Instructor strategic ambiguity: delineation of the construct and development of a measure

References

• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the classroom: The development and validation of the student intellectual stimulation scale. Communication Reports, 23, 91–105. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2010.511399
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Griffin, D. J. (2011). Transformational leadership and intellectual stimulation: Improving students’ approaches to studying through intrinsic motivation. Communication Research Reports, 28(4), 337–346. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.615958
   Google Scholar
• Brunson, D. A., & Vogt, J. F. (1996). Empowering our students and ourselves: A liberal democratic approach to the communication classroom. Communication Education, 45, 73–83. doi: 10.1080/03634529609379033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). The development of the teacher clarity short inventory (TCSI) to measure clear teaching in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 15, 262–266. doi: 10.1080/08824099809362122
   Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. doi: 10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. K. (2001). The politics of barking and the state of our schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 786–789. doi: 10.1177/003172170108201016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1928). The quest for certainty. New York, NY: Minton Beach.
   Google Scholar
• D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion and its dynamics during device comprehension with breakdown scenarios. Acta Psychologica, 151, 106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2004). The revised approaches to studying inventory (RASI) and its use in management education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 56–72. doi: 10.1177/1469787404040461
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242. doi: 10.1080/03637758409390197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faylor, N. R., Beebe, S. A., Houser, M. L., & Mottet, T. P. (2008). Perceived differences in instructional communication behaviors between effective and ineffective corporate trainers. Human Communication, 11, 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B. (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197–212. doi: 10.1080/01463370500089896
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/10510979909388466
   Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi: 10.1080/03634529609379048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabella, M. S. (1995). Unlearning certainty: Toward a culture of student inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 34, 236–242. doi: 10.1080/00405849509543686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R.L. Wilson (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory. (pp. 8–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451 (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 32, 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Kolowich, S. (2014, August). Confuse students to help them learn. The Chronicle of Higher Education: Teaching. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Confuse-Students-to-Help-Them/148385/.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learners as information processers: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31, 151–161. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Graham, E. E. (2015). Measurement in in communication research: A decade in review. Communication Education, 64, 208–240. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.1002509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millette, D. M., & Gorham, J. (2002). Teacher behavior and student motivation. In J. L. Chesebro & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for teachers (pp. 141–153). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Neuliep, J. W., & Grohskopf, E. L. (2000). Uncertainty reduction and communication satisfaction during initial interaction: An initial test and replication of a new axiom. Communication Reports, 13(2), 67–77. doi: 10.1080/08934210009367726
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., Wang, J. S., Trolian, T. L., & Blaich, C. (2013). How the instructional and learning environments of liberal arts colleges enhance cognitive development. Higher Education, 66, 569–583. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9622-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (2006). Communication research statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rippin, A., Booth, C., Bowie, S., & Jordan, J. (2002). A complex case: Using the case study method to explore uncertainty and ambiguity in undergraduate business education. Teaching In Higher Education, 7(4), 429–441. doi: 10.1080/135625102760553928
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., & Mazer, J.P. (2010). Clarity in teaching and learning: Conundrums, consequences, and opportunities. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 241–261). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 385–418. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, L., & Ivey, M. (2009). Sustaining ambiguity and fostering openness in the (design) learning environment. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 7, 155–167. doi: 10.1386/adch.7.3.155_1
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. (2005). Student interest: A two-study reexamination of the concept. Communication Quarterly, 53, 71–86. doi: 10.1080/01463370500055996
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 224–235. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar