References
- Bassili, J. N., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). Do strength-related attitude properties determine susceptibility to response effects? New evidence from response latency, attitude extremity, and aggregate indices. Political Psychology, 21(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00179
- Bessarabova, E., Fink, E. L., & Turner, M. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statics. Human Communication Research, 39(3), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12007
- Bessarabova, E., Turner, M. M., Fink, E. L., & Blustein, N. B. (2015). Extending the theory of reactance to guilt appeals. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000223
- Bochner, S., & Insko, C. A. (1966). Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021192
- Bohner, G., Ruder, M., & Erb, H. (2002). When expertise backfires: Contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149858
- Brehm, J. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press.
- Brehm, S., & Brehm, J. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
- Byrne, S., & Hart, P. (2009). The boomerang effect: A synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 33 (pp. 3–38). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Byrne, S., Linz, D., & Potter, W. J. (2009). A test of competing cognitive explanations for the boomerang effect in response to the deliberate disruption of media-induced aggression. Media Psychology, 12(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903052265
- Chung, S., Fink, E. L., & Kaplowitz, S. A. (2008). The comparative statics and dynamics of beliefs: The effect of message discrepancy and source credibility. Communication Monographs, 75(2), 158–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802082060
- Clark, J. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2013). Message position, information processing, and persuasion: The discrepancy motives model. In P. Devine & A. Plat (Eds), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 189–232). Academic Press.
- Dillard, J., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815
- Eagly, A. H., & Telaak, K. (1972). Width of the latitude of acceptance as a determinant of attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(3), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033161
- Fink, E. L. (2009). The FAQs on data transformation. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310352
- Fink, E. L., & Cai, D. A. (2013). Discrepancy models of belief change. In J. P. Dillard , & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion research: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 84–103). Sage.
- Granberg, D. (1982). Social judgment theory. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 304–329). Sage.
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Kim, S. Y., Levine, T., & Allen, M. (2013). Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies, 64(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.755639
- Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- Miller, C., Lane, L., Deatrick, L., Young, A., & Potts, K. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x
- Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory – 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9
- Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x
- Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2011). Comparing the effects of entertainment and educational television programming on risky sexual behavior. Health Communication, 26(5), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.552481
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). MPlus: Statistical analysis with latent variables – User's guide. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/ugexcerpts.shtml.
- Park, H., Levine, T., Westerman, C., Orfgen, T., & Foregger, S. (2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Human Communication Research, 33(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00290.x
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
- Petty, R., Cacioppo, J., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
- Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2004). Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. A. Prentice (Eds), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress (pp. 37–51). American Psychological Association.
- Quick, B. L. (2012). What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication, 27(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.567446
- Quick, B. L., & Kim, D. K. (2009). Examining reactance and reactance restoration with South Korean adolescents: A test of psychological reactance within a collectivist culture. Communication Research, 36(6), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650290346797
- Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111–163). Basil Blackwell.
- Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
- Rains, S. A., & Turner, M. M. (2007). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x
- Rosenberg, B. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2017). A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Science, 4(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more (Version 0.4-9 beta) [Computer software]. http://byrneslab.net/classes/lavaan_materials/lavaanIntroduction4-9.pdf.
- Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Grisevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
- Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x
- Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, G. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Saunders.
- Silvia, P. J. (2006). Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(5), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.309
- Werle, C. O., & Cuny, C. (2012). The boomerang effect of mandatory sanitary messages to prevent obesity. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9195-0
- Wicklund, R. A. (1974). Freedom and reactance. Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. (1970). Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028620
- Zhao, X. (2017). Testing a dual path framework of the boomerang effect: Proattitudinal versus counterattitudinal messages [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Maryland at College Park. Digital Repository at http://hdl.handle.net/1903/19926.