Give thanks for a little and you will find a lot: The role of a support seeker’s reply in online support provision

References

• Aakhus, M., & Rumsey, E. (2010). Crafting supportive communication online: A communication design analysis of conflict in an online support group. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 65–84. doi: 10.1080/00909880903483581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 365–392. doi: 10.1177/0265407598153004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algoe, S. B., Fredrickson, B. L., & Gable, S. L. (2013). The social functions of the emotion of gratitude via expression. Emotion, 13, 605–609. doi: 10.1037/a0032701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguello, J., Butler, B., Joyce, E., Kraut, R., Ling, K. S., Rose, C., & Wang, X. (2006). Talk to me: Foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. CHI ‘06 proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124916
   Google Scholar
• Attard, A., & Coulson, N. S. (2012). A thematic analysis of patient communication in Parkinson’s disease online support group discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 500–506. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Ang, P. C., & Fearns, J. B. (2014). Being unfriended on Facebook: An application of expectancy violation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, M. J., Shearman, S. M., Lee, S. Y., Ohashi, R., & Mosher, D. (2002). Personal and cultural differences in responding to criticism in three countries. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(2), 93–105. doi: 10.1111/1467-839X.00097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, H., & Coulson, N. S. (2007). Accessing dental anxiety online support groups: An exploratory qualitative study of motives and experiences. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(3), 263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48. doi: 10.1177/0261927X93121003
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 194–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58–79. doi: 10.1080/03637758809376158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2, 131–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00706.x
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. (2010). The nature of interpersonal communication: A message-centered approach. In C. Berger, M. Roloff, & D. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 145–165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578–1588. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep8588469 doi: 10.2307/1130086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (1987). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 305–349). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2003). Emotional support skills. In J. O. Greene, & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 551–594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2007). Constructivism: A general theory of communication skill. In B. B. Whaley, & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 105–128). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Goldsmith, D. J. (1998). How the comforting process works: Alleviating emotional distress through conversationally induced reappraisals. In P. A. Andersen, & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 245–280). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R., & Mortenson, S. R. (2003). Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors: Exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals. Communication Research, 30, 113–146. doi: 10.1177/0093650202250873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, C. T., Wohn, D. Y., & Hayes, R. A. (2016). As social support: Relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 385–393. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColÓn, Y., & Friedman, B. (2003). Conducting group therapy online. In S. Goss, & K. Anthony (Eds.), Technology in counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 59–74). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Lamberti, D. (1986). Does social approval increase helping? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 149–157. doi: 10.1177/0146167286122001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., & Edwards, A. (2013). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication: The influence of mixed reviews on student perceptions of instructors and courses. Communication Education, 62, 412–424. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2013.800217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibach, R. P., Wilmot, M. O., & Libby, L. K. (2015). The system-justifying function of gratitude norms. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 348–358. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B., Li, S., & Li, N. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43, 253–276. doi: 10.1177/0093650213510942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, B., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2010). The influences of message and source factors on advice outcomes. Communication Research, 37, 553–575. doi: 10.1177/0093650210368258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Kim, H., & Ki, S. 2016. Investigating the role of control and support mechanisms in members’ sense of virtual community. Communication Research. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1177/0093650216644023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 946–955. doi: 10.1037/a0017935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haker, H., Lauber, C., & Rössler, W. (2005). Internet forums: A self-help approach for individuals with schizophrenia? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 112(6), 474–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00662.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• High, A. C., & Dillard, J. P. (2012). A review and meta-analysis of person-centered messages and social support outcomes. Communication Studies, 63, 99–118. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.598208
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). “It's OK if we say it, but you can't”: responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 293–307. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., & Burleson, B. R. (1996). [Emotion-focused and problem-focused coding system]. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 38, 54–69. doi:10.1177/00093650210378229 doi: 10.1177/0093650210378229
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Kraut, R. E., Resnick, P., & Kittur, A. (2011). Regulating behavior in online communities. In R. E. Kraut, & P. Resnick (Eds.), Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design (pp. 125–178). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63, 518–526. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. J., & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37, 825–846. doi: 10.1177/0093650210376189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Feng, B. (2015). What to say to an online support-seeker? The influence of others’ responses and support-seekers’ replies. Human Communication Research, 41, 303–326. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Gillihan, S. J., Samter, W., & Clark, R. A. (2003). Skill deficit or differential motivation? Testing alternative explanations for gender differences in the provision of emotional support. Communication Research, 30, 272–303. doi: 10.1177/0093650203030003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzat, U., & Snijders, C. (2012). Rebuilding trust in online shops on consumer review sites: Sellers’ responses to user-generated complaints. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(1), 62–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychology Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Kimeldorf, M. B., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). An adaption for altruism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 281–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00590.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. doi: 10.1177/1461444816686104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., Feng, B., & Wingate, V. S. (2018). What You Say Is what You Get: How self-disclosure in support seeking affects language Use in support provision in online support forums. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(1), 3–27. doi:10.1177/026192717706983 doi: 10.1177/0261927X17706983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendry, L. F., & Salvatore, J. (2015). Individual and social benefits of online discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2008). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., & Keating, D. M. (2011). Health blogging: An examination of the outcomes associated with making public, written disclosures about health. Communication Research. doi: 10.1177/0093650212458952
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Peterson, E. B., & Wright, K. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 1–28. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., & Wright, K. B. (2016). Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-Art review and agenda for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 175–211. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2015.11735260
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35, 309–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez Jr.A., & Wang, Z. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violations theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spottswood, E. L., Walther, J. B., Holmstrom, A. J., & Ellison, N. B. (2013). Person-centered emotional support and gender attributions in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 39, 295–316. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. (1989). Gratitude and attitude: a note on emotional welfare. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(3), 242–248. doi: 10.2307/2786719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroebe, W., Zech, E., Stoebe, M. S., & Abakoumkin, G. (2005). Does social support help in bereavement? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 1030–1050. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2005.24.7.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., Witenberg, S., & Gutkin, D. (1981). Evaluating reciprocal and nonreciprocal prosocial behavior: Developmental changes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 25–31. doi:10.1177.014616728171005 doi: 10.1177/014616728171005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, N., Rau, P. P.-L., & Ma, L. (2014). Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, J. A. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behaviour: An experimental test of gratitude. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 138–148. doi: 10.1080/02699930500172341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51, 231–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02879.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90. doi: 10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcemnt on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., & Shen, F. (2017). Reciprocal communication in online health support groups: Effects of message format and social support on individual responses to health issues. Media Psychology, 20, 240–266. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2016.1142381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. B., Rains, S., & Banas, J. (2010). Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 606–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I. (2004). Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 260–281. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2909
   Google Scholar
• Youngvorst, L. J., & High, A. C. (2018). “Anyone free to chat?” Using technological features to elicit quality support online. Communication Monographs, 85, 203–223. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2018.1426871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar