Scholarly productivity in communication studies: five-year review 2012–2016

References

• Bellas, M. L., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. The Review of Higher Education, 22, 367–390. doi: 10.1353/rhe.1999.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013). Individual differences in faculty research time allocations across 13 countries. Research in Higher Education, 54, 329–348. doi: 10.1007/s11162-012-9273-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80, 225–237. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200503000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., & Ruffin, M. T. (1992). Characteristics of a productive research environment: Literature review. Academic Medicine, 67, 385–397. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199206000-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., & Schmitz, C. C. (1986). Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. Journal of Medical Education, 61, 22–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland, C. J., Seaquist, E., Pacala, J. T., Center, B., & Finstad, D. (2002). One school’s strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Academic Medicine, 77, 368–376. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Griffin, D. J., Holmgren, J. L., & Hickson, M. III. (2012). Prolific scholarship in communication studies: Five years in review. Communication Education, 61, 380–394. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.699080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 179–189. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.81.4.179-189
   Google Scholar
• Dey, E. L., Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism? Sociology of Education, 70, 308–323. doi: 10.2307/2673269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Academic values and faculty rewards. The Review of Higher Education, 17, 43–68. doi: 10.1353/rhe.1993.0002
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H., Moon, S, & Chen, Y. (2012). Does publishing in high-impact journals in communication matter? Electronic Journal of Communication, 22. http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/022/1/022125.html
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. J., Bolkan, S., Holmgren, J. L., & Tutzauer, F. (2016). Central journals and authors in communication using a publication network. Scientometrics, 106, 91–104. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1774-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardre, P., & Cox, M. (2009). Evaluating faculty work: Expectations and standards of faculty performance in research universities. Research Papers in Education, 24, 383–419. doi: 10.1080/02671520802348590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardre, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5, 35–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hardre, P. L., & Kollmann, S. L. (2012). Motivational implications of faculty performance standards. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40, 724–751. doi: 10.1177/1741143212456913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings, B. C., Rushbrook, P., & Smith, E. (2007). Academics’ views on publishing refereed works: A content analysis. Higher Education, 54, 307–332. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-8608-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Bodon, J., & Turner, J. (2004). Research productivity in communication: An analysis, 1915–2001. Communication Quarterly, 52, 323–333. doi:0.1080/01463370409370203 doi: 10.1080/01463370409370203
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Self, W. R., Johnston, J. R., Peacock, C., & Bodon, J. (2009). Prolific research in communication studies: Retrospective and prospective views. Communication Research Reports, 26, 337–346. doi:0.1080/08824090903293726 doi: 10.1080/08824090903293726
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1989). An analysis of prolific scholarship in speech communication, 1915-1985: Toward a yardstick for measuring productivity. Communication Education, 38, 230–236. doi: 10.1080/03634528909378759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1992). Administrator-scholars in speech communication: An analysis of research productivity, II. ACA Bulletin, 79, 66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1993). Active prolific scholars in communication studies: Analysis of research productivity, II. Communication Education, 42, 224–233. doi: 10.1080/03634529309378930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Stacks, D. W., & Bodon, J. (1999). The status of research productivity in communication: 1915-1995. Communication Monographs, 66, 178–197. doi: 10.1080/03637759909376471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, M., III., Turner, J., & Bodon, J. (2003). Research productivity in communication: An analysis, 1996-2001. Communication Research Reports, 20, 308–319. doi: 10.1080/08824090309388830
   Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71, 379–397. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlon, R. J., & Ortiz, S. (1997). Index to journals in communication studies through 1995. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 454–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, D., Melkers, J., & Youtie, J. (2014). Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, T. D., & Geel, R. (2007). Normative publication productivity of communication scholars at selected career milestones. Human Communication Research, 33, 103–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (1996). Scholarly publishing: Trash or treasure? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 27, 40–46. doi: 10.1080/00048623.1996.10754954
   Google Scholar
• Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201–222. doi: 10.1023/A:1003901018634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, K., & Becerra, V. M. (2014). A method to assess individual research outputs. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 21, 1–7. doi: 10.1504/IJMIC.2014.059387
   Google Scholar
• Webber, K. (2011). Measuring faculty productivity. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 105–121). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar