1,136
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Taking messages into the magnet: Method–theory synergy in communication neuroscience

, , &
Pages 81-102 | Received 02 Apr 2017, Accepted 28 Sep 2017, Published online: 01 Nov 2017

References

  • Amir, O., Huskey, R., Mangus, J. M., Swanson, R., Gordon, A., Khooshabeh, P., & Weber, R. (2017). Trump vs. Clinton: The role of moral intuition networks in processing political attack advertisements. Paper Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the Social and Affective Neuroscience Society, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Ashby, F. G. (2011). Statistical analysis of fMRI data. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017). Network neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 353–364. doi: 10.1038/nn.4502
  • Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2015). Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters-Kluwer.
  • Berkman, E. T., & Falk, E. B. (2013). Beyond brain mapping: Using neural measures to predict real-world outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 45–50. doi: 10.1177/0963721412469394
  • Brennan, J., Nir, Y., Hasson, U., Malach, R., Heeger, D. J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2012). Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening. Brain and Language, 120(2), 163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.002
  • Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Honey, C. J., Yong, C. H., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2016). Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals. Nature Neuroscience, 20(1), 115–125. doi: 10.1038/nn.4450
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
  • Cohen, S. S., Henin, S., & Parra, L. C. (2017). Engaging narratives evoke similar neural activity and lead to similar time perception. bioRxiv, 1–16. doi: 10.1101/104778
  • Coltheart, M. (2013). How can functional neuroimaging inform cognitive theories? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 98–103. doi: 10.1177/1745691612469208
  • Cooper, N., Bassett, D. S., & Falk, E. B. (2017). Coherent activity between brain regions that code for value is linked to the malleability of human behavior. Scientific Reports, 7, 43250. doi: 10.1038/srep43250
  • Craighead, B., & Weber, R. (2016). Rewards and punishments in video games: A quantitative content analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), Fukuoka.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). Berlin: Springer.
  • De Martino, F., Valente, G., Staeren, N., Ashburner, J., Goebel, R., & Formisano, E. (2008). Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns. Neuroimage, 43(1), 44–58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.037
  • Dikker, S., Silbert, L. J., Hasson, U., & Zevin, J. D. (2014). On the same wavelength: Predictable language enhances speaker-listener brain-to-brain synchrony in posterior superior temporal gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(18), 6267–6272. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3796-13.2014
  • Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., & Duncan, J. (1980). An activation model of information exposure. Communication Monographs, 47(4), 295–303. doi: 10.1080/03637758009376038
  • Edelman, R. R., & Warach, S. (1993). Magnetic resonance imaging. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 708–716. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199303113281008
  • Etzel, J. A., Zacks, J. M., & Braver, T. S. (2013). Searchlight analysis: Promise, pitfalls, and potential. NeuroImage, 78, 261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.041
  • Falk, E. B., & Bassett, D. S. (2017). Brain and social networks: Fundamental building blocks of human experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(9), 674–690. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.009
  • Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). From neural responses to population behavior: Neural focus group predicts population level media effects. Psychological Science, 23, 439–445. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434964
  • Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Mann, T., Harrison, B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Predicting persuasion-induced behavior change from the brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8421–8424. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0063-10.2010
  • Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Whalen, D., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). Neural activity during health messaging predicts reductions in smoking above and beyond self-report. Health Psychology, 30, 177–185. doi: 10.1037/a0022259
  • Falk, E. B., Hyde, L. W., Mitchell, C., Faul, J., Gonzalez, R., Heitzeg, M. M., … Schulenberg, J. (2013). What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(44), 17615–17622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310134110
  • Falk, E. B., O’Donnell, M. B., Tompson, S., Gonzalez, R., Dal Cin, S., Strecher, V., …  An, L. (2016). Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 204–214. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv108
  • Fisher, J., Huskey, R., Keene, J., & Weber, R. (2017). The offramp problem: Treating media psychology as an insular discipline inhibits theoretical and empirical progress. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
  • Frick, A., Gingnell, M., Marquand, A. F., Howner, K., Fischer, H., Kristiansson, M., … Furmark, T. (2014). Classifying social anxiety disorder using multivoxel pattern analyses of brain function and structure. Behavioural Brain Research, 259, 330–335. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.003
  • Friedman, J. H. (1997). On bias, variance, 0/1 – loss, and the curse-of-dimensionality. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1), 55–77. doi:10.1023/A:100977800 doi: 10.1023/A:1009778005914
  • Gabrieli, J. D. E., Ghosh, S. S., & Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. (2015). Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron, 85(1), 11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.047
  • Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108. doi: 10.1177/1745691611434210
  • Günther, E., & Quandt, T. (2016). Word counts and topic models. Automated text analysis methods for digital journalism research. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 75–88. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2015.1093270
  • Hasson, U., & Frith, C. D. (2016). Mirroring and beyond: Coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1693), 20150366–9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0366
  • Hasson, U., Landesman, O., Knappmeyer, B., Vallines, I., Rubin, N., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of film. Projections, 2(1), 1–26. doi: 10.3167/proj.2008.020102
  • Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634–1640. doi: 10.1126/science.1089506
  • Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293(5539), 2425–2430. doi: 10.1126/science.1063736
  • Hesse, C., Floyd, K., Rauscher, E. A., Frye-Cox, N., Hegarty, J., & Peng, H. (2013). Alexithymia and impairment of decoding positive affect: An fMRI study. Journal of Communication, 63, 786–806. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12039
  • Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2014). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
  • Huskey, R., Craighead, B., Miller, M. B., & Weber, R. (2017). Intrinsic reward motivates large-scale shifts between cognitive control and default mode networks during task performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Huskey, R., Mangus, J. M., & Weber, R. (2016). Multidimensional message features modulate functional connectivity in the persuasion network. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society (CNS), New York, NY.
  • Klasen, M., Weber, R., Kircher, T. T., Mathiak, K. A., & Mathiak, K. (2012). Neural contributions to flow experience during video game playing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(4), 485–495. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr021
  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., … Turner, R. (1992). Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(12), 5675–5679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675
  • Lang, A. (2009). The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. In R. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 1–12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lang, A. (2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory, 23(1), 10–24. doi: 10.1111/comt.12000
  • Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M., & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8(4), 369–394. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_3
  • Lang, A., & Ewoldsen, D. (2013). Beyond effects: Conceptualizing communication as dynamic, complex, nonlinear, and fundamental. In S. Allan (Ed.), Rethinking communication: Keywords in communication research (pp. 109–120). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
  • Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
  • Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869–878. doi: 10.1038/nature06976
  • Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412(6843), 150–157. doi: 10.1038/35084005
  • Mather, M., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 108–113. doi: 10.1177/1745691612469037
  • Mathiak, K., & Weber, R. (2006). Toward brain correlates of natural behavior: fMRI during violent video games. Human Brain Mapping, 27(12), 948–956. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20234
  • Mur, M., Bandettini, P. A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2009). Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI – an introductory guide. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 101–109. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn044
  • Murdaugh, D. L., Cox, J. E., Cook, E. W., III, & Weller, E. R. (2012). fMRI reactivity to high-calorie food pictures predicts short- and long-term outcome in a weight-loss program. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2709–2721. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.071
  • Naci, L., Monti, M. M., Cruse, D., Kübler, A., Sorger, B., Goebel, R., … Owen, A. M. (2012). Brain-computer interfaces for communication with nonresponsive patients. Annals of Neurology, 72(3), 312–323. doi: 10.1002/ana.23656
  • Naselaris, T., Kay, K. N., Nishimoto, S., & Gallant, J. L. (2011). Encoding and decoding in fMRI. NeuroImage, 56(2), 400–410. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.073
  • Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., Naselaris, T., Benjamini, Y., Yu, B., & Gallant, J. L. (2011). Reconstructing visual experiences from brain activity evoked by natural movies. Current Biology, 21(19), 1641–1646. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031
  • Norman, K. A., Polyn, S. M., Detre, G. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2006). Beyond mind-reading: Multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(9), 424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.005
  • O’Donnell, M. B., Bayer, J., Cascio, C. N., & Falk, E. B. (2017). Neural bases of recommendations differ according to social network structure. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw158
  • O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Big data under the microscope and brains in social context: Integrating methods from computational social science and neuroscience. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 274–289. doi: 10.1177/0002716215569446
  • Ogawa, S., Tank, D. W., Menon, R., Ellermann, J. M., Kim, S. G., Merkle, H., & Ugurbil, K. (1992). Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: Functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(13), 5951–5955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5951
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
  • Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(1), 67–70. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm006
  • Poldrack, R. A., Mumford, J. A., & Nichols, T. E. (2011). Handbook of functional MRI data analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. (2011). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
  • Raichle, M. E., & Mintun, M. A. (2006). Brain work and brain imaging. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 449–476. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112819
  • Ravaja, N. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6(2), 193–235. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_4
  • Rusconi, E., & Mitchener-Nissen, T. (2013). Prospects of functional magnetic resonance imaging as lie detector. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 594. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00594
  • Saxe, R., Brett, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2006). Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1088–1096. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.062
  • Schmälzle, R., Brook O’Donnell, M., Garcia, J. O., Cascio, C. N., Bayer, J., Bassett, D. S., … Falk, E. B. (2017). Brain connectivity dynamics during social interaction reflect social network structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(20), 5153–5158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616130114
  • Schmälzle, R., Häcker, F. E. K., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2015). Engaged listeners: Shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(8), 1137–1143. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu168
  • Schmälzle, R., Häcker, F., Renner, B., Honey, C. J., & Schupp, H. T. (2013). Neural correlates of risk perception during real-life risk communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(25), 10340–10347. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5323-12.2013
  • Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Kim, H. S., Cappella, J. N., & Falk, E. B. (2017). A neural model of valuation and information virality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(11), 2881–2886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615259114
  • Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 328–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00318.x
  • Slater, M. D. (2002). Involvement as goal-directed strategic processing: Extending the elaboration likelihood model. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 175–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Slater, M. D., & Gleason, L. S. (2012). Contributing to theory and knowledge in quantitative communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(4), 215–236. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2012.732626
  • Smith, K. (2012). fMRI 2.0. Functional magnetic resonance imaging is growing from showy adolescence into a workhorse of brain imaging. Nature, 484(7392), 24–26. doi: 10.1038/484024a
  • Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Decoding human brain activity during real-world experiences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 356–365. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.002
  • Sporns, O. (2010). Networks of the brain. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14425–14430. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008662107
  • Strother, S. C. (2006). Evaluating fMRI preprocessing pipelines. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 25(2), 27–41. doi: 10.1109/MEMB.2006.1607667
  • Suykens, J. A. K., & Vandewalle, J. (1999). Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 9(3), 293–300. doi:10.1023/A:101862860 doi: 10.1023/A:1018628609742
  • Vanderah, T., & Gould, D. (2015). Nolte’s the human brain: An introduction to its functional anatomy (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences.
  • Watts, D. J. (2017). Should social science be more solution-oriented? Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0015. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0015
  • Weber, R. (2015). Biology and brains – methodological innovations in communication science: Introduction to the special issue. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1–2), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2014.999755
  • Weber, R., Alicea, B., Huskey, R., & Mathiak, K. (2017). The dynamics of attention in virtual environments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Weber, R., Eden, A., Huskey, R., Mangus, J. M., & Falk, E. (2015). Bridging media psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Media Psychology, 27(3), 146–156. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000163
  • Weber, R., Eden, A., & Mathiak, K. (2011). Seeing bad people punished makes us think alike: Social norm violations in television drama elicit cortical synchronization in viewers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), Boston, MA.
  • Weber, R., & Huskey, R. (2013). Flow theory and media exposure: Advances in experimental manipulation and measurement. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, London.
  • Weber, R., Huskey, R., & Craighead, B. (2017). Flow experiences and well-being: A media neuroscience perspective. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being. International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 183–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Weber, R., Huskey, R., Mangus, J. M., Westcott-Baker, A., & Turner, B. O. (2015). Neural predictors of message effectiveness during counterarguing in antidrug campaigns. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 4–30. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.971414
  • Weber, R., Mangus, J. M., & Huskey, R. (2015). Brain imaging in communication research: A practical guide to understanding and evaluating fMRI studies. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1–2), 5–29. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2014.999754
  • Weber, R., Ritterfeld, U., & Mathiak, K. (2006). Does playing violent video games induce aggression? Empirical evidence of a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Media Psychology, 8(1), 39–60. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0801_4
  • Weber, R., Sherry, J., & Mathiak, K. (2009). The neurophysiological perspective in mass communication research. In Biological dimensions of communication: Perspectives, methods, and research (pp. 43–73). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
  • Weber, R., Tamborini, R., Westcott-Baker, A., & Kantor, B. (2009). Theorizing flow and media enjoyment as cognitive synchronization of attentional and reward networks. Communication Theory, 19(4), 397–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01352.x
  • Weber, R., Turner, B., Huskey, R., & Mangus, J. M. (2015). Individual differences in neural processing of persuasive messages: Implications for message tailoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society (CNS), San Francisco, CA.
  • Weber, R., Westcott-Baker, A., & Anderson, G. (2013). A multi-level analysis of anti-marijuana public service announcement effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 302–330. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2013.788254
  • Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411–426. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N
  • Wilson, S. M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., & Iacoboni, M. (2008). Beyond superior temporal cortex: Intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 18(1), 230–242. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm049
  • Yang, Z., Huang, Z., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Dai, R., Northoff, G., & Bandettini, P. (2014). Using fMRI to decode true thoughts independent of intention to conceal. NeuroImage, 99, 80–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.034
  • Yeshurun, Y., Swanson, S., Simony, E., Chen, J., Lazaridi, C., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2017). Same story, different story: The neural representation of interpretive frameworks. Psychological Science, 57, 1–13. doi: 10.1177/0956797616682029

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.