Regulatory fit explains the effects of speech grades on students’ intended effort

References

• Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66(2), 129–147. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1993). The role of cognitive “performance orientation” in communication anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 41, 198–209.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, N. A., & Yun, K. A. (2017). A survey of instructional communication: 15 years of research in review. Communication Education, 66(4), 451–466. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1348611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 571–581. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116912
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., Housley-Gaffney, A. L., & Martin, K. N. (2011). Students’ talk about the climate of feedback interventions in the critique. Communication Education, 60, 95–114. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.487111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., Grant, H., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Success/failure feedback, expectancies, and approach/avoidance motivation: How regulatory focus moderates classic relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 253–260. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, T. J., Smilowitz, M., Foster, M. S., & Phelps, L. A. (1990). Some student perceptions of grades received on speeches. Basic Communication Course Annual, 2, 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2015). Perception is reality: The role of individual differences in the feedback process. In J. B. Gregory, & P. E. Levy (Eds.), Using feedback in organizational consulting (pp. 63–79). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Feedback in schools. In R. M. Sutton, M. J. Hornsey, & K. M. Douglas (Eds.), Feedback: The communication of praise, criticism, and advice (pp. 265–277). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, J. A., & Mazer, J. P. (2017). Looking forward: Envisioning the immediate future of instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66(4), 474–475. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1359640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 61–93). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2014). Beyond pleasure and pain: Value from engagement. In J. P. Forgas, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Motivation and its regulation: The control within (pp. 21–34). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Roney, C., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from non-losses and losses from non-gains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, R., & Tatum, N. T. (2017). Do we know what we think we know? On the importance of replication in instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66(4), 479–481. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1342849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Terry, C. L. (2016). Communication instructional feedback: Definitions, explanations, principles, and questions. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Vol. 16, communication and learning (pp. 287–318). Berlin, Germany: DeGruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional feedback II: How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63, 498–517. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.632660
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2015). Instructional feedback III: How do instructor facework tactics and immediacy cues interact to predict student perceptions of being mentored? Communication Education, 64, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E. (2016). When do students benefit from performance feedback? A test of feedback intervention theory in speaking improvement. Communication Quarterly, 64, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2015.1078827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. J. (2009). The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 235–261. doi: 10.1080/03634520802515705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Young, M. J., & Behnke, R. R. (2000). Public speaking performance improvement as a function of information processing in immediate and delayed feedback interventions. Communication Education, 49, 365–374.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N. (2001). Feedback-expectation discrepancy, arousal, and locus of cognition. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 111–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., Lewinsohn, S., & Aiello, J. R. (1994). The influence of feedback on mood: Linear effects on pleasantness and curvilinear effects on arousal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 276–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & Nir, D. (2010). The feedforward interview. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, D. R. (2017). Raising new questions and restoring our focus on authentic student learning. Communication Education, 66, 120–122. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1243794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malachowski, C. C., Martin, M. M., & Vallade, J. I. (2013). An examination of students’ adaptation, aggression, and apprehension traits with their instructional feedback orientations. Communication Education, 62, 127–147. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.748208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano, H. (1997). Affect and persuasion: The influence of pleasantness and arousal on attitude formation and message elaboration. Psychology and Marketing, 14, 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Mottet, T. P. (2011). The effect of instructor nonverbal immediacy behaviors and feedback sensitivity on Hispanic students’ affective learning outcomes in ninth-grade writing conferences. Communication Education, 60, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.496868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meluch, A. L. (2017). Mixing methods in instructional research. Communication Education, 66(4), 477–479. doi: 10.1080/03634423.2017.1346265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Motivations for promotion and prevention. In J. Y. Shah, & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 169–187). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motley, M. (1990). Public speaking anxiety qua performance anxiety: Revised model and an alternative. In M. Booth-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition, and anxiety (pp. 85–104). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mottet, T. P., Parker-Raley, J., Beebe, S. A., & Cunningham, C. (2007). Instructors who resist ‘college-lite’: The neutralizing effect of instructor immediacy on students’ course-workload violations and perceptions of instructor credibility and affective learning. Communication Education, 56, 145–167. doi: 10.1080/03634520601164259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277–289. doi: 10.1080/0260293090351007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. L., & Anderson, S. (2010). The dilemma of grades: Reconciling disappointing grades with feelings of personal success. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 11, 51–56. doi: 10.1080/1749430903515228
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, C. R., & Richmond, V. P. (2015). Motivational factors and communication competence. In A. F. Hannawa, & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), Handbooks of communication science: Vol. 22, communication competence (pp. 193–212). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. D., & King, P. E. (2004). Student feedback sensitivity and the efficacy of feedback interventions in public speaking performance improvement. Communication Education, 53, 203–216. doi: 10.1080/0363452042000265152
   Google Scholar
• Trad, L., Katt, J., & Miller, A. N. (2014). The effect of face threat mitigation on instructor credibility and student motivation in the absence of instructor nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education, 63, 136–148. doi: 10/1080/03634523.2014.889319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009). Earning influence by communication respect: Facework’s contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58, 397–416. doi: 10.1080/03634520802613419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 113–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 1084–1105. doi: 10.1002/job.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L. (2017). Making tough choices to continue instructional communication research. Communication Education, 66(4), 494–496. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1350872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of facework and immediacy on students’ perceptions of instructional credibility. Communication Education, 60, 75–94. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.507820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar