Mapping the terrain of person-centered supportive conversations

References

• Afifi, T. D., Afifi, W. A., Merrill, A. F., Denes, A., & Davis, S. (2013). “You need to stop talking about this!”: Verbal rumination and the costs of social support. Human Communication Research, 39, 395–421. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, J. L. (1980). Person- and position-centered teacher communication in a day care center: A case study triangulating interview and naturalistic methods. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction Vol 3 (pp. 59–96). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, F., Jr. & White, A. M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. The Journal of Psychology, 42, 273–281. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1956.9713040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D. (2013). The role of thinking in the comforting process: An empirical test of a dual-process framework. Communication Research, 40, 533–558. doi: 10.1177/0093650211427030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Burleson, B. R., & Jones, S. M. (2012). Explaining the relationships among message quality, message evaluations, and message outcomes: A dual-process approach. Communication Monographs, 79, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2011.646491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Jones, S. M., Vickery, A. J., Hatcher, L., & Cannava, K. (2014). Examining the construct validity of enacted support: A multitrait-multimethod analysis of three perspectives for judging immediacy and listening behaviors. Communication Monographs, 81, 495–523. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.957223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53(6), 1578–1588. doi: 10.2307/1130086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1987). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 305–349). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.2307/1130086.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2003). Emotional support skill. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551–594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Goldsmith, D. J. (1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245–280). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., Holmstrom, A. J., & Gilstrap, C. M. (2005). “Guys can’t say that to guys”: Four experiments assessing the normative motivation account for deficiencies in the emotional support provided by men. Communication Monographs, 72(4), 468–501. doi: 10.1080/03637750500322636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication 3rd ed. (pp. 374–424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1985). Consistencies in theoretical and naive evaluations of comforting messages. Communication Monographs, 52, 103–123. doi: 10.1080/03637758509376099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. A., Pierce, A. J., Finn, K., Hsu, K., Toosley, A., & Williams, L. (1998). The impact of alternative approaches to comforting, closeness of relationship, and gender on multiple measures of effectiveness. Communication Studies, 49, 224–239. doi: 10.1080/10510979809368533
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. F. (1981). Relational competence: Measurement and validation. Paper presented at the Western Speech Communication Association, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. S., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 271–302. doi: 10.1007/BF00993115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. J. (2004). Communicating social support. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, D. J., McDermott, V. M., & Alexander, S. C. (2000). Helpful, supportive, and sensitive: Measuring the evaluation of enacted support in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 369–391. doi: 10.1177/0265407500173004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Dillard, J. P. (2012). A review and meta-analysis of person-centered messages and social support outcomes. Communication Studies, 63, 99–118. doi:10.7080/10510974.2011.598208 doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.598208
   Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2014). Communication channel, sex, and the immediate and longitudinal outcomes of verbal person-centered support. Communication Monographs, 81, 439–468. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.933245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2016). Explaining the durable effects of verbal person-centered supportive communication: Indirect effects or invisible support? Human Communication Research, 42, 200–220. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality: A meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 7, 1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M. (2004). Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helper competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations. Communication Research, 31, 338–360. doi: 10.1177/0093650204263436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Bodie, G. D. (2014). Supportive communication. In C. R. Berger (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Interpersonal communication Vol. 6 (pp. 371–394). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Guerrero, L. K. (2001). Nonverbal immediacy and verbal person-centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 4, 567–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Wirtz, J. G. (2006). How does the comforting process work?: An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Human Communication Research, 32, 217–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(731), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed. pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Gillihan, S. J., Samter, W., & Clark, R. A. (2003). Skill deficit or differential motivation? Accounting for sex differences in the provision of emotional support. Communication Research, 30, 272–303. doi: 10.1177/0093650203030003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Graves, A. R., Feng, B., Gillihan, S. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men’s and women’s provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50, 143–175. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000015549.88984.8d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., & Wilkum, K. (2012). Predicting comforting quality in the context of miscarriage. Communication Reports, 25, 62–74. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2012.719463
   Google Scholar
• Metts, S., Backhaus, S., & Kazoleas, D. (1995). Social support as problematic communication. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Pennebaker Conglomerates (www.LIWC.net). Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Priem, J. S., & Solomon, D. H. (2015a). Emotional supportive and physiological stress recovery: The role of support matching, adequacy, and invisibility. Communication Monographs, 82, 88–112. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.971416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, J. S., & Solomon, D. H. (2015b). What is supportive about supportive conversation? Qualities of interaction that predict emotional and physiological outcomes. Communication Research, 1–31. doi: 10.1177/0093650215595074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, J. S., Solomon, D. H., & Steuber, K. R. (2009). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of emotionally supportive communication in marriage. Personal Relationships, 16, 531–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Brunner, S. R., Akers, C., Pavlich, C. A., & Tsetsi, E. (2016). The implications of computer-mediated communication (CMC) for social support message processing and outcomes: When and why are the effects of support messages strengthened during CMC? Human Communication Research, 42, 553–576. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samter, W., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2016). Coding comforting behavior from verbal person centeredness. In C. A. VanLear & D. Canary (Eds.), Researching interactive communication behavior (pp. 107–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. (2012). Turn down the volume or change the channel? Emotional effects of detached versus positive reappraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 416–429. doi: 10.1037/a0029208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Salomonson, K., & Bahk, C. (1993). The relationship of empathy to comforting behavior following film exposure. Communication Research, 20, 723–738. doi: 10.1177/009365093020005005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Youngvorst, L. J., & Jones, S. M. (2017). The influence of cognitive complexity, empathy, and mindfulness on person-centered message evaluations. Communication Quarterly. Advance Online Publication, doi: 10.1080/01463373.2017.1301508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar