Freedom of speech and the communication discipline: defending the value of low-value speech

References

• Barnlund, D. C. (1970). A transactional model of communication. In J. Akin, A. Goldberg, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Language and behavior: A book of readings in communication (pp. 43–62). Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, H. (2017, April 9). Protesters disrupt talk by pro-police author, sparking free-speech debate at Claremont McKenna College. Los Angeles Times.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940).
   Google Scholar
• Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
   Google Scholar
• Chemerinsky, E., & Gillman, H. (2017). Free speech on campus. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Corry v. Stanford, No. 740309 (Ca. Super. Ct., Santa Clara County, February 27, 1995).
   Google Scholar
• Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 F.Supp. 852 (E.D. Mich. 1989).
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, T. I. (1970). The system of freedom of expression. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Finan, C. M. (2008). From the Palmer raids to the Patriot Act: A history of the fight for free speech in America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation for Individual Rights. (2000–2017). Disinvitation attempts. Retrieved from https://www.thefire.org/resources/disinvitation-database/#home/
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, T. (2017, April 19). Berkeley cancels Ann Coulter speech over safety fears. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Gard, S. W. (1980). Fighting words as free speech. Washington University Law Quarterly, 58, 531–581.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925).
   Google Scholar
• Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, F. S. (1964). Some reflections on the teaching of freedom of speech. Free Speech Yearbook, 3, 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, F. S. (1965). Freedom of speech: Issues and cases. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, F. S. (1976). Freedom of speech. Skokie, IL: National Textbook.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, F. S. (1981). Speech and law in a free society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, F. S. (2003). Introduction. In R. A. Parker (Ed.), Free speech on trial: Communication perspectives on landmark Supreme Court decisions (pp. 1–8). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalven, H. Jr. (1988). A worthy tradition: Freedom of speech in America. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, W. (2008, July). On the origins of speech as a discipline: James A. Winans and public speaking as practical democracy. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 38, 239–258. doi: 10.1080/02773940801958446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakier, G. (2015). The invention of low-value speech. Harvard Law Review, 128, 2167–2233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis v. City of New Orleans, 408 U.S. 913 (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, M. J. (1989, April). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2320–2381. doi: 10.2307/1289306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtrie, B. (2017, May). Mayhem at Berkeley hardens new battle lines on free speech. In Dealing with controversial speakers on campus (pp. 4–5). Focus: The Chronicle of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. A. (Ed.). (2003). Free speech on trial: Communication perspectives on landmark Supreme Court decisions. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Laws of New Hampshire, Chapter 378, § 2.
   Google Scholar
• Saul, S. (2017, May 24). Dozens of Middlebury students are disciplined for Charles Murray. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Shiell, T. C. (1998). Campus hate speech on trial. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, G. (2012, July). Statement on principles of free inquiry. UChicagoNews. Retrieved from https://news.uchicago.edu/behind-the-news/free-expression/statement-principles-free-inquiry
   Google Scholar
• Tedford, T. L. (1985). Freedom of speech in the United States. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• UWM Post v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin, 774 F.Supp, 1163 (E.D. Wis. 1991).
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
   Google Scholar
• Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
   Google Scholar