Humor in the classroom: the effects of integrated humor on student learning

References

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. ( Abr. ed., pp. 63–91). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S.-J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60, 115–144. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.496867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. A. (1976). Anatomy of the joke. Journal of Communication, 26, 113–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331–345. doi: 10.1177/0146167290162013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bless, H., Mackie, D. M., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585–595. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2017). Development and validation of the clarity indicators scale. Communication Education, 66, 19–36. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1202994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Exploratory theoretical tests of the instructor humor- student learning link. Communication Education, 64, 45–64. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.978793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66, 129–147. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, S., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (1991). Individual differences in the communication of humorous messages. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 205–218. doi: 10.1080/10417949109372831
   Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, M., & Wanzer, M. B. (2016). Humor enactment in learning environments. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Communication and learning (Vol. 16, pp. 211–239). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Braver, S. L., Thoemmes, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342. doi: 10.1177/1745691614529796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A. R., & Elliott, S. M. (1981). Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks. Human Communication Research, 8, 43–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 191–203. doi: 10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., Wanzer, M. B., & Wojtaszczyk, A. M. (2008). Assessing students’ perceptions of inappropriate and appropriate teacher humor. Communication Education, 57, 266–288. doi: 10.1080/03634520701687183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R. L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha!. College Teaching, 54, 177–180. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2004). Analogical encoding: Facilitating knowledge transfer and integration. Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., Booth-Butterfield, M., Bolkan, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2015). The role of instructor humor and students’ educational orientations in student learning, extra effort, participation, and out-of-class communication. Communication Quarterly, 63, 44–61. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2014.965840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers’ use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39, 46–62. doi: 10.1080/03634529009378786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1992). Students’ perceptions of teacher behaviors as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly, 40, 239–252. doi: 10.1080/01463379209369839
   Google Scholar
• Gruner, C. R. (1967). Effect of humor on speaker ethos and audience information gain. Journal of Communication, 17, 228–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1967.tb01181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 233–240. doi: 10.1037/a0012758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackathorn, J., Garczynski, A. M., Blankmeyer, K., Tennial, R. D., & Solomon, E. D. (2011). All kidding aside: Humor increases learning at knowledge and comprehension levels. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11, 116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Hauck, W. E., & Thomas, J. W. (1972). The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 40, 52–55. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1972.11011352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, B. A. (1995). The new news and the 1992 presidential campaign: Perceived vs. Actual political knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 786–798. doi: 10.1177/107769909507200403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser, M. L., Cowan, R. L., & West, D. A. (2007). Investigating a new education frontier: Instructor communication behavior in CD-ROM texts – do traditionally positive behaviors translate into this new environment? Communication Quarterly, 55, 19–38. doi: 10.1080/01463370600998319
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. M., & Pascoe, G. C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 61–65. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.69.1.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, R., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). Do we know what we think we know? On the importance of replication in instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66, 479–481. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1342849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. M., & Vishak, J. (2008). Just laugh! You don’t need to remember: The effects of entertainment media on political information acquisition and information processing in political judgment. Journal of Communication, 58, 338–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. R. (2017). Raising new questions and restoring our focus on authentic student learning. Communication Education, 66, 120–122. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1243794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz, D. (1974). Effects of humor on persuasion. Sociometry, 37, 407–422. doi: 10.2307/2786391
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. M., Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., & Allen, M. (2006). A meta-analytic assessment of the effect of humorous lectures on learning. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 295–313). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. White (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Motivation and classroom learning. In W. M. Reynolds, & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 103–122). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo, & R. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–177). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavioral research. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 1–30). Corta Madera, CA: Select Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Fritz, J. B. (1993a). A causal model of sentence recall: Effects of familiarity, concreteness, comprehensibility, and interestingness. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 5–16. doi: 10.1080/10862969309547799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Fritz, J. B. (1993b). Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 291–304. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M., Goetz, E. T., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Engaging texts: Effects of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and recall in four text types. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 85–95. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoski, M. A., & Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 256–272. doi: 10.2307/747691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 953–967. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins, & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 527–561). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64, 385–418. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, C. M. (1987). A comparative study on the use of humor in the design of instruction. Instructional Science, 16, 79–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00120007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakshlag, J. J., Day, K. D., & Zillmann, D. (1981). Selective exposure to educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 27–32. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48, 48–62. doi: 10.1080/03634529909379152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/03634520903367238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., Wojtaszczyk, A. M., & Smith, T. (2006). Appropriate and inappropriate uses of humor by teachers. Communication Education, 55, 178–196. doi: 10.1080/03634520600566132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, J., Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988). Effects of humorous distortions on children’s learning from educational television: Further evidence. Communication Education, 37, 181–187. doi: 10.1080/03634528809378717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 170–180. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.72.2.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 5–15. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1988.10806492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar