Engineering identity and communication outcomes: comparing integrated engineering and traditional public-speaking courses

References

• ABET. (2018). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018–2019. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2017). Icek Ajzen: Theory of planned behavior. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/tpb.html
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, M. J., Behnke, R. R., & Froelich, D. L. (1980). Effects of achievement incentive and presentation rate on listening comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 193–200. doi: 10.1080/00335638009383515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Yuan, S., & Lawrence, F. (2018). Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Science Communication, 40(5), 559–590. doi: 10.1177/1075547018786561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S. (2015). Students’ affective learning as affective experiences: Significance, reconceptualization, and future directions. Communication Education, 64(4), 502–505. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Exploratory theoretical tests of the instructor humor- student learning link. Communication Education, 64, 45–64. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2014.978793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (2009). Connecting with the big picture. Educational Psychologist, 44, 147–157. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buerkle, C. W., Gearhart, C. C., & Oliveira, C. M. (2017). According to, student motivations … : A theory of planned behavior investigation of students’ intention to orally cite sources. Communication Reports, 30, 157–169. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2017.1280737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, V. (2011). Teaching oral communication in undergraduate science: Are we doing enough and doing it right? Journal of Learning Design, 4(3). Retrieved from https://www.jld.edu.au/article/view/82 doi: 10.5204/jld.v4i3.82
   Google Scholar
• Colton, J. S., & Surasinghe, T. D. (2014). Using collaboration between English and biology to teach scientific writing and communication. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(2), 31–39. doi: 10.2505/4/jcst14_044_02_31
   Google Scholar
• Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2016–2017. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/#GC3
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, M., & Glenn, P. (1991). Communication across the curriculum in higher education: The state of the art. Communication Education, 40, 356–367. doi: 10.1080/03634529109378860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P. (2000). Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(1), 5–37. doi: 10.1177/105065190001400101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P. (2001). Time to speak up: A theoretical framework of situated pedagogy and practice for communication across the curriculum. Communication Education, 50, 144–158. doi: 10.1080/03634520109379240
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51, 254–268. doi: 10.1080/03634520216513
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., & Gaffney, A. H. (2009). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy. Communication Education, 58, 124–153. doi: 10.1080/03634520802527288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., Anson, C. M., Bullard, L., & Peretti, S. (2003). Challenges in learning communication skills in chemical engineering. Communication Education, 52, 50–56. doi: 10.1080/03634520302454
   Google Scholar
• Darling, A. L., & Dannels, D. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace. Communication Education, 52, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03634520302457
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Doll, J., & Ajzen, I. (1992). Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 754–765. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, F. C. R., & Davis, L. S. (2015). Improving visual communication of science through incorporation of graphic design theories and practices into science communication. Science Communication, 37, 140–148. doi: 10.1177/1075547014562914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Philippines: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, A. (2005). Liberal education and communication against the disciplines. Communication Education, 54, 72–79. doi: 10.1080/03634520500077032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote, N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 16, 14–21. doi: 10.2307/2087964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 325–328. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00776.x
   Google Scholar
• Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2010). Motivation requires a meaningful task. The English Journal, 100, 30–36. doi: 10.2307/20787688
   Google Scholar
• Funk, C. (2017). Mixed messages about public trust in science. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/12/08/mixed-messages-about-public-trust-in-science/
   Google Scholar
• Godwin, A. (2016). The development of a measure of engineering identity. Paper presented at the ASEE’s 123rd Annual Conference and exposition, New Orleans: LA. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/14814/view
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, M. R. C., & Riordan, D. G. (2001). Civic scientist/civic duty. Science Communication, 23, 28–40. doi: 10.1177/1075547001023001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M. J., & Hatful, G. F. (2017). A measure of college student persistence in the sciences (PITS). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15), doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-09-0185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., & Shanahan, M. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 978–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser, M. L., Cowan, R. L., & West, D. A. (2007). Investigating a new education Frontier: Instructor communication behavior in CD-ROM texts—do traditionally positive behaviors translate into this new environment? Communication Quarterly, 55, 19–38. doi: 10.1080/01463370600998319
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• La Guardia, J. G. (2009). Developing who I am: A self- determination theory approach to the establishment of healthy identities. Educational Psychologist, 44, 90–104. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. I. (2003). Public engagement with science. Science, 299(5609), 977. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5609.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. I. (2007). Outreach training needed. Science, 315(5809), 161. doi: 10.1126/science.1138712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.-Y., & Peters, H. P. (2015). Taiwanese life scientists less “medialized” than their Western colleagues. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 6–22. doi: 10.1177/0963662513513863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel-Dupont, S. (1996). Writing-across-the curriculum in an engineering program. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(1), 35–40. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00205.x
   Google Scholar
• Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., & Miller, R. L. (2010). Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students’ motivational values. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 289–303. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale, & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication (pp. 55–69). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, M. (2011). Say what?: The importance of effective communication in engineering. The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 63, 25. doi: 10.1007/s11837-011-0201-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. (1992). When politeness is fatal: Technical communication and the challenger accident. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, 269–292. doi: 10.1177/1050651992006003001
   Google Scholar
• Morelock, J. R. (2017). A systematic literature review of engineering identity: Definitions, factors, and interventions affecting development, and means of measurement. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42, 1240–1262. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1287664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Reconsidering the conceptualization and operationalization of affective learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 493–497. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-technology-public-attitudes-and-understanding/highlights
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Markowitz, E. (2015). Public engagement research and major approaches. Commissioned Annotated Bibliography in Support of the Leshner Leadership Institute American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/content_files/Biblio_PublicEngagement_FINAL11.25.15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Mooney, C. (2007). Framing science. Science, 316(5821), 56. doi: 10.1126/science.1142030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Personal and environmental influences on students’ beliefs about effective study strategies. Contemporary Ediucational Psychology, 15, 116–130. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(90)90011-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose, A. M., & Katz, S. B. (2010). Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Poliakoff, E., & Webb, T. L. (2007). What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities. Science Communication, 29, 242–263. doi: 10.1177/1075547007308009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. doi: 10.1080/03634529009378801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165–185. doi: 10.1007/BF00991650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, M.-C. (2009). Identity in science learning: Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 43–64. doi: 10.1080/03057260802681847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speaking and listening competencies for college students. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/pages/Assessment_Resources_Speaking_and_Listening_Competencies_for_College_Students.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spretnak, C. M. (1982). A survey of the frequency and importance of technical communication in an engineering career. Technical Writing Teacher, 9, 133–136.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfatt, T. M. (1986). Communication across the curriculum. Communication Quarterly, 34, 460–470. doi: 10.1080/01463378609369663
   Google Scholar
• Thweatt, K. S., & Wrench, J. S. (2015). Affective learning: Evolving from values and planned behaviors to internalization and persuasive behavioral change. Communication Education, 64(4), 497–499. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1058964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. Retrieved from https://imai.fas.harvard.edu/research/files/mediationR2.pdf doi: 10.18637/jss.v059.i05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingley, D., Yamamota, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (n.d.). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mediation/vignettes/mediation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In A. Johri, & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 267–282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veis, C. A. (2017). Public speaking for engineers: Communicating effectively with clients, the public, and local government. Reston, VA: ASCE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vrchota, D. (2011). Communication in the disciplines: Interpersonal communication in dietetics. Communication Education, 60(2), 210–230. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2010.523475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Wagner, A. L. (2005). Competence, motivation and identity development during adolescence. In A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 222–239). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar