Student-to-student confirmation in the college classroom: the development and validation of the Student-to-Student Confirmation Scale

References

• Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, N. D., Furst, E. J., Will, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2015). Students’ affective learning as affective experience: Significance, reconceptualization, and future directions. Communication Education, 64, 502–505. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2017). Development and validation of the clarity indicators scale. Communication Education, 66, 19–36. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1202994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research strategies on motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45, 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. C., Eichhorn, K. C., Basch, C., & Wolf, R. (2009). Exploring the relationship between teacher confirmation, gender, and student effort in the college classroom. Human Communication, 12, 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. doi: 10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cissna, K. N., & Sieburg, E. (1981). Patterns of interactional confirmation and disconfirmation. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Bridges not walls (pp. 237–246). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L., Campbell, S. E., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 60–83. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2000.11780816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deemer, E. D. (2010). Achievement goals as predictors of research self-efficacy. Individual Differences Research, 8, 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, K. K., Bingham, S. G., Carlson, R. E., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A. M., & Fuss, D. A. (2004). Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the connected classroom climate inventory. Communication Research Reports, 21, 264–272. doi: 10.1080/08824090409359988
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.200.tb00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H. (2002). Comment on halo effects in rating and evaluation research. Human Communication Research, 28, 578–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00825.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi: 10.1080/03634520903564362
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Sidelinger, R. J. (2013). Violating student expectations: Student disclosures and student reactions in the college classroom. Communication Studies, 64, 241–258. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2012.755636
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, B. J., & Kennedy, C. W. (1986). Confirmation and disconfirmation in nurse/physician communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 14, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/00909888609360300
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Z. W., Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between teacher confirmation and learning outcomes: Examining cultural differences in Turkish, Chinese, and American classrooms. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 43, 45–63. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2013.870087
   Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K. (2011). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–440. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi: 10.1080/03634520701787777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L. (1994). A step by step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. I. (2009). Connected classroom climate: A validity study. Communication Research Reports, 26, 146–157. doi: 10.1080/08824090902861622
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Z. D., & LaBelle, S. (2016). Student-to-student confirmation in the college classroom: An initial investigation of the dimensions and outcomes of students’ confirming messages. Communication Education, 65, 44–63. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge 6th ed.: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R. D. (1961). The self and others. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. R. (2015). The instructional communication affective learning paradox. Communication Education, 64, 510–515. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1066020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356–362. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.31.3.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T., & Banas, J. (2002). One-tailed F tests in communication research. Communication Monographs, 69, 132–143. doi: 10.1080/714041709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Graham, E. E. (2015). Measurement in instructional communication research: A decade in review. Communication Education, 64, 208–240. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.1002509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazer, J. P., & Thompson, B. (2011). The validity of the student academic support scale: Associations with social support and relational closeness. Communication Reports, 24, 74–85. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2011.622237
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale, & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication (pp. 56–71). Annandale,VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y. G., & Smith, D. A. F. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Goodboy, A. G. (2015). Reconsidering the conceptualization and operationalization of affective learning. Communication Education, 64, 493–497. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A. (2001). Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom: Effects on student perceptions of climate, apprehension, and state motivation. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 113–137. doi: 10.1080/10570310109374696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. doi: 10.1080/03634528609388318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossell, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., Ledbetter, A. M., & Ohrt, J. K. (2007). Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children’s mental well-being. Journal of Family Communication, 7, 23–46. doi: 10.1080/15267430709336667
   Google Scholar
• Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Education, 59, 165–184. doi: 10.1080/03634520903390867
   Google Scholar
• Sieburg, E. (1973). Interpersonal confirmation: A paradigm for conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international communication association, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sollitto, M., Johnson, Z. D., & Myers, S. A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of college classroom connectedness, assimilation, and peer relationships. Communication Education, 62, 318–331. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2013.788726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51. doi: 10.3102/00346543069001021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2008). How college freshmen communicate student academic support: A grounded theory study. Communication Education, 57, 123–144. doi: 10.1080/03634520701576147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., & Mazer, J. P. (2009). College student ratings of student academic support: Frequency, importance, and modes of communication. Communication Education, 58, 433–458. doi: 10.1080/03634520902930440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 8, 1–19. doi: 10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. (2012). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veksler, A. E., & Boren, J. P. (2017). Communicatively restricted organizational stress (CROS) II: Development and validation of the CROS-14. Communication Methods and Measures, 11, 137–149. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2017.1299120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J., & LaBelle, S. (2016). Theoretical and methodological approaches to instructional communication. In P. Witt (Ed.), Communication and learning (pp. 67–101). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 24 (pp. 207–229). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Waldeck, J. H., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (2010). Theoretical and methodological foundations of instructional communication research. In D. Fassett, & J. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of instructional communication (pp. 161–180). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2011). The development and testing of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 60, 51–74. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar