A survey of instructional communication: 15 years of research in review

References

• Anderson, J. A. (1996). Communication theory: Epistemological foundations. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. A., Danowski, J. A., Feeley, T. H., & Stalker, J. (2010). Measuring quality in communication doctoral education using network analysis of faculty-hiring patterns. Journal of Communication, 60, 388–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Griffin, D. J., Holmgren, J. L., & Hickson, M., III. (2012). Prolific scholarship in communication studies: Five years in review. Communication Education, 61, 380–394. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.699080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. L. (2002). From the speech teacher to communication education: Some reflections. Communication Education, 51, 364–371. doi: 10.1080/03634520216528
   Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 59–68. doi: 10.1080/03634520109379232
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 17 (pp. 363–379). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eadie, W. F. (2009). Communication as a field and as a discipline. In W. F. Eadie (Ed.), 21st century communication: A reference handbook (pp. 12–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eadie, W. F. (2011). Stories we tell: Fragmentation and convergence in communication disciplinary history. The Review of Communication, 11, 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2014). Taking stock of research practices: A call for self-reflection. Communication Monographs, 81, 1–3. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.892670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. L. (2000). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, K. G., & Wilson, C. (2014). Virtual invisibility: Race and communication education. Communication Education, 63, 405–428. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.934852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A. (2015). Editor’s introduction: What exactly are we studying? Communication Education, 64, 491–493. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1067401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III, Bodon, J., & Turner, J. (2004). Research productivity in communication: An analysis, 1915–2001. Communication Quarterly, 52, 323–333. doi: 10.1080/01463370409370203
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III, Self, W. R., Johnston, J. R., Peacock, C., & Bodon, J. (2009). Prolific research in communication studies: Retrospective and prospective views. Communication Research Reports, 26, 337–346. doi: 10.1080/08824090903293726 doi: 10.1080/08824090903293726
   Google Scholar
• Hooker, J., & Denker, K. (2014). The learning loss scale as an assessment tool: An empirical examination of convergent validity with performative measures. Communication Teacher, 28, 130–143. doi: 10.1080/17404622.2013.865765
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Afifi, T. D. (2014). Advancing instructional communication: Integrating a biosocial approach. Communication Education, 63, 383–404. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.934851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S., Wright, A., & Simonds, C. (2014). Securing the future of communication education: Advancing an advocacy and research agenda for the 21st century. Communication Education, 63, 449–461. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.926016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl, M. L., & Lederman, L. C. (2009). Reflections on the eastern communication association centennial convention: The association at 100. Communication Quarterly, 57, 376–378. doi: 10.1080/01463370903320948
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Graham, E. E. (2015). Measurement in instructional communication research: A decade in review. Communication Education, 64, 208–240. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.1002509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., McKenna-Buchanan, T. P., Quinlan, M. M., & Titsworth, S. (2014). The dark side of emotion in the classroom: Emotional processes as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student negative emotions. Communication Education, 63, 149–168. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.904047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morreale, S., Backlund, P., & Sparks, L. (2014). Communication education and instructional communication: Genesis and evolution as fields of inquiry. Communication Education, 63, 344–354. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.944926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2008). Instructional communication: The emergence of a field. In D. L. Fassett & J. T.Warren (Eds.), The sage handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 149–159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (2010). Instructional communication: The emergence of a field. In D. L. Fassett & T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 149–159). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nerone, J. (2006). The future of communication history. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23, 254–262. doi: 10.1080/07393180600801856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, P. J., & Allen, R. R. (Eds.). (1974). New horizons for teacher education in speech communication. Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company.
   Google Scholar
• Preiss, R. W., & Wheeless, L. R. (2014). Perspectives on instructional communication’s historical path to the future. Communication Education, 63, 308–328. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.910605S doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.910605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V.P., & Frymier, A. B. (2010). Communication education and instructional development. In J. W. Chesebro (Ed.), A century of transformation: Studies of the 100th anniversary of the eastern communication association (pp. 310–328). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. M. (2002). Communication education and communication education: On editing and teaching. Communication Education, 51, 360–363. doi: 10.1080/03634520216530
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B. (2009). Measurement in instructional communication. In R. B. Rubin, A. M. Rubin, E. Graham, E. M. Perse, & D. R. Seibold (Eds.), Communication research measures II: A sourcebook (pp. 43–56). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 169–191. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2010.51428542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smythe, M. J., & Hess, J. A. (2005). Are student self-reports a valid method for measuring teacher nonverbal immediacy? Communication Education, 54, 170–179. doi: 10.1080/03634520500213389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (1992). Expanding the research agenda for instructional communication: Raising some unasked questions. Communication Education, 41, 2–22. doi: 10.1080/03634529209378867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (1993). Retrieving the research agenda for communication education: Asking the pedagogical questions that are “embarrassments to theory”. Communication Education, 42, 106–122. doi: 10.1080/03634529309378919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (2002). Communication education: The spiral continues. Communication Education, 51, 337–354. doi: 10.1080/03634520216532
   Google Scholar
• Staton-Spicer, A.Q., & Wulff, D. H. (1984). Research in communication and instruction: Categorization and synthesis. Communication Education, 33, 377–391. doi: 10.1080/03634528409384767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, T. D. (2008). Measuring the reputation and productivity of communication programs. Communication Education, 57, 297–311. doi: 10.1080/03634520801905600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thweatt, K. S., & Wrench, J. S. (2015). Affective learning: Evolving from values and planned behaviors to internalization and pervasive behavioral change. Communication Education, 64, 497–499. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058964 doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, C. E. (2009). Forum introduction: Has communication research made a difference? Communication Monographs, 76, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03637750802684006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley, H. E. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2000). Interrater reliability and agreement. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 95–124). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 24 (pp. 207–229). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (2010). Philosophical and methodological foundations of instructional communication. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 161–179). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L. (2012). The future of communication education. Communication Education, 61, 1–3. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.645391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207. doi: 10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar