772
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identifying moments of peak audience engagement from brain responses during story listening

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 515-538 | Received 03 Apr 2021, Accepted 06 Jan 2022, Published online: 13 Feb 2022

References

  • Abelson, R., & Schank, R. C. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Abraham, A., Pedregosa, F., Eickenberg, M., Gervais, P., Mueller, A., Kossaifi, J., Gramfort, A., Thirion, B., & Varoquaux, G. (2014). Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00014.
  • Alcalá-López, D., Smallwood, J., Jefferies, E., Van Overwalle, F., Vogeley, K., Mars, R. B., Turetsky, B. I., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., Eickhoff, S. B., & Bzdok, D. (2017). Computing the social brain connectome across systems and states. Cerebral Cortex, 28(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx121.
  • Alho, K., Rinne, T., Herron, T. J., & Woods, D. L. (2014). Stimulus-dependent activations and attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Hearing Research, 307, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.001.
  • Amir, O., Biederman, I., Wang, Z., & Xu, X. (2015). Ha ha! Versus aha! A direct comparison of humor to nonhumorous insight for determining the neural correlates of mirth. Cerebral Cortex, 25(5), 1405–1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht343.
  • Berns, G. S., & Moore, S. E. (2012). A neural predictor of cultural popularity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.001.
  • Bisk, Y., Holtzman, A., Thomason, J., Andreas, J., Bengio, Y., Chai, J., Lapata, M., Lazaridou, A., May, J., Nisnevich, A., Pinto, N., & Turian, J. (2020). Experience grounds language. In arXiv [cs.CL]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10151v3.
  • Bower, G. H., & Rinck, M. (1999). Goals as generators of activation in narrative understanding. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 111–134). Routledge.
  • Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard University Press.
  • Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555.
  • Brown, D. E. (2004). Human universals, human nature & human culture. Daedalus, 133(4), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365645.
  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019.
  • Bullock, O. M., Colón Amill, D., Shulman, H. C., & Dixon, G. N. (2019). Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519865687.
  • Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Adolphs, R., Sue Carter, C., McClintock, M. K., Meaney, M. J., Schacter, D. L., Sternberg, E. M., Suomi, S., & Taylor, S. E. (2002). Foundations in social neuroscience. MIT Press.
  • Carter, R. M., & Huettel, S. A. (2013). A nexus model of the temporal–parietal junction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(7), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.007.
  • Cascio, C. N., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Neuroscience. In K. B. Jensen & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1351–1359). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect171.
  • Coronel, J. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Pandey, P., Delli Carpini, M. X., & Falk, E. B. (2021). Political humor, sharing, and remembering: Insights from neuroimaging. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa041.
  • Cummins, R. (2010). The world in the head. Oxford University Press.
  • Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2007). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. The Neuroscientist, 13(6), 580–593.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858407304654.
  • Dmochowski, J. P., Bezdek, M. A., Abelson, B. P., Johnson, J. S., Schumacher, E. H., & Parra, L. C. (2014). Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing. Nature Communications, 5(1), 4567. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5567.
  • Dmochowski, J. P., Sajda, P., Dias, J., & Parra, L. C. (2012). Correlated components of ongoing EEG point to emotionally laden attention–a possible marker of engagement? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00112
  • Dohmatob, E., Dumas, G., & Bzdok, D. (2020). Dark control: The default mode network as a reinforcement learning agent. Human Brain Mapping, 41(12), 3318–3341. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25019.
  • Edlow, B. L., Takahashi, E., Wu, O., Benner, T., Dai, G., Bu, L., Grant, P. E., Greer, D. M., Greenberg, S. M., Kinney, H. C., & Folkerth, R. D. (2012). Neuroanatomic connectivity of the human ascending arousal system critical to consciousness and its disorders. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 71(6), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e3182588293.
  • Esteban, O., Markiewicz, C. J., Blair, R. W., Moodie, C. A., Ilkay Isik, A., Erramuzpe, A., Kent, J. D., Goncalves, M., DuPre, E., Snyder, M., Oya, H., Ghosh, S. S., Wright, J., Durnez, J., Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2019). fMRIPrep: A robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nature Methods, 16(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4.
  • Falk, E. B., Cascio, C. N., & Coronel, J. C. (2015). Neural prediction of communication-relevant outcomes. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1-2), 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2014.999750.
  • Falk, E., & Scholz, C. (2017). Persuasion, influence, and value: Perspectives from communication and social neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 329–356. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011821.
  • Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29(5), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20422.
  • Fisher, J. T., Hopp, F. R., & Weber, R. (2021). A practical introduction to network neuroscience for communication researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 15(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1860206.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. SAGE.
  • Floyd, K., & Weber, R. (2020). The handbook of communication science and biology. Routledge.
  • Franklin, R. G., & Adams, R. B. (2011). The reward of a good joke: Neural correlates of viewing dynamic displays of stand-up comedy. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(4), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0049-7.
  • Geng, J. J., & Vossel, S. (2013). Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: Contextual updating? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10 Pt 2), 2608–2620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010.
  • Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2010). Bubbles: A new technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Journal of Vision, 1(3), 333–333a. https://doi.org/10.1167/1.3.333.
  • Graesser, A. C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229–262). Psychology Press.
  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371.
  • Grall, C., & Finn, E. S. (2021, July 27). Leveraging the power of media to drive cognition: A media-informed approach to naturalistic neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c8z9t
  • Grall, C., Tamborini, R., Weber, R., & Schmälzle, R. (2021). Stories collectively engage listeners’ brains: Enhanced intersubject correlations during reception of personal narratives. Journal of Communication, 71(2), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab004.
  • Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., & Brock, T. C. (2002). Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606648.
  • Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611434210.
  • Hasson, U., & Honey, C. J. (2012). Future trends in neuroimaging: Neural processes as expressed within real-life contexts. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1272–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.004.
  • Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089506.
  • Hickok, G., & Small, S. L. (2015). Neurobiology of language. Academic Press.
  • Hirschberg, J., & Manning, C. D. (2015). Advances in natural language processing. Science, 349(6245), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8685.
  • Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160(1), 106–154. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837.
  • Huettel, S. A. (2008). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (2nd ed.). Sinauer Associates.
  • Humphries, C., Liebenthal, E., & Binder, J. R. (2010). Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.046.
  • Huskey, R., Bue, A. C., Eden, A., Grall, C., Meshi, D., Prena, K., Schmälzle, R., Scholz, C., Turner, B., & Wilcox, S. (2020). Marr’s tri-level framework integrates biological explanation across communication subfields. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 356–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa007.
  • Huskey, R., Craighead, B., Miller, M. B., & Weber, R. (2018a). Does intrinsic reward motivate cognitive control? A naturalistic-fMRI study based on the synchronization theory of flow. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(5), 902–924. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0612-6.
  • Huskey, R., Wilcox, S., & Weber, R. (2018b). Network neuroscience reveals distinct neuromarkers of flow during media use. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 872–895. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy043.
  • Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637.
  • Imhof, M. A., Schmälzle, R., Renner, B., & Schupp, H. T. (2017). How real-life health messages engage our brains: Shared processing of effective anti-alcohol videos. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 12(7), 1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx044.
  • Imhof, M. A., Schmälzle, R., Renner, B., & Schupp, H. T. (2020). Strong health messages increase audience brain coupling. NeuroImage, 216, 116527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116527.
  • Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pajula, J., Tohka, J., Lee, H.-J., Kuo, W.-J., & Lin, F.-H. (2016). Brain hemodynamic activity during viewing and re-viewing of comedy movies explained by experienced humor. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 27741. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27741.
  • Jääskeläinen, I. P., Sams, M., Glerean, E., & Ahveninen, J. (2020). Movies and narratives as naturalistic stimuli in neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 224, 117445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117445.
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Knutson, B., & Greer, S. M. (2008). Anticipatory affect: Neural correlates and consequences for choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 3771–3786. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0155.
  • Kranzler, E. C., Schmälzle, R., Pei, R., Hornik, R. C., & Falk, E. B. (2019). Message-elicited brain response moderates the relationship between opportunities for exposure to anti-smoking messages and message recall. Journal of Communication, 69(6), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz035.
  • Lerner, Y., Honey, C. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2011). Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(8), 2906–2915. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-10.2011.
  • Lieberman, M. D. (2015). Introduction to social cognitive neuroscience. Brain Mapping, 3, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.09992-9.
  • Mar, R. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406.
  • Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., Schüffelgen, U., Jbabdi, S., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2012). Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right “temporoparietal junction area”: Evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cerebral Cortex, 22(8), 1894–1903. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr268.
  • Mather, M., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (2013). How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(1), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612469037.
  • McNamara, Q., De La Vega, A., & Yarkoni, T. (2017, August). Developing a comprehensive framework for multimodal feature extraction. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Halifax, Nova Scotia – Canada. pp. 1567–1574. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098075
  • Merton, R. K. (1987). Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245.
  • Miller, L. C., Shaikh, S. J., Jeong, D. C., Wang, L., Gillig, T. K., Godoy, C. G., Appleby, P. R., Corsbie-Massay, C. L., Marsella, S., Christensen, J. L., & Read, S. J. (2019). Causal inference in generalizable environments: Systematic representative design. Psychological Inquiry, 30(4), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1693866.
  • Mobbs, D., Greicius, M. D., Abdel-Azim, E., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2003). Humor modulates the mesolimbic reward centers. Neuron, 40(5), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00751-7.
  • Moerel, M., De Martino, F., & Formisano, E. (2014). An anatomical and functional topography of human auditory cortical areas. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00225.
  • Nastase, S. A., Liu, Y. F., Hillman, H., Zadbood, A., Hasenfratz, L., Keshavarzian, N., Chen, J., Honey, C. J., Yeshurun, Y., Regev, M., & Husson, U. (2019). Narratives: fMRI data for evaluating models of naturalistic language comprehension. OpenNeuro. https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds002345.v1.1.4.
  • O’Donnell, M. B., Falk, E. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2015). Social in, social out: How the brain responds to social language with more social language. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.990472.
  • Pauli, W. M., Nili, A. N., & Tyszka, J. M. (2018). A high-resolution probabilistic in vivo atlas of human subcortical brain nuclei. Scientific Data, 5(1), 180063. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.63.
  • Pei, R., Schmälzle, R., Kranzler, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (2019). Adolescents’ neural response to tobacco prevention messages and sharing engagement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 56(2S1), S40–S48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.044.
  • Ringach, D., & Shapley, R. (2010). Reverse correlation in neurophysiology. Cognitive Science, 28(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2802_2.
  • Sabatinelli, D., Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., Costa, V. D., & Keil, A. (2009). The timing of emotional discrimination in human amygdala and ventral visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(47), 14864–14868. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3278-09.2009.
  • Salgado, S., & Kaplitt, M. G. (2015). The nucleus accumbens: A comprehensive review. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 93(2), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368279.
  • Salimpoor, V. N., van den Bosch, I., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A. R., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2013). Interactions between the nucleus accumbens and auditory cortices predict music reward value. Science, 340(6129), 216–219. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231059.
  • Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-2.
  • Schank, R. C. (1995). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Northwestern University Press.
  • Schmälzle, R., Brook O’Donnell, M., Garcia, J. O., Cascio, C. N., Bayer, J., Bassett, D. S., Vettel, J. M., & Falk, E. B. (2017). Brain connectivity dynamics during social interaction reflect social network structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(20), 5153–5158. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616130114.
  • Schmälzle, R., Cooper, N., O’Donnel, M., Tompson, S., Lee, S., Cantrell, J., Vettel, J., & Falk, E. (2020). The effectiveness of online messages for promoting smoking cessation resources: Predicting nationwide campaign effects from neural responses in the EX campaign. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.565772.
  • Schmälzle, R., Häcker, F., Honey Christopher, J., & Hasson, U. (2015). Engaged listeners: Shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neurosciences, 1, 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu168
  • Schmälzle, R., & Meshi, D. (2020). Communication neuroscience: Theory, methodology and experimental approaches. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1708283.
  • Schramm, W. (1971). The nature of communication between humans. In D. R. Wilbur Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication. University of Illinois Press.
  • Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009.
  • Schurz, M., Tholen, M. G., Perner, J., Mars, R. B., & Sallet, J. (2017). Specifying the brain anatomy underlying temporo-parietal junction activations for theory of mind: A review using probabilistic atlases from different imaging modalities. Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4788–4805. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23675.
  • Shen, X., Tokoglu, F., Papademetris, X., & Constable, R. T. (2013). Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification. NeuroImage, 82, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.081.
  • Stein, N. L. (1982). The definition of a story. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5–6), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90022-4.
  • Tamborini, R., Grady, S. M., Baldwin, J., McClaran, N., & Lewis, R. (2021). The narrative enjoyment and appreciation rationale. The Oxford Handbook of Entertainment Theory, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190072216.013.3.
  • Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547.
  • Wagner, D. D., Kelley, W. M., Haxby, J. V., & Heatherton, T. F. (2016). The dorsal medial prefrontal cortex responds preferentially to social interactions during natural viewing. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(26), 6917–6925. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4220-15.2016.
  • Watson, N. V., & Breedlove, S. M. (2012). The mind’s machine: Foundations of brain and behavior. Sinauer Associates.
  • Weber, R., Huskey, R., Mangus, J. M., Westcott-Baker, A., & Turner, B. O. (2015). Neural predictors of message effectiveness during counterarguing in antidrug campaigns. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.971414.
  • Wehbe, L., Murphy, B., Talukdar, P., Fyshe, A., Ramdas, A., & Mitchell, T. (2014). Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses. PloS One, 9(11), e112575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112575.
  • Wilcox, S., Dorrance Hall, E., Holmstrom, A. J., & Schmälzle, R. (2020). The emerging Frontier of interpersonal communication and neuroscience: Scanning the social synapse. Annals of the International Communication Association, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1843366..
  • Willems, R. M., Nastase, S. A., & Milivojevic, B. (2020). Narratives for neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(5), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.003.
  • Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8(8), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1635.
  • Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M., & Hasson, U. (2021). The default mode network: Were the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-00420-w.
  • Zillman, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80008-5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.