1,471
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measurement in Instructional Communication Research: A Decade in Review

References

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979/2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
  • Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Communication Yearbook, 3, 543–559.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Beatty, M. J., McCroskey, J. C., & Heisel, A. D. (1998). Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65, 197–219. doi:10.1080/03637759809376448
  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43–55.
  • Bloom, B. S.(Ed.). (1954). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
  • Bloom, B. S.(Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 2: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
  • Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the classroom: The development and validation of the Student Intellectual Stimulation Scale. Communication Reports, 23, 91–105. doi:10.1080/08934215.2010.511399
  • Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Griffin, D. J. (2011). Teacher leadership and intellectual stimulation: Improving students’ approaches to studying through intrinsic motivation. Communication Research Reports, 28, 337–346. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.615958
  • Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1992). Meta-analysis of the relationship between communication apprehension and cognitive performance. Communication Education, 41, 68–76. doi:10.1080/03634529209378871
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Byrne, Z. S., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). The history of organizational justice: The founders speak. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cahn, D. D., & Shulman, G. M. (1984). The perceived understanding instrument. Communication Research Reports, 1, 122–125.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
  • Cayanus, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2004). An instructor self-disclosure scale. Communication Research Reports, 21, 252–263. doi:10.1080/08824090409359987
  • Cayanus, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2008). Teacher self-disclosure: Amount, relevance and negativity. ;Communication Quarterly, 56, 325–341. doi:10.1080/01463370802241492
  • Cayanus, J. L., Martin, M. M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2009). The relation between teacher self-disclosure and student motives to communicate. Communication Research Reports, 26, 105–113. doi:10.1080/08824090902861523
  • Chesebro, J. L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52, 135–147. doi:10.1080/03634520302471
  • Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The development of the Teacher Clarity Short Inventory (TCSI) to measure clear teaching in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15, 262–266. doi:10.1080/08824099809362122
  • Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students’ reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material: A validity test. Communication Education, 49, 297–301. doi:10.1080/03634520009379217
  • Chory, R. M. (2007). Enhancing student perceptions of fairness: The relationship between instructor credibility and classroom justice. Communication Education, 56, 89–105. doi:10.1080/03634520600994300
  • Chory, R. M., Horan, S. M., Carton, S. T., & Houser, M. L. (2014). Toward a further understanding of students’ emotional responses to classroom injustice. Communication Education, 63, 41–62. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.837496
  • Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53, 253–273. doi:10.1080/0363452042000265189
  • Civikly, J. M. (1992). Clarity: Teachers and students making sense of instruction. Communication Education, 41, 138–152. doi:10.1080/03634529209378876
  • Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Russell, D. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 369–378. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.66.2.369
  • Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Importance ratings of socially supportive behaviors by children and adolescents. School Psychology Review, 32(1), 108–131.
  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Docan-Morgan, T. (2011). “Everything changed’: Relational turning point events in college teacher–student relationships from teachers’ perspective. Communication Education, 60, 20–50. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.497223
  • Dwyer, K. K., Bingham, S. G., Carlson, R. E., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A. M., & Fus, D. A. (2004). Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21, 264–272. doi:10.1080/08824090409359988
  • Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264–291. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x
  • Emmert, P., & Barker, L. L. (1989). Measurement of communication behavior. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Fenz, W., & Epstein, S. (1967). Gradients of physiological arousal in parachutists as a function of an approaching jump. Psychosomatic Medicine, 29(1), 33–51. doi:10.1097/00006842-196701000-00005
  • Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2013). Teacher power mediates the effects of technology policies on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62, 26–47. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.725132
  • Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2014). Teacher verbal aggressiveness and credibility mediate the relationship between teacher technology policies and perceived student learning. Communication Education, 63, 210–234. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.919009
  • Finn, A. N., & Schrodt, P. (2012). Students perceived understanding mediates the effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on learner empowerment. Communication Education, 61, 111–130. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.656669
  • Frisby, B. N., Mansson, D. H., & Kaufmann, R. (2014). The cognitive learning measure: A three-study examination of validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 163–176. doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.903389
  • Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
  • Frymier, A. B. (1993). The relationship among communication apprehension, immediacy, and motivation to study. Communication Research Reports, 6, 8–17. doi:10.1080/08934219309367556
  • Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
  • Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher–student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207–219. doi:10.1080/03634520009379209
  • Frymier, A. B., Wanzer, M. B., & Wojtaszczyk, A. M. (2008). Assessing students’ perceptions of inappropriate and appropriate instructor humor. Communication Education, 57, 266–288. doi:10.1080/03634520701687183
  • Goodboy, A. K. (2011a). Instructional dissent in the college classroom. Communication Education, 60, 296–313. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.537756
  • Goodboy, A. K. (2011b). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–430. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
  • Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., Myers, S. A., & Zhao, X. (2011). Student use of relational and influence messages in response to perceived instructor power use in American and Chinese college classrooms. Communication Education, 60, 191–209. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.502970
  • Goodboy, A. K., Carton, S. T., Goldman, Z. W., Gozanski, T. A., Tyler, W. J. C., & Johnson, N. R. (2014). Discouraging instructional dissent and facilitating students’ learning experiences through instructor self-disclosure. Southern Communication Journal, 79, 114–129. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2013.865256
  • Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58, 372–396. doi:10.1080/03634520902755441
  • Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2007). Student communication satisfaction, similarity, and liking as a function of attributional confidence. Ohio Communication Journal, 45, 1–12.
  • Graham, E. E., West, R., & Schaller, K. A. (1992). The association between the relational teaching approach and teacher job satisfaction. Communication Reports, 5, 11–22. doi:10.1080/08934219209367539
  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247. doi:10.1037/1040–3590.7.3.238
  • Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 253–264. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00614.x
  • Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197–219.
  • Holmbeck, G. N., & Wandrei, M. L. (1993). Individual and relational predictors of adjustment in first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 73–78. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.40.1.73
  • Hooker, J., & Denker, K. (2013). The Learning Loss Scale as an assessment tool: An empirical examination of convergent validity with performative measures. Communication Teacher, 28, 130–143. doi:10.1080/17404622.2013.865765
  • Horan, S. M., & Afifi, T. D. (2014). Advancing instructional communication: Integrating a biosocial approach. Communication Education, 63, 383–404. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.934851
  • Horan, S. M., Chory, R. M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Understanding students’ classroom justice experiences and responses. Communication Education, 59, 453–474. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.487282
  • Horan, S. M., Houser, M. L., Goodboy, A. K., & Frymier, A. B. (2011). Students’ early impressions of instructors: Understanding the role of relational skills and messages. Communication Research Reports, 28, 74–85. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.541362
  • Horan, S. M., Martin, M. M., & Weber, K. (2012). Understanding emotional response theory: The role of instructor power and justice messages. Communication Quarterly, 60, 210–233. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.669323
  • Horan, S. M., & Myers, S. A. (2009). An explanation of college instructors’ use of classroom justice, power, and behavioral alteration techniques. Communication Education, 58, 483–496. doi:10.1080/03634520903055981
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
  • Hurt, H. T., Scott, M. D., & McCroskey, J. C. (1978). Communication in the classroom. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Johnson, D. I. (2009). Connected classroom climate: A validity study. Communication Research Reports, 26, 146–157. doi:10.1080/08824090902861622
  • Kearney, P., & Beatty, M. J. (1994). Measures of instructional communication. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 7–20). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Kelly, S. M. (2013). 30 ways Google Glass can innovate the classroom. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2013/08/19/google-glass-education/
  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Kerssen-Griep, J., Hess, J. A., & Trees, A. R. (2003). Sustaining the desire to learn: Dimensions of perceived instructional facework related to student involvement and motivation to learn. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 357–381. doi:10.1080/10570310309374779
  • Kerssen-Griep, J., Trees, A. R., & Hess, J. A. (2008). Attentive facework during instructional feedback: Key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment. Communication Education, 57, 312–332. doi:10.1080/03634520802027347
  • King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. W. (2009). The Instructional Feedback Orientation Scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 235–261. doi:10.1080/03634520802515705
  • King, P., & Witt, P. (2009). Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning. Communication Education, 58, 110–123. doi:10.1080/03634520802511233
  • Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
  • Ledbetter, A. M., & Finn, A. N. (2013). Teacher technology policies and online communication apprehension as predictors of learner empowerment. Communication Education, 62, 301–317. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.794386
  • Levine, T. R., Bresnahan, M. J., Park, H. S., Lapinski, M. K., Wittenbaum, G. M., & Shearman, S. M. (2003). Self-construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research, 29, 210–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2958.2003.tb00837.x
  • Li, L., Mazer, J. P., & Ju, R. (2011). Resolving international teaching assistant language inadequacy through dialogue: Challenges and opportunities for clarity and credibility. Communication Education, 60, 461–478. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.565352
  • Malachowski, C. C., Martin, M. M., & Vallade, J. I. (2013). An examination of students’ adaptation, aggression, and apprehension traits with their instructional feedback orientations. Communication Education, 62, 127–147. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.748208
  • Mansson, D. H. (2014). Students’ expressed academic concern, learning outcomes, and communication motives. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 247–286. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.904521
  • Marci, C. D., & Orr, S. (2006). The effect of emotional distance on psychophysiologic concordance and perceived empathy between patient and interviewer. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 31, 115–128. doi:10.1007/s10484–006–9008-4
  • Marci, C. D., Ham, J., Moran, E., & Orr, S. P. (2007). Physiologic correlates of perceived therapist empathy and social-emotional process during psychotherapy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 103–111. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000253731.71025.fc
  • Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99–125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
  • Mazer, J. P. (2013a). Associations among teacher communication behaviors, student interest, and engagement: A validity test. Communication Education, 62, 86–96. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.731513
  • Mazer, J. P. (2013b). Student emotional and cognitive interest as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student engagement: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Communication Education, 62, 253–277. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.777752
  • Mazer, J. P. (2013c). Validity of the student interest and engagement scales: Associations with student learning outcomes. Communication Studies, 64, 125–140. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.727943
  • Mazer, J. P., McKenna-Buchanan, T. P., Quinlan, M. M., & Titsworth, S. (2014). The dark side of emotion in the classroom: Emotional processes as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student negative emotions. Communication Education, 63, 149–168. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.904047
  • Mazer, J. P., & Thompson, B. (2011a). Student academic support: A validity test. Communication Research Reports, 28, 214–224. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.586074
  • Mazer, J. P., & Thompson, B. (2011b). The validity of the Student Academic Support Scale: Associations with social support and relational closeness. Communication Reports, 24, 74–85. doi:10.1080/08934215.2011.622237
  • McCroskey, J. C. (1997, November). Why we communicate the ways we do: A communibiological perspective. The Carroll C. Arnold Distinguished Lecture presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association convention, Chicago, IL.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1986). The affinity-seeking of classroom teachers. Communication Research Reports, 3, 158–167.
  • McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough, R. A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200–211. doi:10.1080/03634529609379049
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
  • McCroskey, L. L., Teven, J. J., Minielli, M. C., & Richmond McCroskey, V. P. (2014). James C. McCroskey's instructional communication legacy: Collaborations, mentorships, teachers, and students. Communication Education, 63, 283–307. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.911929
  • Miller, K., Considine, J., & Garner, J. (2007). Let me tell you about my job. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 231–260. doi:10.1177/0893318906293589
  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.85.3.424
  • Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). Foundations of instructional communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication (pp. 3–32). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Mottet, T. P., Frymier, A. B., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). Theorizing about instructional communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication (pp. 255–282). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Murray, D. S. (2014). Navigating toward andragogy: Coordination and management of student-professor conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 310–336. doi:10.1080/10570314.2013.866687
  • Myers, S. A. (2010). Instructional communication: The emergence of a field. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 149–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Myers, S. A., & Claus, C. J. (2012). The relationship between students’ motives to communicate with their instructors and classroom environment. Communication Quarterly, 60, 386–402. doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.688672
  • Myers, S. A., Zhong, M., & Guan, S. (1998). Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom. Communication Studies, 49, 240–254. doi:10.1080/10510979809368534
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • O'Mara, J., Allen, J. L., Long, K. M., & Judd, B. (1996). Communication apprehension, nonverbal immediacy, and negative expectations for learning. Communication Research Reports, 13, 109–128. doi:10.1080/08824099609362077
  • Paulsel, M. L., & Chory-Assad, R. M. (2005). Perceptions of instructor interactional justice as a predictor of student resistance. Communication Research Reports, 22, 283–291. doi:10.1080/000368105000317565
  • Paulsel, M. L., Chory-Assad, R. M., & Dunleavy, K. N. (2005). Student perceptions of instructor power as a predictor of classroom justice. Communication Research Reports, 22, 207–215. doi:10.1080/00036810500207030
  • Podlesny, J. A., & Raskin, D. C. (1977). Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782–799. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.782
  • Pytlak, M. A., & Houser, M. L. (2014). Because I'm the teacher and I said so: GTA use of behavioral alteration techniques to establish power and credibility in the college classroom. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 287–309. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.893010
  • Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. E. (2003). Development of the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 502–515. doi:10.1080/01463370309370170
  • Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1–12. doi:10.1080/03634528709378636
  • Roach, K. D. (1995). Teaching assistant argumentativeness: Effects on affective learning and student perceptions of power use. Communication Education, 44, 15–29. doi:10.1080/03634529509378994
  • Rodríguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293–305. doi:10.1080/03634529609379059
  • Rubin, R. B. (2009). Measurement in instructional communication. In R. B. Rubin, A. M. Rubin, E. E. Graham, E. M. Perse, & D. R. Seibold (Eds.), Communication research measures II: A sourcebook (pp. 43–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Rudick, C. K., & Golsan, K. B. (2014). Revisiting the relational communication perspective: Drawing upon relational dialectics theory to map an expanded research agenda for communication and instruction scholarship. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 255–273. doi:10.1080/10570314.2014.905796
  • Schrodt, P., & Finn, A. N. (2011). Students’ perceived understanding: An alternative measure and its associations with perceived teacher confirmation, verbal aggressiveness, and credibility. Communication Education, 60, 231–254. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.535007
  • Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Turman, P. D. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308–332. doi:10.1080/03634520701256062
  • Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Myers, S. A., Turman, P., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2008). Learner empowerment and teacher evaluations as functions of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 57, 180–200. doi:10.1080/03634520701840303
  • Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Turman, P., Myers, S. A., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2009). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructors’ prosocial communication behaviors and students’ learning outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 350–371. doi:10.1080/03634520902926851
  • Scott, M. D., & Wheeless, L. R. (1977). Instructional communication theory and research: An overview. Communication Yearbook, 1, 495–511.
  • Sidelinger, R. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Communication correlates of teacher clarity in the college classroom. Communication Research Reports, 14, 1–10. doi:10.1080/08824099709388640
  • Simonds, C. J. (1997). Classroom understanding: An expanded notion of teacher clarity. Communication Research Reports, 14, 279–290. doi:10.1080/08824099709388671
  • Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 169–191. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2010.51428542
  • Sociometric Solutions. (2014). Sociometric solutions: Organizations for humans. Retrieved from http://www.sociometricsolutions.com
  • Staton-Spicer, A. Q., & Wulff, D. H. (1984). Research in communication and instruction: Categorization and synthesis. Communication Education, 33, 377–391. doi:10.1080/03634528409384767
  • Thompson, B. (2008a). How college freshmen communicate student academic support: A grounded theory study. Communication Education, 57, 123–144. doi:10.1080/03634520701576147
  • Thompson, B. (2008b). Characteristics of parent teacher e-mail communication. Communication Education, 57, 201–223. doi:10.1080/03634520701852050
  • Thompson, B., & Mazer, J. P. (2009). College student ratings of student academic support: Frequency, importance, and modes of communication. Communication Education, 58, 433–458. doi:10.1080/03634520902930440
  • Thompson, B., & Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development of the parental academic support scale: Frequency, importance, and modes of communication. Communication Education, 61, 131–160. doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.657207
  • Titsworth, B. S. (2001a). The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational cues, and students’ notetaking on cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 283–297. doi:10.1080/03634520109379256
  • Titsworth, B. S. (2001b). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students’ affective learning. Communication Studies, 52, 169–179. doi:10.1080/10510970109388552
  • Titsworth, S., & Mazer, J. P. (2010). Clarity in teaching and learning: Conundrums, consequences, and opportunities. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 241–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Titsworth, S., McKenna, T., Mazer, J. P., & Quinlan, M. M. (2013). The bright side of emotion in the classroom: How teachers influence students’ enjoyment, hope, and pride. Communication Education, 62, 191–209. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.763997
  • Titsworth, B. S., Novak, D., Hunt, S., & Meyer, K. (2004, May). The effects of teacher clarity on affective and cognitive learning: A causal model of clear teaching behaviors. International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA, 52, 169–179. doi:10.1080/10510970109388552
  • Titsworth, B. S., Quinlan, M. M., & Mazer, J. P. (2010). Emotion in teaching and learning: Development and validation of the Classroom Emotions Scale. Communication Education, 59, 431–452. doi:10.1080/03634521003746156
  • Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37–54. doi:10.3102/00346543064001037
  • Trees, A. R., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009). Earning influence by communicating respect: Facework's contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 397–416. doi:10.1080/03634520802613419
  • The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). Developed jointly by the American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education, Washington, DC.
  • Waldeck, J. H. (2007). Answering the question: Student perceptions of personalized education and the construct's relationship to learning outcomes. Communication Education, 56, 409–432. doi:10.1080/03634520701400090
  • Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). The state of the art in instructional communication research. In W. R. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 207–230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Waldeck, J. H., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (2010). Philosophical and methodological foundations of instructional communication. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 161–180). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1–18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238
  • Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., Wojtaszczyk, A. M., & Smith, T. (2006). Appropriate and inappropriate uses of humor by teachers. Communication Education, 55(2), 178–196. doi:10.1080/03634520600566132
  • Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. (2005). Student interest: A two-study re-examination of the concept. Communication Quarterly, 53, 71–86. doi:10.1080/01463370500055996
  • Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2011). The development and testing of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 60, 51–74. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
  • Woolfolk, A. E., & McCune-Nicolich, L. (1984). Educational psychology for teachers (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Zhang, Q. (2011). Teacher immediacy, credibility, and clarity as predictors of student affective learning: A Chinese investigation. China Media Research, 7, 95–103.
  • Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). Constructing and validating a teacher immediacy scale: A Chinese perspective. Communication Education, 55, 218–241. doi:10.1080/03634520600566231
  • Zhang, Q., Oetzel, J. G., Gao, X., Wilcox, R. G., & Takai, J. (2007). Teacher immediacy scales: Testing for validity across cultures. Communication Education, 56, 228–248. doi:10.1080/03634520601089092

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.