References
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2021). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary second model. Mplus Web Notes: No. 21 (Version 11). https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf
- Bakk, Z., & Vermunt, J. K. (2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.955104
- Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relationships. Edward Arnold.
- Berscheid, E. (2002). Emotion. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 110–168). Percheron Press.
- Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001
- Brisini, K. S. C., & Solomon, D. H. (2021). Distinguishing relational turbulence, marital satisfaction, and parenting stress as predictors of ineffective arguing among parents of children with autism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520958197
- Ferguson, S. L., Moore, E. W. G., & Hull, D. M. (2020). Finding latent groups in observed data: A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419881721
- Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988a). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage. Sage.
- Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988b). A typological approach to marital interaction. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 98–120). Multilingual Matters.
- Givertz, M., Segrin, C., & Hanzal, A. (2009). The association between satisfaction and commitment differs across marital types. Communication Research, 36(4), 561–584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333035
- Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., Brisini, K., & Solomon, D. H. (2021). Relational uncertainty within relational turbulence theory: The bifactor exploratory structural equation model. Journal of Communication. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab009
- Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., Sharabi, L. L., Myers, S. A., & Baker, J. P. (2020). The relational turbulence model: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 46(2–3), 222–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa002
- Goodboy, A. K., & Kline, R. B. (2017). Statistical and practical concerns with published communication research featuring structural equation modeling. Communication Research Reports, 34(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1214121
- Goodboy, A. K., & Martin, M. M. (2020). Omega over alpha for reliability estimation of unidimensional communication measures. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 422–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1846135
- Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in martial interaction: A longitudinal view of the five couple types. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.6
- Gottman, J. M. (2015). Principia amoris: The new science of love. Routledge.
- Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct validity with latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future – a festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Social Scientific International.
- Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
- Holman, T. B., & Jarvis, M. O. (2003). Hostile, volatile, avoiding, and validating couple-conflict types: An investigation of Gottman’s couple conflict types. Personal Relationships, 10(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00049
- Howard, J., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J. S., & Van den Broeck, A. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 74–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
- Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Hutson, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, L. A., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (2002). Analyzing close relationships. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Hutson, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 20–67). Percheron Press.
- Knobloch, L. K., Basinger, E. D., & Theiss, J. A. (2018). Relational turbulence and perceptions of partner support during reintegration after military deployment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1409906
- Knobloch, L. K., Miller, L. E., & Carpenter, K. E. (2007). Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00143.x
- Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/28.2.243
- Knobloch, L. K., & Theiss, J. A. (2010). An actor-partner interdependence model of relational turbulence: Cognitions and emotions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(5), 595–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510368967
- Knobloch, L. K., & Theiss, J. A. (2011). Relational uncertainty and relationship talk within courtship: A longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model. Communication Monographs, 78(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.542471
- Knobloch, L., & Solomon, D. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499
- Knoster, K., Howard, H. A., Goodboy, A. K., & Dillow, M. R. (2020). Spousal interference and relational turbulence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Research Reports, 37(5), 254–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1841621
- Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
- Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In P. E. Nathan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.
- McLaren, R. M., Solomon, D. H., & Priem, J. S. (2011). Explaining variation in contemporaneous responses to hurt in premarital relationships: A relational turbulence model perspective. Communication Research, 38(4), 543–564. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210377896
- McLarnon, M. J. W., Morin, A. J. S., & Litalien, D. (2021). Profiles of engagement dimensions and targets: Applications and opportunities for person-centered analytic techniques. In J. P. Meyer & B. Schneider (Eds.), Research agenda for employee engagement in the changing world of work (pp. 225–243). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- McLarnon, M. J. W., & O’Neill, T. A. (2018). Extensions of auxiliary variable approached for the investigation of mediation, moderation, and conditional effects in mixture models. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 955–982. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118770731
- Morin, A. J. S., Arens, K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
- Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., Madore, I., & Desrumaux, P. (2016). Further reflections on disentangling shape and level effects in person-centered analyses: An illustration exploring the dimensionality of psychological health. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(3), 438–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1116077
- Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2017). Complementary variable- and person-centered approaches to the dimensionality of psychometric constructs: Application to psychological wellbeing at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9448-7
- Morin, A. J. S., McLarnon, M. J. W., & Litalien, D. (2020). Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. In Y. Griep & S. D. Hansen (Eds.), Handbook on the temporal dynamics of organizational behavior (pp. 351–379). Edward Elgar.
- Morin, A. J. S., Myers, N. D., & Lee, S. (2020). Modern factor analytic techniques: Bifactor model, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor-ESEM. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (4th ed., pp. 1044–1073). Wiley.
- Morin, A. J. S., & Wang, J. C. K. (2016). A gentle introduction to mixture modeling using physical fitness data. In N. Ntoumanis & N. Myers (Eds.), An introduction to intermediate and advanced statistical analyses for sport and exercise scientists (pp. 183–210). Wiley.
- Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
- Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
- Nylund-Gibson, K., Grimm, R. P., & Masyn, K. E. (2019). Prediction from latent classes: A demonstration of different approaches to include distal outcomes in mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(6), 967–985. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1590146
- Olson, D. H., & Fowers, B. J. (1993). Five types of marriage: An empirical typology based on ENRICH. The Family Journal, 1(3), 196–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480793013002
- Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. A. (1974). Communication conflict and marriage. Jossey-Bass.
- Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
- Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
- Solomon, D. H., & Brisini, K. S. C. (2017). Operationalizing relational turbulence theory: Measurement and construct validation. Personal Relationships, 24(4), 768–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12212
- Solomon, D. H., & Brisini, K. S. C. (2019). Relational uncertainty and interdependence processes in marriage: A test of relational turbulence theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2416–2436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026540751878870
- Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(6), 795–816. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838
- Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., Theiss, J. A., & McLaren, R. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 507–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091
- Tein, J.-Y., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 20(4), 640–657. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
- Theiss, J. A., & Estlein, R. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of the perceived threat of sexual communication: A test of the relational turbulence model. Western Journal of Communication, 78(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.845794
- Theiss, J. A., & Nagy, M. E. (2010). Actor-partner effects in the associations between relationship characteristics and reactions to marital sexual intimacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(8), 1089–1109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510381254
- Theiss, J. A., & Nagy, M. E. (2013). A relational turbulence model of partner responsiveness and relationship talk across cultures. Western Journal of Communication, 77(2), 186–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.720746
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063