The Door-in-the-Face Persuasive Message Strategy: A Meta-Analysis of the First 35 Years

References

• Abrahams , M. F. and Bell , R. A. 1994 . Encouraging charitable contributions: An examination of three models of Door-in-the-Face compliance . Communication Research , 21 ( 2 ) : 131 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloe , A. M. , Becker , B. J. and Pigott , T. 2010 . An alternative to R2 for assessing linear models of effect size . Research Synthesis Methods , 1 : 272 – 283 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anker , A. E. , Reinhart , A. M. and Feeley , T. H. 2010 . Meta-analysis of meta-analyses in communication: Comparing fixed- and random-effects models . Communication Quarterly , 58 ( 3 ) : 1 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Bandura , A. 1977 . Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change . Psychological Review , 84 : 191 – 215 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell , R. A. , Abrahams , M. F. , Clark , C. L. and Schlatter , C. 1996 . The Door-in-the-Face compliance strategy: An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context . Communication Quarterly , 44 ( 1 ) : 107 – 124 .
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz , L. and Daniels , L. R. 1963 . Responsibility and dependency . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 66 : 429 – 436 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm , J. W. 1966 . A theory of psychological reactance , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein , M. , Hedges , L. V. , Higgins , J. P. T. and Rothstein , H. R. 2009 . Introduction to meta-analysis , Chichester : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Brownstein , R. J. and Katzev , R. D. 1985 . The relative effectiveness of three compliance techniques in eliciting donations to a cultural organization . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 15 ( 6 ) : 564 – 574 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger , J. M. 1986 . Increasing compliance by improving the deal: The That's-Not-All technique . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51 ( 2 ) : 277 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann , A. , Sherman , S. J. and Elkes , R. 1975 . Effects of initial request size and timing of a second request on compliance: The Foot in the Door and the Door in the Face . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 32 ( 5 ) : 774 – 782 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrill , J. G. 1985 . Testing two cognitive explanations for sequential request efficacy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1985) . Dissertation Abstracts International , 46 : 3191A
   Google Scholar
• Carter-Sowell , A. R. , Chen , Z. and Williams , K. D. 2008 . Ostracism increases social susceptibility . Social Influence , 3 ( 3 ) : 143 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. and Ascani , K. 1976 . Test of a concession procedure for inducing verbal, behavioral, and further compliance with a request to give blood . Journal of Applied Psychology , 61 ( 3 ) : 295 – 300 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini , R. B. , Vincent , J. E. , Lewis , S. K. , Catalan , J. , Wheeler , D. and Darby , B. L. 1975 . Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The Door-in-the-Face technique . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31 ( 2 ) : 206 – 215 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins , B. , & Brady , R. M. 1994 , November . Anchoring effects in the door-in-the-face technique . Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association . New Orleans , LA .
   Google Scholar
• Conner , A. E. 2005 . A general framework for modifying health-relevant behavior: Reducing undergraduate binge drinking by appealing to commitment and reciprocity . (Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University, 2005) . Dissertation Abstracts International , 66 , AAT 3172333 .
   Google Scholar
• Cooper , H. , Hedges , L. V. and Valentine , J. 2009 . The handbook of research synthesis , New York : Russell Sage Foundation .
   Google Scholar
• Crano , W. D. and Sivacek , J. 1982 . Social reinforcement, self-attribution, and the Foot-in-the-Door phenomenon . Social Cognition , 1 ( 2 ) : 110 – 125 .
   Google Scholar
• Dillard , J. P. and Hale , J. L. 1992 . Prosocialness and sequential request compliance techniques: Limits to the Foot-in-the-Door and the Door-in-the-Face? . Communication Studies , 43 : 220 – 232 .
   Google Scholar
• Dillard , J. P. , Hunter , J. E. and Burgoon , M. 1984 . Sequential-request strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face . Human Communication Research , 10 : 461 – 488 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick , P. W. and Gardner , W. L. 2009 . Is it a game? Evidence for social influence in the virtual world . Social Influence , 4 ( 1 ) : 18 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebster , C. and Neumayr , B. 2008 . Applying the door-in-the-face compliance technique to retailing . The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , 18 ( 1 ) : 121 – 128 .
   Google Scholar
• Even-Chen , M. , Yinon , Y. and Bizman , A. 1978 . The door in the face technique: Effects of the size of the initial request . European Journal of Social Psychology , 8 : 135 – 140 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley , T. H. 1999 , November . A meta-analysis if the ceiling effects in the door-in-the-face influence strategy . Paper presented to National Communication Association Convention . Chicago .
   Google Scholar
• Fern , E. F. , Monroe , K. B. and Avila , R. A. 1986 . Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results . Journal of Marketing Research , 23 : 144 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fointiat , V. 2000 . “Foot-in-the-Mouth” versus “Door-in-the-Face” requests . The Journal of Social Psychology , 140 ( 2 ) : 264 – 266 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss , R. D. and Dempsey , C. B. 1979 . Blood donation and the Foot-in-the-Door technique: A limiting case . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 ( 4 ) : 580 – 590 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman , M. 1986 . Compliance employing a combined Foot-in-the-Door and Door-in-the-Face procedure . The Journal of Social Psychology , 126 ( 1 ) : 111 – 116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman , M. and Creason , C. R. 1981 . Inducing compliance by a two-Door-in-the-Face procedure and a self-determination request . The Journal of Social Psychology , 114 : 229 – 235 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman , M. , McVeigh , J. F. and Richterkessing , J. L. 1984 . Door-in-the-Face procedure: Reciprocal concession, perceptual contrast, or worthy person . The Journal of Social Psychology , 123 : 245 – 251 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner , A. W. 1960 . The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement . American Sociological Review , 25 ( 2 ) : 161 – 178 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace , C. R. , Bell , P. A. and Sugar , J. 1988 . Effects of compliance techniques on spontaneous and asked-for helping . The Journal of Social Psychology , 128 ( 4 ) : 525 – 532 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéguen , N. 2003 . Fund-raising on the Web: The effect of an electronic Door-in-the-Face technique on compliance to a request . CyberPsychology & Behavior , 6 ( 2 ) : 189 – 193 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hale , J. L. and Laliker , M. 1999 . Explaining the Door-in-the-Face: Is it really time to abandon reciprocal concessions? . Communication Studies , 50 : 203 – 210 .
   Google Scholar
• Harari , H. , Mohr , D. and Hosey , K. 1980 . Faculty helpfulness to students: A comparison of compliance techniques . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 6 ( 3 ) : 373 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes , T. J. , Dwyer , F. R. , Greenwalt , T. J. and Coe , N. A. 1984 . A comparison of two behavioral influence techniques for improving blood donor recruitment . Transfusion , 24 : 399 – 403 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges , L. V. and Olkin , I. 1985 . Statistical methods for meta-analysis , Orlando , FL : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hedges , L. V. and Vevea , J. L. 1998 . Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis . Psychological Methods , 3 ( 4 ) : 486 – 504 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins , J. P. T. , Thompson , S. G. , Deeks , J. J. and Altman , D. G. 2003 . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses . British Medical Journal , 327 : 557 – 560 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins , M. A. 2003 . Persuasion, pitch and presentation: The effects of information style on individual decision making . (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, 2003) . Dissertation Abstracts International , 64 , AAT 3108908 .
   Google Scholar
• Hunter , J. E. , Schmidt , F. L. and Jackson , G. B. 1982 . Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies , Beverly Hills , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Katzev , R. and Brownstein , R. 1989 . The influence of enlightenment on compliance . The Journal of Social Psychology , 129 ( 3 ) : 335 – 347 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer , E. , Blank , A. and Chanowitz , B. 1978 . The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 36 : 635 – 642 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCat , B. , Hilton , D. J. and Crano , W. D. 2009 . Group status and reciprocity norms: Can the Door-in-the-Face effect be obtained in an out-group context? . Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice , 13 ( 3 ) : 178 – 189 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey , L. L. M. 2005 . Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation: An examination of appeals to help unknown others through bone marrow donation . Human Communication Research , 31 : 453 – 481 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey , M. W. and Wilson , D. B. 2001 . Practical meta-analysis , Newbury Park , CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Martens , B. K. , Kelly , S. Q. and Diskin , M. T. 1996 . The effects of two sequential-request strategies on teachers' acceptability and use of a classroom intervention . Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation , 7 ( 3 ) : 211 – 221 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar , M. G. 2001 . Promoting health behaviours with door-in-the-face: The influence of the beneficiary of the request . Psychology, Health, & Medicine , 6 ( 2 ) : 115 – 119 .
   Google Scholar
• Millar , M. G. 2002a . The effectiveness of the Door-in-the-Face compliance strategy on friends and strangers . The Journal of Social Psychology , 142 ( 3 ) : 295 – 304 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar , M. G. 2002b . Effects of a guilt induction and guilt reduction on Door in the Face . Communication Research , 29 ( 6 ) : 666 – 680 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , R. L. 1974 . Facilitating compliance by manipulating the nature of the comparison: Relative cost vs. reciprocal concession . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 1 ( 1 ) : 160 – 162 .
   Google Scholar
• Miller , R. L. , Seligman , C. , Clark , N. T. and Bush , M. 1976 . Perceptual contrast versus reciprocal concession as mediators of induced compliance . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science , 8 ( 4 ) : 401 – 409 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowen , J. C. and Cialdini , R. B. 1980 . On implementing the Door-in-the-Face compliance technique in a business context . Journal of Marketing Research , 17 : 253 – 258 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawrat , R. 1989 . Czy mozna manipulowac przechodniami na polskiej ulicy? Empiryczne badanie efektywnosci wybranych sekwencyjnych procedur zwiekszania uleglosci [Is it possible to manipulate passers-by in a Polish street? Empirical tests of effectiveness of selected sequential procedures of increasing submission] . Przeglad Psychologiczny , 32 : 205 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. 1999 . Three reasons for doubting the adequacy of the reciprocal-concessions explanation of Door-in-the-Face effects . Communication Studies , 50 ( 3 ) : 211 – 220 .
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Figgé , M. 1997 . A guilt-based explanation of the door-in-the-face influence strategy . Human Communication Research , 24 : 64 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Figgé , M. 1999 . Guilt and expected guilt in the Door-in-the-Face technique . Communication Monographs , 66 : 312 – 324 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe , D. J. and Hale , S. L. 1998 . The Door-in-the-Face influence strategy: A random-effects meta-analytic review . Communication Yearbook , 21 : 1 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Oliver , D. F. 1984 . Understanding the “foot in the door” and the “door in the face” compliance techniques: A reinterpretation of the situation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1984) . Dissertation Abstracts International , 45 : 2735B
   Google Scholar
• Pascual , A. , Dagot , L. , Vallée , B. and Guéguen , N. 2009 . Soumission sans pression, médiatisation d'un tsunami et don d'argent: Efficacité comparée de la parte-au-nez et du << vous êtes libre de … >> [Compliance without pressure, mediatization of a Tsunami and charitable donation: Compared effectiveness of the door-in-the-face and “you are free of …” techniques . Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée , 59 : 79 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual , A. and Guéguen , N. 2006 . Door-in-the-Face technique and monetary solicitation: An evaluation in a field setting . Perceptual and Motor Skills , 103 : 974 – 978 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paska , M. 2002 . “I didn't mean it …”: The sequential techniques of social influence and unethical behaviour . Studia Psychologiczne , 40 ( 3 ) : 69 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Patch , M. E. 1986 . The role of source legitimacy in sequential request strategies of compliance . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 12 ( 2 ) : 199 – 205 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patch , M. E. 1988 . Differential perception of source legitimacy in sequential request strategies . The Journal of Social Psychology , 128 ( 6 ) : 817 – 823 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patch , M. E. , Hoang , V. R. and Stahelski , A. J. 1997 . The use of metacommunication in compliance: Door-in-the-Face and single-request strategies . The Journal of Social Psychology , 137 ( 1 ) : 88 – 94 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendleton , M. G. and Batson , C. D. 1979 . Self-presentation and the Door-in-the-Face technique for inducing compliance . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 5 ( 1 ) : 77 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves , R. A. , Baker , G. A. , Boyd , J. G. and Cialdini , R. B. 1991 . The Door-in-the-Face technique: Reciprocal concessions vs. self-presentational explanations . Journal of Social Behavior and Personality , 6 ( 3 ) : 545 – 558 .
   Google Scholar
• Reingen , P. H. 1978 . On inducing compliance with requests . Journal of Consumer Research , 5 : 96 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingen , P. H. and Kernan , J. B. 1979 . More evidence on interpersonal yielding . Journal of Marketing Research , 16 : 588 – 593 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart , A. M. , Marshall , H. M. , Feeley , T. H. and Tutzauer , F. 2007 . The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance . Communication Monographs , 74 : 229 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rind , B. and Kipnis , D. 1999 . Changes in self-perceptions as a result of successfully persuading others . Journal of Social Issues , 55 ( 1 ) : 141 – 156 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodafinos , A. , Vucevic , A. and Sideridis , G. D. 2005 . The effectiveness of compliance techniques: Foot in the Door versus Door in the Face . The Journal of Social Psychology , 145 ( 2 ) : 237 – 239 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers , C. M. 1977 . The door-in-the-face effect: Concessional reciprocity or dissonance reduction? (Doctoral dissertation, Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University, 1976) . Dissertation Abstracts International , 38 : 2437B
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein , H. R. , Sutton , A. J. , & Borenstein , M. 2005 . Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments . Chicester , , UK : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz , S. H. 1973 . Normative explanations for helping behaviors: A critique, proposal, and empirical test . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 9 : 349 – 364 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzwald , J. , Raz , M. and Zvibel , M. 1979 . The applicability of the Door-in-the-Face technique when established behavioral customs exist . Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 9 ( 6 ) : 576 – 586 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénémeaud , C. , Somat , A. , Terrier , L. and Noel , Y. 2008 . Door-in-the-Face and preference for consistency: When the high preference for consistency subjects don't manifest an established influence effect . Annee Psychologique , 108 ( 1 ) : 51 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanab , M. E. and Isonio , S. A. 1980 . The effects of delay upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the door-in-the-face paradigm . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 15 ( 2 ) : 76 – 78 .
   Google Scholar
• Shanab , M. E. and O'Neill , P. 1979 . The effects of contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the door-in-the-face paradigm . Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science , 11 ( 3 ) : 236 – 244 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanab , M. E. and O'Neill , P. J. 1982 . The effects of self-perception and perceptual contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests . Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society , 19 ( 5 ) : 279 – 281 .
   Google Scholar
• Snyder , M. and Cunningham , M. R. 1975 . To comply or not comply: Testing the self-perception explanation of the “Foot-in-the-Door” phenomenon . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31 ( 1 ) : 64 – 67 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiewak , S. 2002 . Cognitive depletion and the effectiveness of the door-in-the-face and the fear-then-relief compliance techniques . Studia Psychologiczne , 40 ( 3 ) : 23 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Turner , M. M. , Tamborini , R. , Limon , M. S. and Zuckerman-Hyman , C. 2007 . The moderators and mediators of Door-in-the-Face requests: Is it a negotiation or a helping experience? . Communication Monographs , 74 ( 3 ) : 333 – 356 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusing , K. J. and Dillard , J. P. 2000 . The psychological reality of the Door-in-the-Face: It's helping, not bargaining . Journal of Language and Social Psychology , 19 ( 1 ) : 5 – 25 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tybout , A. M. 1978 . Relative effectiveness of the three behavioral influence strategies as supplements to persuasion in a marketing context . Journal of Marketing Research , 15 : 229 – 242 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tybout , A. M. , Sternthal , B. and Calder , B. J. 1983 . Information availability as a determinant of multiple request effectiveness . Journal of Marketing Research , 20 : 280 – 290 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uehara , E. S. 1995 . Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner's “moral norm of reciprocity” and social support . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 12 : 483 – 502 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer , W. 2010 . Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metaphor package . Journal of Statistical Software , 36 . http://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/paper. Accessed online March 23, 2011 .
   Google Scholar
• Wang , T. , Brownstein , R. and Katzev , R. 1989 . Promoting charitable behaviour with compliance techniques . Applied Psychology: An International Review , 38 ( 2 ) : 165 – 183 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , K. D. and Williams , K. B. 1989 . Impact of source strength on two compliance techniques . Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 10 ( 2 ) : 149 – 159 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi , Y. 2008 . The door-in-the-face technique after eating: A field experiment on the self-regulatory function of affect as a resource . Japanese Journal of Psychology , 79 ( 3 ) : 232 – 240 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar