Account analysis of influence in group decision‐making

References

• Chandler , T.A. 1981 . “ Decision‐making in small groups: A comparison of two models ” . Department of Communication, Cleveland State University . Unpublished masters thesis
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , D.G. and Fisher , B.A. 1975 . Phases of conflict in small group development: A Markov analysis . Human Communication Research , 1 : 195 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Fisher , B.A. 1975 . Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making . Human Communication Research , 2 : 66 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Fisher , G.A. and Hawes , L.C. 1971 . An interact system model: Generating a grounded theory of small groups . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 57 : 444 – 453 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré , R. and Secord , P.F. 1973 . The explanation of social behavior. , Totawa, NJ : Littlefield, Adams .
   Google Scholar
• Hawes , L.C. and Foley , J.M. 1976 . “ Group decisioning: Testing a finite stochastic model ” . In Explorations in interpersonal communication , Edited by: Miller , G.R. 237 – 254 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Jackson , S. 1983 . “ Building a case for claims about discourse structure ” . Department of Communication, Michigan State University . Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Krueger , D.L. 1979 . A stochastic analysis of communication development in self‐analytic groups . Human Communication Research , 5 : 314 – 324 .
   Google Scholar
• Poole , M.S. 1981 . Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models . Communication Monographs , 48 : 1 – 24 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon , H.A. 1976 . Administrative behavior: A study of decision‐making process in administrative organization. , New York : The Free Press .
   Google Scholar
• Spillman , B. , Bexdek , J. and Spillman , R. 1979 . Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus . Communication Monographs , 46 : 1 – 12 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins , P.K. and Cheney , G. 1983 . “ The uses of account analysis: A study of organizational decision‐making and identification ” . In Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach , Edited by: Putnam , L.L. and Pacanowsky , M.E. 123 – 146 . Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Patricia Geist and Teresa Chandler are doctoral students in the Department of Communication, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar