The impact of forms of strategic and non‐strategic voir dire questions on jury verdicts

References

• Arbuthnot , J. 1986 . Jurors’ views on due process and the death penalty: A sociomoral framework for voir dire and jury selection . Social Action and the Law , 12 : 3 – 9 . 27 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Arsenault , D.J. and Reinard , J.C. 1997 . The effect of attorney‐directed question types in voir dire upon jury deliberation, defendant culpability, and attorney sociability. Paper presented at the Pacific Psychological Association Convention . April 1997 , Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey , F.L. and Rothblatt , H. 1971 . Successful techniques for criminal trials. , New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston. .
   Google Scholar
• Balch , R.W. , Griffiths , C.T. , Hall , E.T. and Winfree , L.T. 1976 . Socialization of jurors: The voir dire as a rite of passage . Journal of Criminal Justice , 4 : 271 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellow , G. and Moulton , B. 1978 . The lawyering process: Materials for clinical instruction in advocacy. , Mineola, N.Y. : The Foundation Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bennett , C. and Hirschorn , R. 1993 . Bennett's guide to jury selection and trial dynamics in civil and criminal litigation , (2nd ed.) , St. Paul, MN : West .
   Google Scholar
• Blue , L. , Saginaw , J.N. and Donner , T. 1986 . Jury selection: Strategy & science , (updated ed.) , Rochester, NY : Clark Boardman Callaghan .
   Google Scholar
• Blunk , R.A. and Sales , B.D. 1977 . “ Persuasion during the voir dire. ” . In Psychology in the legal process. , Edited by: Sales , B. New York : Spectrum .
   Google Scholar
• Branson , F.L. and Branson , D.D. 1992 . Successful voir dire . Trial , 25 (2) : 21 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Broeder , D.W. 1965 . Voir dire examinations: An empirical study . Southern California Law Review , 38 : 503 – 528 .
   Google Scholar
• Bulk , J.D. and Anderson , J.A. 1981 . Becoming sensitized to fair trial issues . Wisconsin Sociologist , 18 (4) : 111 – 118 .
   Google Scholar
• Bush , N. 1976 . The case for expansive voir dire . Law and Psychology Review , 2 : 9 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Crump , D. 1980 . Attorneys’ goals and tactics in voir dire examination . Texas Bar Journal , 43 : 244 – 246 .
   Google Scholar
• Curke , D.L. September 15 1995 . Communication tips to tap into the jury's needs. , September 15 , Nashville, TN : Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Continuing Legal Education .
   Google Scholar
• Dexter , H.R. , Cutler , B.L. and Moran , G. 1992 . A tests of voir dire as a remedy for the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 22 : 819 – 832 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahs , M.L. 1992 . New question types for voir dire: Tools for reducing trial and error. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention . February 1992 , Boise, ID.
   Google Scholar
• Fenyes , J.E. 1994 . Jury selection from a social science perspective. , Nashville, TN : Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Continuing Legal Education. .
   Google Scholar
• Forensic Technologies International Corporation . 1997 . Jury selection: Voir dire , February 24 [On‐line]. Available: http://www.clark.net/fti/j_select.html
   Google Scholar
• Forston , R. 1973 . Juror reactions to pattern instructions. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention . November 1973 , Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick , J.T. 1995 . Mastering voir dire and jury selection: Gaining an edge in questioning and selecting a jury. , Chicago, IL : General Practice Session, American Bar Association .
   Google Scholar
• Gaudineer , L. 1974 . Ethics: The zealous advocate . Drake Law Review , 24 : 79 – 104 .
   Google Scholar
• Ginger , A.F. 1974 . The practice of voir dire . Jury Selection and Social Psychology Bulletin , 1 : 279 – 287 .
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales , E.A. 1997 . Advanced trial handbook: Jury selection , June 16 [On‐line]. Available: http://www.robles‐gonzales.com/handbook/hbjury.html
   Google Scholar
• Hans , V.P. 1986 . The conduct of voir dire: A psychological analysis . The Justice System Journal , 11 (2) : 40 – 58 .
   Google Scholar
• Penrod , Hastie R. and Pennington , N. 1983 . Inside the jury. , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , C. and Haney , C. 1994 . Felony voir dire: An exploratory study of its content and effect . Law and Human Behavior , 18 : 487 – 506 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , D.C. 1983 . Voir dire in the criminal case: A primer . Trial , 75 (10) : 61 – 65 .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , S.E. 1987 . Judge‐ versus attorney‐conducted voir dire: An empirical investigation of juror candor . Law and Human Behavior , 11 : 131 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan , M.F. and Miller , L.E. 1987 . “ Reducing the effects of juror bias ” . In In the jury box: Controversies in the courtroom. , Edited by: Wrightsman , L.S. , Kassin , S.M. and Willis , C.E. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Keeton , R.E. 1973 . Trial tactics and methods , (2nd ed.) , Boston : Litde, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Leben , M.K. 1997 . Guidelines for voir dire examination in jury trials , June 26 [On‐line]. Available: http:// www.fl.judges.com/LebanV1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lehman , G. 1983 . The unconstitutionality of voir dire, peremptory challenges and jury books in jury selection . Lincoln Law Review , 14 : 53 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Lynch , M.D. 1968 . The measurement of human interest . Journalism Quarterly , 45 : 226 – 234 .
   Google Scholar
• Marquis , K.H. , Marshall , J. and Oskamp , S. 1972 . Testimony validity as a function of question form, atmosphere and item difficulty . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 2 : 167 – 186 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall , J. , Marquis , K.H. and Oskamp , S. 1971 . Effects of kind of question and atmosphere interrogation on accuracy and completeness of testimony . Harvard Law Review , 84 : 1620 – 1643 .
   Google Scholar
• Marshall , L.M. and Smith , A. 1986 . The effects of demand characteristics, evaluation anxiety, and expectancy on juror honesty during voir dire . Journal of Psychology , 120 : 205 – 217 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlon , R.J. 1988 . Communication in the legal process. , Philadelphia, PA : Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. .
   Google Scholar
• Mauet , T.A. 1980 . Fundamentals of trial techniques. , Boston : Little, Brown. .
   Google Scholar
• McCarter , W.D. and Potter , S.J. 1990 . Voir dire and jury selection in civil cases . Journal of the Missouri Bar , 46 (4) : 343 – 353 .
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey , J.C. , Jensen , T. and Todd , C. 1972 . The generalizability of source credibility scales for public figures. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention . December 1972 , Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry , M.R. Jr. 1984 . Do‐it‐yourself voir dire . Litigation , 70 (1) : 38 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• McGuire , W.J. 1961 . Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 63 : 326 – 332 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middendorf , K. and Luginbuhl , J. 1995 . The value of a nondirective voir dire style in jury selection . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 22 : 129 – 151 .
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Continuing Legal Education . 1997 . How to conduct effective , June 26 voir dire (7 day) [On‐line]. Available: http://www.minncle.org/inhs 1–15.htm
   Google Scholar
• Moran , G. , Cutler , B.L. and Loftus , E.F. 1990 . Jury selection in major controlled substance trials: The need for extended voir dire . Forensic Reports , 3 : 331 – 348 .
   Google Scholar
• Morrill , A.E. 1972 . Trial diplomacy. , Chicago : Court Practice Institute. .
   Google Scholar
• Narby , D. J. and Cutler , B.L. 1994 . Effectiveness of voir dire as a safeguard in eyewitness cases . Journal of Applied Psychology , 79 : 724 – 729 .
   Google Scholar
• Nietzel , M.T. and Dillehay , R.C. 1982 . The effects of variations in voir dire procedures in capital murder trials . Law and Human Behavior , 6 : 1 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Nietzel , M.T. and Dillehay , R.C. 1987 . The effects of voir dire variations in capital trials: A replication and extension . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 5 : 467 – 477 .
   Google Scholar
• Pace University School of Law Battered Women's Justice Center . 1997 . Voir dire questions , June 26 [On‐line]. Available: http://orion.law.pace.edu/bwjc/save/voirdir2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Reinard , J.C. 1981 . Effects of inadmissible testimony on jury verdicts: Phase four in a program of legal communication. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention . February 1981 , Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Reinard , J.C. 1998 . Introduction to communication research , (2nd ed.) , Boston : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Reinard , J.C. , Arsenault , D. J. and Geek , S. 1998 . Models of the influence of strategic voir dire questions on jury decision making. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention . February 1998 , Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Rieke , R.D. and Stutman , R.K. 1990 . Communication in legal advocacy. , Columbia, SC : University of South Carolina Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , M. 1987 . Trial psychology: Communication and persuasion in the courtroom. , Austin, TX : Butterworth Legal Publishers. .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal , R. and Rubin , D.B. 1982 . A simple, general purpose of display of the magnitude of experimental effect . Journal of Educational Psychology , 74 : 166 – 169 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford , S. 1987 . The nature of discourse in the courtroom: The complete rape trial. , 48 – 9A . 2460 Indiana University . Doctoral Diss. DAI
   Google Scholar
• Shuy , R.W. 1995 . How a judge's voir dire can teach a jury what to say . Discourse and Society , 6 : 207 – 222 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , M. 1994 . Evaluation of the effects of proposition 115 on voir dire practices in the criminal justice system. , 33 – 03 . 769 California State University . Masters Thesis, Fullerton (MAI:
   Google Scholar
• Starr , V.H. , ed. 1993 . Jury selection, sample voir dire questions: Proven and effective examples for the trial lawyer. , Boston : Little, Brown .
   Google Scholar
• Stasser , H. , Kerr , N. and Bray , R. 1982 . “ The social psychology of jury deliberations: Structure, process and outcomes ” . In The psychology of the courtroom. , Edited by: Kerr , N.C. and Bray , R.M. New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Suggs , D.L. and Sales , B.D. 1978a . The art and science of conducting the voir dire . Professional Psychology , 9 : 367 – 388 .
   Google Scholar
• Suggs , D.L. and Sales , B.D. 1978b . Juror self‐disclosure in the voir dire: A social science analysis . Indiana Law Review , 55 : 245 – 271 .
   Google Scholar
• Suggs , D.L. and Sales , B.D. 1978c . Using communication cues to evaluate potential jurors during voir dire . Arizona Law Review , 20 : 629 – 642 .
   Google Scholar
• Swann , W.B. , Guiliano , T. and Wegner , D.M. 1982 . Where leading questions can lead: The power of conjecture in social interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Personality , 42 : 1025 – 1035 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanford , A. 1983 . The trial process: Law, tactics and ethics. , Charlottesville, VA : Michie. .
   Google Scholar
• Tate , E. , Hawrish , E. and Clark , S. 1974 . Communication variables injury selection . Journal of Communication , 24 (3) : 130 – 139 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1997 . Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Continuing Legal Education . TACDL CLE topics: Jury selection , June 26 [On‐line]. Available: http://www.tncrimlaw.com/tacdl/resource/list/t26.htm
   Google Scholar
• Turley , W. 1982 . Voir dire: Preparation and execution . Litigation , 8 (2) : 19 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Wells , R.V. 1986 . A structure for successful trial technique: The plaintiff's case. , 48 – 2A . 252 University of Kansas . Doctoral dissertation, (DAI:
   Google Scholar
• Wigley , C.J. III. 1986 . Communication variables as predictors of decisions in the voir dire process. , 48 – 03A . 514 Kent State University . Doctoral Dissertation, (DAI
   Google Scholar
• Zeisel , H. and Diamond , S.S. 1978 . The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal district court . Stanford Law Review , 30 : 491 – 531 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar