltz, and L. R. White. 1995. The fishes of West Virginia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 146: 1–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sublette, J. E., M. D. Hatch, and M. F. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Thuiller, W., L. J. Pollock, M. Gueguen, and T. Münkemüller. 2015. From species distributions to meta-communities. Ecology Letters 18: 1321–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio: with illustrated keys, revised edition. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Surface waters data and metadata files. USEPA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Available: www.epa.gov/emap/remap/html/three/data/index.html. (August 2009).
   Google Scholar
• USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2000. The National Hydrography Dataset—concepts and contents. USGS, Reston, Virginia. Available: nhd.usgs.gov/chapter1/chp1_data_users_guide.pdf. (May 2012).
   Google Scholar
• USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) 2008. Ecology data. USGS, Reston, Virginia. Available: water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ecology. (August 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., D. Infante, P. Esselman, A. Cooper, D. Wu, W. Taylor, D. Beard, G. Whelan, and A. Ostroff. 2011. A hierarchical spatial framework and database for the national river fish habitat condition assessment. Fisheries 36: 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, G., T. Hastie, S. Barry, J. Elith, and J. R. Leathwick. 2009. Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. Biometrics 65: 554–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, N. E., T. C. Edwards, Jr., C. H. Graham, P. B. Pearman, and J.-C. Svenning. 2010. New trends in species distribution modelling. Ecography 33: 985–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar