The virtual classroom divide: how does the self-efficacy gap reshape online learning?

References

• Akpan, S. J., Etim, P. J., & Udom, S. O. (2016). Virtual classroom instruction and academic performance of educational technology students in distance education, enugu state. World Journal of Education, 6(6), 83–88. https://eric.ed.gov/?id = EJ1157667
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024
   Google Scholar
• Breyer, C., Wilfling, K., Leitenbauer, C., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2020). The self-efficacy of learning and support assistants in the Austrian inclusive education context. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1706255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHLOE. (2023). 2023 CHLOE 8 report. Quality Matters. https://qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/resource-center/articles-resources/CHLOE-8-report-2023
   Google Scholar
• Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–324. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1614680259?pq-origsite = gscholar&fromopenview = true
   Google Scholar
• Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Kawas, S. A., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2018). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Wang, M. T., & Brauer, S. (2019). Profiles of school disengagement: Not all disengaged students are alike. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 31–43). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, T. K. (2021). Overcoming technological barriers to instruction: Situating Gen Z students as reverse mentors. Frontiers in Communication, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.630899
   Google Scholar
• Garland, M. E., & Violanti, M. (2021). Rock my world: Rewind to a better transition to remote learning. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.641873
   Google Scholar
• Goke, R., Berndt, M., & Rocker, K. (2021). Classroom culture when students are reluctant to learn online: Student dissent behaviors explained by their self-efficacy, control of learning, and intrinsic motivation. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.641956
   Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). Diversity of social ties and creativity: Creative self-efficacy as mediator and tie strength as moderator. Human Relations, 73(12), 1664–1688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719866001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, P. A., Jr., Leuwerke, W. C., & Turley, S. E. (2005). A psychometric study of the college self-efficacy inventory. Journal of College Student Retention, 7(3-4), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/5CQF-F3P4-2QAC-GNVJ
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/104648
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Universities. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world. Retrieved June 18, 2021, from https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. L., & Lockee, B. B. (2018). Self-efficacy research in online learning. In C. B. Hodges (Ed.), Self-efficacy in instructional technology contexts (pp. 3–13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99858-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. L., & Kelly, S. (2020). Student predispositions as predictors of dissent behaviors in supply chain courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. L., Park, A., & Kelly, S. (2023). The effect of instructor communication on affective learning in a supply chain management course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Early Access. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12305
   Google Scholar
• Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2020). Damage caused by women’s lower self-efficacy on physics learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2023). Instructional communication during pandemics. In S. M. Croucher, & A. Diers-Lawson (Eds.), Pandemic communication (pp. 197–214). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Terry, C. (2016). 12. Communicating instructional feedback: Definitions, explanations, principles, and questions. In P. Witt (Ed.), Communication and learning (pp. 287–318). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502446-013.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O. E., Kim, S. Y., & Gezer, T. (2021). Factors associated with online learning self-efficacy among students with disabilities in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2021.1979344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, E. K., & Nordquist, E. K. (2016). Asynchronous learning: Student utilization out of sync with their preference. Medical Education Online, 21(1), 30587. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.30587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Crossley, S. A., Meyers, K., Boser, U., Allen, L. K., Chaudhri, V. K., Collins-Thompson, K., D’Mello, S., Choudhury, M. D., Garg, K., Goel, A., Gosha, K., Heffernan, N., Hooper, M. A., Hyman, E., Jarratt, D. C., Khalil, D., Kizilcec, R. F., Litman, D., … Zampieri, M. (2022). Toward more effective and equitable learning: Identifying barriers and solutions for the future of online education. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000063
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale, & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication. Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Postbaccalaureate enrollment. Condition of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/chb
   Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39(3), 497–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00950.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2008). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippé, C. B., Weisfeld-Spolter, S., Yurova, Y., & Kemp, A. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy for the new normal: Fostering perceived control during COVID-19. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475320987287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmering, M. J., Posey, C., & Piccoli, G. (2009). Computer self-efficacy and motivation to learn in a self-directed online course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00207.x
   Google Scholar
• Soland, J., & Sandilos, L. E. (2021). English language learners, self-efficacy, and the achievement gap: Understanding the relationship between academic and social-emotional growth. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 26(1), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2020.1787171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
   Google Scholar
• Vattøy, K. D. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about feedback practice as related to student self-regulation, self-efficacy, and language skills in teaching English as a foreign language. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, M., Brown-Welty, S., & Tracz, S. (2010). The effects of self-efficacy on academic success of first-generation college sophomore students. Journal of College Student Development, 51(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, socioemotional processes (Vol. 3, pp. 657–700). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Kelly, S., Kim, J., & Goke, R. (2023). Why students feel more satisfied with synchronous learning: The mediation effects of social presence on online course satisfaction. Journal of Media Education, 14(4), 23–31. https://www.calameo.com/journal-of-media-education/read/0000917899afda709c449
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Kim, J., Kelly, S., & Merrill Jr, K. (2022). Learning in the online classroom: Exploring the unique influence of social presence dimensions. Communication Studies, 73(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2074491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar