An idealized self or the real me? Predicting attraction to online dating profiles using selective self-presentation and warranting

References

• Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1969). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, A. C., Vonk, R., & van Knippenberg, A. (2009). The source effect: Person descriptions by self versus others have differential effects on impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 965–977. doi:10.1177/0146167209335056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 341–345. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2010). Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: A comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3, 402–420. doi:10.1080/17544750.2010.516575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. C. (2014). Advancing warranting theory. Communication Theory, 24, 186–204. doi:10.1111/comt.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath, J. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donn, J., & Sherman, R. (2002). Attitudes and practices regarding the formation of romantic relationships on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 107–123. doi:10.1089/109493102753770499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duthler, K. W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 500–521. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2011). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media and Society, 14, 45–62. doi:10.1177/1461444811410395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Heino, R. D., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, E. L., Cai, D. A., Kaplowitz, S. A., Chung, S., Van Dyke, M. A., & Kim, J. N. (2003). The semantics of social influence: Threats vs. persuasion. Communication Monographs, 70, 295–316. doi:10.1080/0363775032000179115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 523–548. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152–177. doi:10.1177/0093650205285368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C. H. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38, 70–100. doi:10.1177/0093650210377091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Style, C. B. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(2), 122–131. doi: 10.2307/2136639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of race for initiating a romantic relationship. Howard Journal of Communications, 11(1), 49–64. doi:10.1080/106461700246715
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and continual process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1983). Liking, loving and relating. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37, 58–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1992). Common-sense psychology and scientific psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41(3), 261–266. doi:10.1080/03637757409375845
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. C., Cooke, L., Tsang, J., & Morgan, F. (1992). Should I brag? Nature and impact of positive and boastful disclosures for women and men. Human Communication Research, 18, 364–399. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00557.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. L., & Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1999). Self-monitoring, trust, and commitment in romantic relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(2), 215–220. doi:10.1080/00224549909598375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W. B. (1974). Trust in interpersonal communication. Speech Monographs, 41(3), 236–244. doi:10.1080/03637757409375842
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Jr, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287–310. doi:10.1080/03637750701543493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 419–435. doi:10.1177/0146167200266002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robnett, B., & Feliciano, C. (2011). Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Journal of Consumer Research, 89, 807–828. doi:10.1093/sf/89.3.807
   Google Scholar
• Rudder, C. (2015). Dataclysm: Love, sex, race, and identity – What our online lives tell us about our offline selves. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Online dating and relationships. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Online20DATING202013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A. R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335–351. doi:10.1177/0093650209356437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. R. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. doi:10.1177/0146167208318067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one’s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 314–335. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Heide, B., D’Angelo, J. D., & Schumaker, E. M. (2012). The effects of verbal versus photographic self-presentation on impression formation in Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62, 98–116. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channels effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473–501. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253. doi:10.1177/0093650208330251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Tong, S. T., Carr, C. T., & Atkin, C. K. (2010). Effects of interpersonal goals on inadvertent intrapersonal influence in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 36, 323–347. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, D., Woodworth, M., Hancock, J. T., & Cormier, N. (2010). Warrants and deception in computer mediated communication. In K. Inkpen & C. Gutwin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 9–12). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3, 250–257. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. (2008). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an Internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 942. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar