“As good as your word”: face-threat mitigation and the use of instructor nonverbal cues on students’ perceptions of digital feedback

References

• Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2008). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 71–81. doi: 10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Carson, C. L. (2002). Characteristics and consequences of interpersonal complaints associated with perceived face threat. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 443–462. doi: 10.1177/0265407502019004047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191–233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domenici, K., & Littlejohn, S. W. (2006). Facework: Bridging theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Westerman, D. (2016). Initial interaction expectations with robots: Testing the human-to-human interaction script. Communication Studies, 67(2), 227–238. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2015.1121899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Harmondsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. doi: 10.1080/08923649709526970
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 171–187. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., Trees, A. R., & Hess, J. A. (2008). Attentive facework during instructional feedback: Key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment. Communication Education, 57(3), 312–332. doi: 10.1080/03634520802027347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional feedback II: How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63, 498–517. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.632660
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Anthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. J. (2009). The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 235–261. doi: 10.1080/03634520802515705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
   Google Scholar
• Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale, & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication. (pp. 56–71). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communications Monographs, 66, 90–103. doi: 10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L., & Hecht, B. (2016). “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2016 (pp. 259–268). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., & Rauh, C. (2005). The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 153–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfrey, J. G., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E., Kim, K., & del Pobil, A. (2011). The effects of a robot instructor’s positive vs. negative feedbacks on attraction and acceptance towards the robot in classroom. Social Robotics, 3, 135–141. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_14
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Riniolo, T. C., Johnson, K. C., Sherman, T. R., & Misso, J. A. (2006). Hot or not: Do professors perceived as physically attractive receive higher student evaluations? The Journal of General Psychology, 133, 19–35. doi: 10.3200/GENP.133.1.19-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2007). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14, 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Trad, L., Katt, J., & Miller, A. N. (2014). The effect of face threat mitigation on instructor credibility and student motivation in the absence of instructor nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 63, 136–148. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.889319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009). Earning influence by communicating respect: Facework’s contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 397–416. doi: 10.1080/03634520802613419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education 2016 (NCES 2016–144).
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of facework and immediacy on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Education, 60, 75–94. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.507820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, S., Nie, J., Suh, K., & Sundar, S. S. (2011, March). When the robot criticizes you … : Self-serving bias in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 295–296). doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957778
   Google Scholar