933
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examining Functional Communication as Egocentric or Group-Centric: Application of a Latent Group Model

Pages 463-485 | Received 07 Dec 2010, Accepted 05 Apr 2011, Published online: 21 Oct 2011

References

  • Auld , F. Jr. , & White , A. M. 1956 . Rules for dividing interviews into sentences . Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied , 42 , 273 – 281 . doi: doi:10.1080/00223980.1956.9713040
  • Austin , J. 1962 . How to do things with words , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
  • Axley , S. R. 1984 . Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor . Academy of Management Review , 9 ( 3 ), 428 . doi: doi:10.2307/258283
  • Berliner , P. 1994 . Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation , Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
  • Bonito , J. A. 2007 . A local model of information sharing in small groups . Communication Theory , 17 ( 3 ), 252 – 280 . doi: doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00295.x
  • Bonito , J. A. , DeCamp , M. H. , & Ruppel , E. K. 2008 . The process of information sharing in small groups: Application of a local model Communication Monographs , 75 ( 2 ), 136 – 157 . doi: doi:10.1080/03637750802082078
  • Bonito , J. A. and Hollingshead , A. B. 1997 . “ Participation in small groups ” . In Communication yearbook 20 , Edited by: Burleson , B. R. 227 – 261 . Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
  • Bonito , J. A. , Ruppel , E. K. , & DeCamp , M. H. 2011 . An application of the socio egocentric model to information-sharing discussions: In search of group-level communication influences . Communication Research, 38, 356–375 .
  • Bonito , J. A. , & Sanders , R. E. 2009 . A different approach to answering a good question: A response to Hewes's models of communication effects on small group outcomes . Human Communication Research , 35 ( 2 ), 296 – 303 . doi: doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01351.x
  • Brown , P. and Levinson , S. C. 1987 . Politeness: Some universals in language usage , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
  • Burnett , A. and Badzinski , D. M. 2000 . An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision-making process . Communication Quarterly , 48 : 380 – 396 .
  • Campbell , D. T. , & Fiske , D. W. 1959 . Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix . Psychological Bulletin , 56 , 81 – 105 . doi: doi:10.1037/h0046016
  • Corman , S. R. , & Kuhn , T. 2005 . The detectability of socio-egocentric group speech: A quasi-Turing test . Communication Monographs , 72 , 117 – 143 . doi: doi:10.1080/03637750500111849
  • Gonzalez , R. , & Griffin , D. 1999 . The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case . Personal Relationships , 6 , 449 – 469 . doi: doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00203.x
  • Gonzalez , R. , & Griffin , D. 2002 . Modeling the personality of dyads and groups . Journal of Personality , 70 ( 6 ), 901 – 924 . doi: doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05027
  • Gouran , D. S. , & Hirokawa , R. Y. ( 1996 ). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view . In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole Communication and group decision making (pp. 55 – 80 ). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
  • Gouran , D. S. , Hirokawa , R. Y. , Julian , K. M. , & Leatham , G. B. 1993 . The evolution and current status of the functional perspective on communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups . In J. Anderson Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 573 – 600 ). Newbury Park, CA : Sage .
  • Grice , H. P. 1975 . Logic and conversation . In P. C. Morgan Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41 – 58 ). New York, NY : Academic Press .
  • Hewes , D. E. 1986 . A socio-egocentric model of group decision-making . In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole Communication and group decision-making (pp. 265 – 291 ). Beverly Hills, CA : Sage .
  • Hewes , D. E. 1996 . Small group communication may not influence decision making: An amplification of socio-egocentric theory . In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 179 – 212 ). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
  • Hewes , D. E. 2009 . The influence of communication processes on group outcomes: Antithesis and thesis . Human Communication Research , 35 ( 2 ), 249 – 271 . doi: doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01347.x
  • Hinsz , V. B. , Tindale , R. S. , & Vollrath , D. A. 1997 . The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors . Psychological Bulletin , 121 ( 1 ), 43 – 64 . doi: doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
  • Hirokawa , R. Y. 1982a . Consensus group decision-making, quality of decision, and group satisfaction: An attempt to sort “fact” from “fiction.” . Central States Speech Journal , 33 : 407 – 415 .
  • Hirokawa , R. Y. ( 1982b ). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings . Communication Quarterly , 30 ( 2 ), 134 – 141 .
  • Hirokawa , R. Y. 1990 . The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy: A task-contingency perspective . Small Group Research , 21 ( 2 ) : 190 – 204 .
  • Hirokawa , R. Y. , & Pace , R. 1983 . A descriptive investigation of the possible communication-based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making . Communication Monographs , 50 ( 4 ), 363 – 379 . doi: doi:10.1080/03637758309390175
  • Hirokawa , R. Y. , & Salazar , A. J. 1999 . Task-group communication and decision-making performance . In L. R. Frey The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 167 – 191 ). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
  • Hoffman , L. R. , & Kleinman , G. B. 1994 . Individual and group in group problem solving: The valence model redressed . Human Communication Research , 21 , 36 – 59 . doi: doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00338.x
  • Hollenbeck , J. R. , Ilgen , D. R. , LePine , J. A. , Colquitt , J. A. , & Hedlund , J. 1998 . Extending the multilevel theory of team decision making: Effects of feedback and experience in hierarchical teams . Academy of Management Review , 41 ( 3 ), 269 – 282 . doi: doi:10.2307/256907
  • Hollenbeck , J. R. , Ilgen , D. R. , Sego , D. J. , Hedlund , J. , Major , D. A. , & Phillips , J. 1995 . Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise . Journal of Applied Psychology , 80 ( 2 ), 292 – 316 . doi: doi:10.1037//0021-9010.80.2.292
  • Hollingshead , A. B. , Wittenbaum , G. M. , Paulus , P. B. , Hirokawa , R. Y. , Ancona , D. G. , Peterson , R. S. , et al. 2005 . A look at groups from the functional perspective . In M. S. Poole & A. B. Hollingshead Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 21 – 62 ). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
  • Kenny , D. A. , & La Voie , L. 1985 . Separating individual and group effects . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 48 ( 2 ), 339 – 348 . doi: doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339
  • Kivlighan , J. 2007 . Where is the relationship in research on the alliance? Two methods for analyzing dyadic data . Journal of Counseling Psychology , 54 ( 4 ), 423 – 433 . doi: doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.4.423
  • Larson , J. R. , Foster-Fishman , P. G. , & Keys , C. B. 1994 . Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67 ( 3 ), 446 – 461 . doi: doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.446
  • Levinson , S. C. 1981 . Some pre-observations on the modelling of dialogue . Discourse Processes , 4 , 93 – 116 . doi: doi:10.1080/01638538109544510
  • Meyers , R. A. , & Brashers , D. E. 1998 . Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link . Communication Monographs , 65 , 261 – 281 . doi: doi:10.1080/03637759809376454
  • Meyers , R. A. , Seibold , D. R. and Brashers , D. E. 1991 . Argument in initial group decision-making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55 ( 1 ) : 47 – 68 .
  • Miller , A. , & Murdock , T. 2007 . Modeling latent true scores to determine the utility of aggregate student perceptions as classroom indicators in HLM: The case of classroom goal structures . Contemporary Educational Psychology , 32 ( 1 ), 83 – 104 . doi: doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.006
  • Parker , K. C. 1988 . Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54 ( 6 ), 965 – 971 . doi: doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.965
  • Pavitt , C. 1993 . Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions . Communication Studies , 44 : 216 – 227 .
  • Pavitt , C. 1994 . Theoretical commitments presupposed by functional approaches to group discussion . Small Group Research , 25 , 520 – 541 . doi: doi:10.1177/1046496494254006
  • Pavitt , C. , & Johnson , K. K. 1999 . An examination of the coherence of group discussions . Communication Research , 26 ( 3 ), 303 – 321 . doi: doi:10.1177/009365099026003002
  • Piaget , J. 1926 . The language and thought of the child , New York, NY : Harcourt, Brace .
  • Poole , M. S. 1998 . The small group should be the fundamental unit of communication research . In J. S. Trent Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century (pp. 94 – 97 ). Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon .
  • Sanders , R. E. 1987 . Cognitive foundations of calculated speech , Albany, NY : SUNY Press .
  • Sanders , R. E. 1989 . Message effects via induced changes in the social meaning of a response . In J. Bradac Message effects in communication science (pp. 165 – 194 ). London, , UK : Sage .
  • Sanders , R. E. 1997 . The production of symbolic objects as components of larger wholes . In J. O. Greene Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 245 – 278 ). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc .
  • Sanders , R. E. , & Bonito , J. A. 2010 . Speaking for the institution: A fourth production site for group members’ influence attempts . Small Group Research , 41 ( 4 ), 427 – 451 . doi: doi:10.1177/1046496410366309
  • Sawyer , R. K. 2006 . Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration . Psychology of Music , 34 ( 2 ), 148 – 165 . doi: doi:10.1177/0305735606061850
  • Searle , J. R. 1969 . Speech acts , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
  • Stasser , G. 1998 . A primer of social decision scheme theory: Models of group influence, competitive model-testing, and prospective modeling . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 80 ( 1 ), 3 – 20 . doi: doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2851
  • Stasser , G. , & Taylor , L. A. 1991 . Speaking turns in face-to-face discussion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 60 ( 5 ), 675 – 684 . doi: doi:10.1037//0022-3514.60.5.675
  • Stasser , G. , & Titus , W. 2003 . Hidden profiles: A brief history . Psychological Inquiry , 14 ( 3 ), 304 – 313 . doi: doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_21
  • Watzlawick , P. , Beavin , J. and Jackson , D. 1967 . Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes , New York, NY : Norton .
  • Weingart , L. R. , Brett , J. M. , Olekalns , M. , & Smith , P. L. 2007 . Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 93 ( 6 ), 994 – 1010 . doi: doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.994
  • Wittenbaum , G. M. , Hollingshead , A. B. , & Botero , I. C. 2004 . From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm . Communication Monographs , 71 ( 3 ), 286 – 310 . doi: doi:10.1080/0363452042000299894
  • Wittenbaum , G. M. , Hollingshead , A. B. , Paulus , P. B. , Hirokawa , R. Y. , Ancona , D. G. , & Peterson , R. S. 2004 . The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups . Small Group Research , 35 , 17 – 43 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.