Public address as embodied experience: using digital technologies to enhance communicative and civic engagement in the communication classroom

References

• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ballinger, C. (2008). Verification. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 914–914). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, L. L. (2012). Why we use service-learning: A report outlining a typology of three approaches to this for communication pedagogy. Communication Education, 61(1), 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, J. (2011). Undergraduate political communication in action: Volunteer experience in a situated learning course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A., Jonassen, D., Litzinger, M., & Marra, R. (1998). Good ideas to foment educational revolution: The role of systemic change in advancing situated learning, constructivism, and feminist pedagogy. Educational Technology, 38(1), 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4(3), 5–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, K., & Scacco, J. M. (2017). Quantitative content analysis. In J. Matthes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 346–356). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cyphert, D. (2007). Presentation technology in the age of electronic eloquence: From visual aid to visual rhetoric. Communication Education, 56(2), 168–192. doi: 10.1080/03634520601173136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Pedagogy: The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. (2002). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: Speaking in engineering. Communication Education, 51(3), 254–268.
   Google Scholar
• Dawley, L., & Dede, C. (2014). Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 723–734). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiFrancesco, P. (2011). The role of situated learning in experiential education: An ethnographic study of the knowledge-construction process of pharmacy students during their clinical rotations (Unpublished dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2001). Experiential learning: A theoretical critique from five perspectives. Information Series no. 385.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, A., & Ledbetter, A. (2013). Teacher power mediates the effects of technology policies on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 62(1), 26–47. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2012.725132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L., & Palmer, D. L. (2017). Communication activism pedagogy and research: Communication education scholarship to promote social justice. Communication Education, 66(3), 362–367. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2017.1290812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated learning and language: A critique of traditional schooling. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. (2016). Civic engagement. In A. de Souza e Silva (Ed.), Dialogues on mobile communication (pp. 156–171). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansman, C. A. (2001). Context-based adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Henthorn, T. (2014). Experiencing the city: Experiential learning in urban environments. Journal of Urban History, 40(3), 450–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, K. (1999). Digital sensations: Space, identity, and embodiment in virtual reality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, A., & Tighe, J. (2020). From the other side of the desk: Students’ discourses of teaching and learning. Communication Education, 69(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M., Kurr, J. A., Johnson, J. D., & Bergmaier, M. J. (2016). Speech and debate as civic education. Communication Education, 65(4), 377–381. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2016.1203002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. (2016). Mobile social networks. In A. de Souza e Silva (Ed.), Dialogues on mobile communication (pp. 121–138). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, I. C., Hsu, H. H., Chen, N. S. (2015). Communicating through body: A situated embodiment-based strategy with flag semaphore for procedural knowledge construction. Education Technology Research Development, 63(5), 749–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. K., Simonds, C. J., & Simonds, B. K. (2009). Uniquely qualified, distinctively competent: Delivering 21st century skills in the basic course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 21(1), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, W. (1996). Learning, culture, and learning culture. Adult Education Quarterly, 47(1), 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelm, O. R. (2011). Social media: It’s what students do. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 505–520.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K., & Chang, R. (2008). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/kennedy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, K. W., & Hong, K. S. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanham, R. A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 2, 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leek, D. R. (2016). Policy debate pedagogy: A complementary strategy and political engagement through service learning. Communication Education, 65(4), 397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, D. (2012).  Social media: Changing advertising education. Online Journal of Communication & Media Technologies, 2(1), 116–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunce, L. (2006). Simulations: Bringing the benefits of situated learning to the traditional classroom. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 3(1), 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. A. (2014). Mobile media and political participation: Defining and developing an emerging field. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(2), 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, C. (2018). Situated learning. London: Macat Library.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Soldani, X., & Kloos, C. D. (2015). Lessons learned from the design of situated learning environments to support collaborative knowledge construction. Computers & Education, 87, 70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rambusch, J., & Ziemke, T. (2005, July). The role of embodiment in situated learning. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1803–1808). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Salaway, G., Caruso, J. B., & Nelson, M. R. (2008). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology (Research Study, Vol. 8). EDUCAUSE.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native – myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364–379. doi: 10.1108/00012530910973776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., Pertaub, D. P., Barker, C., & Clark, D. M. (2006). An experimental study on fear of public speaking using a virtual environment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 627–633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slater, M., Pertaub, D. P., & Steed, A. (1999). Public speaking in virtual reality: Facing an audience of avatars. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(2), 6–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, D. (1998). Situated learning in adult education. ERIC Digest No. 195. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED418250.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Upchurch, W. R. (2014). Public address as the basic communication course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 26(1), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A., & Fassett, D. L. (2003). Remote Control: Identity, power, and technology in the communication classroom. Communication Education, 52(3–4), 286–296. doi: 10.1080/0363452032000156253
   Google Scholar
• Yeoman, P., & Wilson, S. (2019). Designing for situated learning: Understanding the relations between material properties, designed form and emergent learning activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2090–2108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar