535
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Navigating instructional dialectics: empirical exploration of paradox in teaching

, , &
Pages 7-30 | Received 20 Jun 2017, Accepted 29 Sep 2017, Published online: 19 Oct 2017

References

  • Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: Dialogical perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1997). Rethinking communication in personal relationships from a dialectical perspective. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 325–349). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1998). A guide to dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships. In L. A. Baxter & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Baxter, L. A., & West, L. (2003). Couple perceptions of their similarities and differences: Dialectical perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(4), 491–514. doi: 10.1177/02654075030204004
  • Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Braithwaite, D. O., & Baxter, L. A. (2006). You’re my parent but you’re not: Dialectical tensions in stepchildren’s perceptions about communicating with the nonresidential parent. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(1), 30–48. doi:10.1080/ 00909880500420200 doi: 10.1080/00909880500420200
  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124–130. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
  • Dannels, D. P. (2015). Teacher communication concerns revisited: Calling into question the gnawing pull towards equilibrium. Communication Education, 64(1), 83–106. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.978796
  • Day, C. (2002). The challenge to be the best: Reckless curiosity and mischievous motivation. Teachers and Teaching, Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 421–434. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000549
  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Fassett, D. L., & Warren, J. T. (2007). Critical communication pedagogy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Finn, A. N. (2012). Teacher use of prosocial and antisocial power bases and students’ perceived instructor understanding and misunderstanding in the college classroom. Communication Education, 61, 67–79. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2011.636450
  • Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom (40th anniversary ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Frisby, B. N., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The relationships among perceived instructor rapport, student participation, and student learning outcomes. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33, 27–34.
  • Harrigan, M. (2009). The contradictions of identity-work for parents of visibly adopted children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(5), 634–658. doi:10.1177/0265407 doi: 10.1177/0265407509353393
  • Hoppe-Nagao, A., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2002). Relational dialectics and management strategies in marital couples. Southern Communication Journal, 67(2), 142–159. doi: 10.1080/10417940209373226
  • Jaschik, S. (2015, January 20). Well-prepared in their own eyes. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/20/study-finds-big-gaps-between-student-and-employer-perceptions
  • Johnson, R. N., & Deem, R. (2003). Talking of students: Tensions and contradictions for the manager-academic and the university in contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 46, 289–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1025377826704
  • Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 39–81. doi: 10.3102/00028312034001039
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lindquist, J. (2004). Class affects, classroom affectations: Working through the paradoxes of strategic empathy. College English, 67(2), 191–209. doi: 10.2307/4140717
  • Lowery-Hart, R., & Pacheco, G. (2011). Understanding the first-generation student experience in higher education through a relational dialectics perspective. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 127, 55–68. doi:10.1002/tl.45 doi: 10.1002/tl.457
  • McMillan, J. J., & Cheney, G. (1996). The student as consumer: The implications and limitations of a metaphor. Communication Education, 45, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/03634529609379028
  • Michalec, P. (2002). A calling to teach faith and the spiritual dimensions of teaching. Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 15(4), 5–14.
  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Boss.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Prentice, C. M., & Kramer, M. W. (2006). Dialectical tensions in the classroom: Managing tensions through communication. Southern Communication Journal, 71, 339–361. doi: 10.1080/10417940601000436
  • Robertson, D. R. (2005). Generative paradox in learner-centered college teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 181–194. doi: 10.1007/s10755-005-1935-0
  • Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59, 185–213. doi:10.1080/2F03634520903505936 doi: 10.1080/03634520903505936
  • Rudick, C. K., & Golsan, K. B. (2014). Revisiting the relational communication perspective: Drawing upon relational dialectics theory to map an expanded research agenda for communication and instruction scholarship. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 255–273. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2014.905796
  • Simmons, J., Lowery-Hart, R., Wahl, S. T., & McBride, M. C. (2013). Understanding the African-American student experience in higher education through a relational dialectics perspective. Communication Education, 62(4), 376–394. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2013.813631
  • Sprague, J. (1993a). Retrieving the research agenda for communication education: Asking the pedagogical questions that are “embarrassments to theory”. Communication Education, 42(2), 106–122. doi: 10.1080/03634529309378919
  • Sprague, J. (1993b). Why teaching works: The transformative power of pedagogical communication. Communication Education, 42(4), 349–366. doi: 10.1080/03634529309378951
  • Sprague, J. (1994) Ontology, politics, and instructional communication research: Why we can’t just “agree to disagree” about power. Communication Education, 43(2), 273–290. doi: 10.1080/03634529409378986
  • Sprague, J. (1999). The goals of communication education. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W. Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Taylor, F. W. (1914). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper.
  • Toller, P. W., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2009). Grieving together and apart: Bereaved parents’ contradictions of marital interaction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), 257–277. doi: 10.1080/00909880903025887
  • Wang, T. R. (2012). Understanding the memorable messages first-generation college students receive from on-campus mentors. Communication Education, 61, 335–357. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.691978

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.