Discourse strategies that co-construct relational identities in STEM peer tutoring

References

• Agne, R. R. (2010). Self-assessment as a dilemmatic communicative practice: Talk among psychics in training. Southern Communication Journal, 75, 306–327. doi: 10.1080/1041794x.2010.504438
   Google Scholar
• Agne, R. R. (2018). “You’re not listening”: Negotiating and problematizing ideal interaction through metatalk about listening in the Waco Standoff. Western Journal of Communication, 82, 356–375. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2017.1355979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agne, R. R., & Tracy, K. (2001). “Bible babble”: Naming the interactional trouble at Waco. Discourse Studies, 3, 269–294. doi: 10.1177/1461445601003003002
   Google Scholar
• Atkins-Sayer, W., & Yook, E. L. (2014). Training the trainers: Improving peer tutoring education. In W. Atkins-Syre & E. L. Yook (Eds.), Communicating advice: Peer tutoring and communication practice (pp. 261–275). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structure of social Action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. C., Arnold, H., & Haddock, R. (2009). Linguistic politeness and peer tutoring. The Learning Assistance Review, 14, 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. C., Laue, H. A., & Haddock, R. (2012). Politeness theory and effective tutoring and mentoring. In K. Agee & R. Hodges (Eds.), Handbook for training peer tutors and mentors (pp. 137–140). Manson, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berghmans, I., Neckebroeck, F., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). A typology of approaches to peer tutoring: Unraveling peer tutor behavioral strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 703–723. doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-0136-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, S. R., Hall, J., & Strauss, T. (1998). Exploring the tutor/client conversation: A linguistic analysis. Writing Center Journal, 19, 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bynum, Y. P. (2015). The power of informal mentoring. Education, 136(1), 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Carino, P. (2003). Power and authority in peer tutoring. In M. A. Pemberton & J. Kinkead (Eds.), The center will hold: Critical perspectives on writing center scholarship (pp. 96–113). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castor, T., & Bartesaghi, M. (2016). Metacommunication during disaster response: “Reporting” and the constitution of problems in Hurricane Katrina teleconferences. Management Communication Quarterly, 30, 472–502. doi: 10.1177/0893318916646454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, T., Rabow, J., & Estrada, J. (2011). Tutoring matters: Everything you always wanted to know about how to tutor (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, I. (2001). Perspectives on the directive/non-directive continuum in the writing center. Writing Center Journal, 21, 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cogie, J. (2001). Peer tutoring: Keeping the contradiction productive. In J. Nelson & K. Evertz (Eds.), The politics of writing centers (pp. 37–49). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, J. W. (2007). Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15, 165–181. doi: 10.1080/13611260601086345
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (2006). Communication as a practice. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as … : perspectives on theory (pp. 38–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (2014). Building grounded practical theory in applied communication research: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 229–243. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.916410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, L. (2002). Developing and retaining quality classroom teachers through mentoring. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 75(4), 183–185. doi: 10.1080/00098650209604927
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 50, 144–158. doi: 10.1080/03634520109379240
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., & Housley Gaffney, A. L. (2009). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy. Communication Education, 58, 124–153. doi: 10.1080/03634520802527288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feezel, J. D., & Myers, S. A. (1997). Assessing graduate assistant teacher communication concerns. Communication Quarterly, 45, 110–124. doi: 10.1080/01463379709370055
   Google Scholar
• Firkins, K. A., & Rolon, A. M. (2012). Developing deaf awareness. In K. Agee & R. Hodges (Eds.), Handbook for training peer tutors and mentors (pp. 213–215). Manson, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, K. L., & Sanders, R. E. (2005). Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, A., Callaway, S., & Wikoff, K. H. (1994). The role of authority and the authority of roles in peer writing tutorials. Journal of Teaching Writing, 12, 161–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, T. (1982). Intimacy and audience: The relationship between revision and the social dimension of peer tutoring. In M. Harris (Ed.), Tutoring writing: A sourcebook for writing labs (pp. 27–31). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., & Ma, Y. (2010). Mentoring and student persistence in college: A study of the Washington State Achievers Program. Innovative Higher Education, 35, 329–341. doi: 10.1007/s10755-010-9147-7
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, C., Wingard, L. M., Sabee, C., Olsher, D., & Vandergriff, I. (2014). Managing patient-centered communication across the type 2 diabetes illness trajectory: A grounded practical theory of interactional sensitivity. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 244–267. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.911943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178–195. doi: 10.17763/haer.55.2.56142234616x4352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1997). Understanding and managing classroom dilemmas in the service of good teaching. In N. C. Burbules & D. T. Hansen (Eds.), Teaching and its predicaments (pp. 145–161). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Chaiklin, S. (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeBaron, C. D., Mandelbaum, J., & Glenn, P. (2003). An overview of language and social interaction research. In P. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, A., & Mirivel, J. C. (2011). Reconstructing Merk’s practical theory of communication: The ethics of pharmaceutical sales representative-physician encounters. Communication Monographs, 78, 53–72. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.542578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, R. (1994). The master tutor: A guidebook for more effective tutoring (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge Stratford, LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Mirivel, J. C. (2008). The physical examination in cosmetic surgery: Communication strategies to promote the desirability of surgery. Health Communication, 23, 153–170. doi: 10.1080/10410230801968203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirivel, J. C., & Tracy, K. (2005). Pre-meeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 1–34. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C. (Ed.). (1992). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, H. L. (2014). A grounded practical theory reconstruction of the communication practice of instructor-facilitated collegiate classroom discussion. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 325–342. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.911941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packard, B. W. L., Walsh, L., & Seidenberg, S. (2004). Will that be one mentor or two? A cross-sectional study of women’s mentoring during college. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(1), 71–85. doi: 10.1080/1361126042000183039
   Google Scholar
• Park, I. (2014). Stepwise advice negotiation in writing center peer tutoring. Language and Education, 28, 362–382. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2013.873805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, N. K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies may inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 161–188. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips-Jones, L. (1983). Establishing a formalized mentoring program. Training & Development Journal, 37(2), 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips-Jones, L. (2003). The mentoring coordinator’s guide: How to plan and conduct a successful mentoring initiative. Grass Valley, CA: Coalition of Counseling Centers.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A., & Mandelbaum, J. (2005). Conversation analytic approaches to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 149–171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associate.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. R., Shofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 327–362. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-8137-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, J. S., & Ho, E. Y. (2014). Interactional formats and institutional context: A practical and exploitable distinction in interviews. Text and Talk, 34, 443–465. doi: 10.1515/text-2014-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534–574. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36, 321–350. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9034-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. E. (2005). Introduction: LSI as subject matter and as multidisciplinary confederation. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 1–15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associate.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., Rudick, C. K., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Golsan, K. (2018). Navigating instructional dialectics: Empirical exploration of paradox in teaching. Communication Education, 67, 7–30. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1388527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. (2009). Scaffolding in the writing center: A microanalysis of an experienced tutor’s verbal and nonverbal tutoring strategies. Written Communication, 26, 417–453. doi: 10.1177/0741088309342364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, C. E. (2015). Peer tutoring and customer service. In W. Atkins-Syre & E. L. Yook (Eds.), Communicating advice: Peer tutoring and communication practice (pp. 261–275). New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631–645. doi: 10.1080/01443410500345172
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1995). Action-implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 195–215. doi: 10.1177/0261927X95141011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1997a). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 315–343. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1997b). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2005). Reconstructing communicative practices: Action-implicative discourse analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 301–322). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges in ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Agne, R. R. (2002). “I just need to ask somebody some questions”: Sensitivities in domestic dispute calls. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 75–90). New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Anderson, D. L. (1999). Relational positioning strategies in police calls: A dilemma. Discourse Studies, 1, 201–225. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001002004
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Ashcraft, C. (2001). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 297–316. doi: 10.1080/00909880128115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Craig, R. T. (2010). Studying interaction in order to cultivate communicative practices: Action implicative discourse analysis. In J. Streeck (Ed.), New adventures in language and interaction (pp. 145–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Hughes, J. M. F. (2014). Democracy-appealing partisanship: A situated ideal of citizenship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 307–324. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2014.911940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Muller, H. L. (2001). Diagnosing a school board’s interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory, 11, 84–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Robles, J. S. (2011). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting relationships. New York: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a school superintendent: Sensitivities in group deliberation. In L. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 109–134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Traianou, A. (2012). Science teaching: A dilemmatic approach. Ethnography and Education, 7, 213–226. doi: 10.1080/17457823.2012.693694
   Google Scholar
• Trimbur, J. (1987). Peer tutoring: A contradiction in terms. Writing Center Journal, 7, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Turowetz, J. (2017). On the use of “I just thought” formulations for modifying one’s stance toward a problematic action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 348–362. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• Varakin, J. E. (2012). Tutoring and mentoring students with disabilities. In K. Agee & R. Hodges (Eds.), Handbook for training peer tutors and mentors (pp. 218–221). Manson, OH: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. (2005). Peer tutoring in a graduate writing center: Identity, expertise, and advice resisting. Applied Linguistics, 26, 141–168. doi: 10.1093/applin/amh041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, P. (2016). Uptalk: The phenomenon of rising intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225–246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar